|
     Death Rate Report by State, death years through 2006
Colon & Rectum Healthy People 2010 Objective Number: 03-05
Reduce the colorectal cancer death rate.
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages Sorted by Rate |
State
 |
Met Healthy People Objective of 13.9? 1 |
Annual Death Rate over rate period deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
 |
Deaths per Year over rate period
 |
Rate Period |
Recent Trend 2 |
Recent Average Annual Percent Change2 in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
 |
Recent Trend Period2 |
| United States |
No |
17.1 (17.0, 17.3) |
53,196 |
2006 |
falling |
-3.4 (-3.9, -2.9) |
2002 - 2006 |
| District of Columbia |
No |
22.4 (18.7, 26.6) |
132 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.4 (-3.3, -1.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Louisiana |
No |
20.0 (18.6, 21.4) |
855 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.6 (-7.5, -1.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Mississippi |
No |
20.0 (18.4, 21.7) |
591 |
2006 |
stable  |
-0.1 (-0.3, 0.1) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Alabama |
No |
19.6 (18.4, 20.9) |
975 |
2006 |
falling |
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.7) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Kentucky |
No |
19.6 (18.3, 20.9) |
863 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.7 (-2.2, -1.3) |
2002 - 2006 |
| West Virginia |
No |
19.4 (17.6, 21.4) |
435 |
2006 |
falling |
-5.1 (-9.7, -0.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Illinois |
No |
19.3 (18.5, 20.0) |
2,502 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.1 (-2.4, -1.9) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Nebraska |
No |
19.2 (17.3, 21.3) |
382 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.6, -1.3) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Ohio |
No |
19.1 (18.4, 19.9) |
2,431 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.1 (-2.2, -1.9) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Indiana |
No |
18.8 (17.7, 19.9) |
1,225 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.8 (-2.1, -1.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| New Jersey |
No |
18.7 (17.8, 19.6) |
1,773 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.8 (-3.0, -2.5) |
2002 - 2006 |
| North Dakota |
No |
18.7 (15.7, 22.1) |
147 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.3 (-3.1, -1.4) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Pennsylvania |
No |
18.7 (18.0, 19.4) |
2,916 |
2006 |
falling |
-3.9 (-5.2, -2.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Montana |
No |
18.5 (16.0, 21.3) |
200 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Wyoming |
No |
18.5 (15.0, 22.6) |
98 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.0 (-5.8, -2.1) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Iowa |
No |
18.4 (17.0, 19.9) |
668 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.8 (-1.9, -1.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Maryland |
No |
18.4 (17.3, 19.6) |
1,015 |
2006 |
falling |
-3.1 (-3.6, -2.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| South Carolina |
No |
18.1 (16.8, 19.3) |
832 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.8 (-2.3, -1.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Missouri |
No |
17.8 (16.8, 18.9) |
1,149 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.7 (-7.5, -1.9) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Nevada |
No |
17.8 (16.1, 19.7) |
403 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.7) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Tennessee |
No |
17.7 (16.7, 18.8) |
1,125 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.4 (-1.9, -1.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Arkansas |
No |
17.6 (16.2, 19.1) |
555 |
2006 |
stable  |
-4.1 (-9.7, 1.9) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Kansas |
No |
17.6 (16.1, 19.2) |
527 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.7 (-2.1, -1.4) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Michigan |
No |
17.6 (16.8, 18.4) |
1,877 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.4 (-2.6, -2.1) |
2002 - 2006 |
| New Hampshire |
No |
17.2 (15.1, 19.6) |
241 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.3 (-2.6, -2.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Alaska |
No |
17.1 (13.1, 21.8) |
69 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.6 (-2.4, -0.8) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Maine |
No |
17.1 (15.1, 19.2) |
275 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.9 (-7.1, -2.7) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Oklahoma |
No |
17.1 (15.8, 18.4) |
657 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.0 (-1.1, -0.8) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Georgia |
No |
17.0 (16.1, 18.0) |
1,352 |
2006 |
falling |
-3.1 (-4.3, -1.8) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Massachusetts |
No |
17.0 (16.1, 18.0) |
1,244 |
2006 |
falling |
-3.4 (-3.8, -3.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Virginia |
No |
17.0 (16.0, 17.9) |
1,266 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.8 (-7.2, -2.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| New York |
No |
16.8 (16.2, 17.4) |
3,536 |
2006 |
falling |
-5.5 (-7.3, -3.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Texas |
No |
16.8 (16.3, 17.4) |
3,350 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.6 (-3.0, -2.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| North Carolina |
No |
16.7 (15.9, 17.6) |
1,501 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.5 (-3.1, -2.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Vermont |
No |
16.4 (13.5, 19.7) |
116 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.2 (-2.7, -1.7) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Colorado |
No |
15.9 (14.7, 17.2) |
653 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.9 (-2.3, -1.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Delaware |
No |
15.9 (13.4, 18.7) |
148 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.9 (-3.6, -2.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Connecticut |
No |
15.8 (14.6, 17.1) |
639 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.9 (-6.4, -3.4) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Wisconsin |
No |
15.8 (14.8, 16.8) |
971 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.5 (-6.7, -2.2) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Florida |
No |
15.7 (15.2, 16.3) |
3,774 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.2 (-2.4, -2.1) |
2002 - 2006 |
| South Dakota |
No |
15.6 (13.2, 18.4) |
149 |
2006 |
falling |
-5.0 (-8.4, -1.6) |
2002 - 2006 |
| California |
No |
15.4 (15.0, 15.8) |
5,133 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.2 (-2.3, -2.1) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Minnesota |
No |
15.4 (14.4, 16.5) |
824 |
2006 |
falling |
-2.4 (-2.9, -2.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| New Mexico |
No |
15.4 (13.7, 17.2) |
308 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.2 (-1.5, -0.9) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Oregon |
No |
15.4 (14.2, 16.6) |
625 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.7 (-1.9, -1.5) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Rhode Island |
No |
15.0 (12.9, 17.3) |
187 |
2006 |
falling |
-7.4 (-12.6, -1.8) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Washington |
No |
14.6 (13.7, 15.6) |
927 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.7 (-8.4, -1.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Arizona |
No |
14.3 (13.4, 15.3) |
920 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.7 (-8.1, -1.0) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Hawaii |
No |
14.2 (12.4, 16.3) |
211 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Idaho |
No |
14.2 (12.3, 16.4) |
199 |
2006 |
falling |
-1.9 (-2.4, -1.4) |
2002 - 2006 |
| Utah |
Yes |
12.6 (11.0, 14.3) |
245 |
2006 |
falling |
-4.7 (-8.0, -1.4) |
2002 - 2006 |
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/23/2009 9:47 am. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).Trend Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0. Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0. Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
|
1 Healthy People 2010 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2 The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected racial groups or counties.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). The Healthy People 2010 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
|

|
|