|
 Death Rate Report by State, death years through 2009
Melanoma of the Skin
Healthy People 2020 Objective Number: C-8
Reduce the melanoma cancer death rate
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) |
State
 |
Met
Healthy People
Objective
of
2.4? 1 |
Annual
Death
Rate
over rate period
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 |
Deaths per Year
over rate period
|
Rate Period |
Recent Trend 2 |
Recent
Average Annual
Percent
Change2
in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 |
Recent Trend Period2 |
| United States |
No |
2.8 (2.8, 2.9) |
9,199 |
2009 |
stable  |
0.0 (-0.1, 0.2) |
2005 - 2009 |
| California |
No |
2.6 (2.4, 2.7) |
920 |
2009 |
falling  |
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Georgia |
Yes |
2.4 (2.1, 2.8) |
214 |
2009 |
falling |
-0.8 (-1.4, -0.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| New York |
Yes |
2.2 (2.0, 2.4) |
467 |
2009 |
falling |
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.5) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Massachusetts |
No |
3.0 (2.6, 3.5) |
223 |
2009 |
stable |
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.2) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Minnesota |
No |
2.5 (2.1, 3.0) |
144 |
2009 |
stable |
-0.2 (-0.9, 0.4) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Texas |
Yes |
2.4 (2.2, 2.6) |
535 |
2009 |
falling |
-0.2 (-0.5, -0.0) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Florida |
No |
3.0 (2.8, 3.3) |
731 |
2009 |
stable |
-0.0 (-0.3, 0.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Nevada |
No |
2.9 (2.3, 3.7) |
73 |
2009 |
stable |
-0.0 (-0.6, 0.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| New Mexico |
No |
2.7 (2.0, 3.5) |
56 |
2009 |
stable |
0.1 (-0.6, 0.7) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Arkansas |
No |
2.7 (2.2, 3.4) |
86 |
2009 |
stable |
0.2 (-0.3, 0.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Connecticut |
No |
2.5 (2.0, 3.0) |
103 |
2009 |
stable |
0.2 (-0.1, 0.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Delaware |
No |
2.7 (1.8, 4.0) |
28 |
2009 |
stable |
0.2 (-0.6, 1.0) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Hawaii |
Yes |
1.5 (0.9, 2.2) |
24 |
2009 |
stable |
0.2 (-0.7, 1.1) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Mississippi |
Yes |
2.2 (1.7, 2.8) |
70 |
2009 |
stable |
0.2 (-0.3, 0.8) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Arizona |
No |
3.3 (2.9, 3.7) |
227 |
2009 |
stable |
0.3 (-0.1, 0.7) |
2005 - 2009 |
| North Carolina |
No |
3.2 (2.9, 3.6) |
319 |
2009 |
rising  |
0.3 (0.1, 0.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Tennessee |
No |
2.9 (2.5, 3.4) |
200 |
2009 |
stable |
0.3 (-0.1, 0.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| New Jersey |
No |
2.6 (2.3, 2.9) |
246 |
2009 |
stable |
0.4 (-0.8, 1.8) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Pennsylvania |
No |
3.0 (2.8, 3.3) |
472 |
2009 |
rising |
0.4 (0.1, 0.7) |
2005 - 2009 |
| South Carolina |
No |
2.6 (2.2, 3.1) |
131 |
2009 |
stable |
0.4 (-0.0, 0.8) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Alabama |
No |
3.3 (2.8, 3.9) |
172 |
2009 |
rising |
0.5 (0.0, 0.9) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Louisiana |
Yes |
2.4 (1.9, 2.8) |
109 |
2009 |
rising |
0.5 (0.1, 1.0) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Maryland |
No |
3.0 (2.5, 3.4) |
174 |
2009 |
rising |
0.5 (0.2, 0.8) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Ohio |
No |
3.2 (2.9, 3.5) |
418 |
2009 |
rising |
0.5 (0.2, 0.8) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Idaho |
No |
3.6 (2.7, 4.6) |
57 |
2009 |
rising |
0.6 (0.2, 1.0) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Michigan |
Yes |
2.4 (2.1, 2.7) |
263 |
2009 |
rising |
0.6 (0.3, 0.9) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Utah |
No |
3.9 (3.1, 4.8) |
85 |
2009 |
rising |
0.6 (0.1, 1.2) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Vermont |
No |
3.2 (2.0, 4.8) |
24 |
2009 |
stable |
0.6 (-0.2, 1.4) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Colorado |
No |
3.6 (3.1, 4.2) |
172 |
2009 |
rising |
0.7 (0.3, 1.1) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Iowa |
No |
3.3 (2.7, 3.9) |
114 |
2009 |
rising |
0.7 (0.3, 1.1) |
2005 - 2009 |
| North Dakota |
No |
2.9 (1.8, 4.4) |
22 |
2009 |
stable |
0.7 (-0.3, 1.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Oklahoma |
No |
3.1 (2.5, 3.7) |
125 |
2009 |
rising |
0.7 (0.3, 1.0) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Rhode Island |
No |
2.7 (1.9, 3.8) |
36 |
2009 |
stable |
0.7 (-0.1, 1.4) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Virginia |
No |
3.1 (2.7, 3.5) |
251 |
2009 |
rising |
0.7 (0.4, 0.9) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Maine |
No |
3.2 (2.3, 4.2) |
50 |
2009 |
rising |
0.8 (0.3, 1.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Montana |
No |
3.3 (2.3, 4.7) |
36 |
2009 |
rising |
0.8 (0.2, 1.5) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Oregon |
No |
3.6 (3.0, 4.2) |
153 |
2009 |
rising |
0.9 (0.5, 1.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| West Virginia |
No |
3.5 (2.7, 4.4) |
76 |
2009 |
rising |
0.9 (0.3, 1.4) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Indiana |
No |
3.6 (3.2, 4.1) |
247 |
2009 |
rising |
1.0 (0.7, 1.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Missouri |
No |
3.1 (2.7, 3.6) |
210 |
2009 |
rising |
1.0 (0.7, 1.4) |
2005 - 2009 |
| New Hampshire |
No |
3.0 (2.2, 4.0) |
45 |
2009 |
rising |
1.0 (0.4, 1.6) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Wisconsin |
No |
2.6 (2.2, 3.0) |
162 |
2009 |
rising |
1.0 (0.7, 1.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Illinois |
No |
2.7 (2.4, 3.0) |
359 |
2009 |
rising |
1.1 (0.8, 1.3) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Washington |
No |
3.0 (2.6, 3.4) |
206 |
2009 |
rising |
1.1 (0.6, 1.5) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Kansas |
No |
3.2 (2.6, 3.9) |
99 |
2009 |
rising |
1.2 (0.7, 1.7) |
2005 - 2009 |
| South Dakota |
Yes |
2.0 (1.2, 3.2) |
19 |
2009 |
rising |
1.3 (0.3, 2.4) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Wyoming |
No |
3.2 (1.9, 5.1) |
19 |
2009 |
rising |
1.3 (0.4, 2.2) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Nebraska |
No |
3.2 (2.5, 4.2) |
63 |
2009 |
rising |
1.4 (0.8, 2.0) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Kentucky |
No |
3.1 (2.6, 3.7) |
142 |
2009 |
rising |
1.6 (1.2, 1.9) |
2005 - 2009 |
| Alaska |
* |
* |
15 or fewer |
2009 |
** |
** |
** |
| District of Columbia |
* |
* |
15 or fewer |
2009 |
stable |
-0.2 (-1.5, 1.1) |
2005 - 2009 |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2013 10:13 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
|
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2 The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected racial groups or counties.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas. The 1969-2009 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
|
 
|
|
