Return to Home Mortality Tables

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State, Death Years Through 2012 Cervix
Healthy People 2020 Objective Number: C-4
Reduce the death rate from cancer of the uterine cervix
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
State
sort ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 2.2? 1 Annual Death Rate
over rate period deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sorted descending, sort ascending
Average Deaths per Year
over rate period
sort descending
Rate Period Recent Trend 2 Recent Average Annual Percent Change2
in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort descending
Recent Trend Period2
United States No 2.3 (2.2, 2.4) 4,074 2012 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) 2008 - 2012
District of Columbia No 5.3 (3.1, 8.6) 18 2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.6) 2008 - 2012
Oklahoma No 4.3 (3.4, 5.3) 84 2012 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4) 2008 - 2012
Mississippi No 3.8 (2.9, 4.8) 63 2012 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2) 2008 - 2012
West Virginia No 3.4 (2.4, 4.8) 37 2012 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.8, -0.6) 2008 - 2012
Arkansas No 3.2 (2.4, 4.2) 52 2012 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1) 2008 - 2012
Georgia No 3.0 (2.6, 3.5) 161 2012 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) 2008 - 2012
Alabama No 2.9 (2.3, 3.7) 78 2012 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2) 2008 - 2012
Florida No 2.8 (2.5, 3.2) 337 2012 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.1, 6.6) 2008 - 2012
Texas No 2.8 (2.5, 3.1) 367 2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.4, -1.7) 2008 - 2012
Indiana No 2.7 (2.2, 3.3) 100 2012 stable stable trend 5.2 (-3.8, 15.1) 2008 - 2012
Missouri No 2.7 (2.2, 3.3) 96 2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.4) 2008 - 2012
Kentucky No 2.6 (2.0, 3.3) 68 2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.8) 2008 - 2012
Louisiana No 2.6 (2.0, 3.3) 65 2012 stable stable trend -7.3 (-14.7, 0.7) 2008 - 2012
New York No 2.6 (2.3, 2.9) 296 2012 stable stable trend 3.0 (-6.0, 12.8) 2008 - 2012
Kansas No 2.5 (1.7, 3.5) 38 2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.3) 2008 - 2012
New Mexico No 2.5 (1.7, 3.7) 29 2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8) 2008 - 2012
Ohio No 2.4 (2.0, 2.8) 162 2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-10.9, 1.4) 2008 - 2012
South Carolina No 2.4 (1.8, 3.0) 66 2012 stable stable trend -5.7 (-13.3, 2.5) 2008 - 2012
New Jersey No 2.3 (1.9, 2.8) 126 2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6) 2008 - 2012
Illinois Yes 2.2 (1.9, 2.6) 167 2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8) 2008 - 2012
Tennessee Yes 2.2 (1.8, 2.8) 81 2012 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9) 2008 - 2012
California Yes 2.1 (1.9, 2.3) 424 2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9) 2008 - 2012
Maine Yes 2.1 (1.2, 3.5) 17 2012 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.2, 2.2) 2008 - 2012
Nevada Yes 2.1 (1.4, 3.0) 32 2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.1) 2008 - 2012
Arizona Yes 2.0 (1.6, 2.6) 73 2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4) 2008 - 2012
Maryland Yes 2.0 (1.6, 2.6) 73 2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.1) 2008 - 2012
Michigan Yes 2.0 (1.6, 2.4) 114 2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.0) 2008 - 2012
North Carolina Yes 2.0 (1.7, 2.5) 117 2012 falling falling trend -3.4 (-3.9, -2.9) 2008 - 2012
Pennsylvania Yes 2.0 (1.7, 2.4) 157 2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.4, -2.4) 2008 - 2012
Connecticut Yes 1.9 (1.3, 2.6) 40 2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.4, -1.3) 2008 - 2012
Washington Yes 1.9 (1.5, 2.4) 70 2012 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9) 2008 - 2012
Nebraska Yes 1.8 (1.0, 2.9) 17 2012 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3) 2008 - 2012
Utah Yes 1.8 (1.1, 2.7) 22 2012 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.9) 2008 - 2012
Virginia Yes 1.8 (1.4, 2.2) 83 2012 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.0, -2.6) 2008 - 2012
Iowa Yes 1.6 (1.0, 2.3) 27 2012 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2) 2008 - 2012
Wisconsin Yes 1.6 (1.2, 2.1) 55 2012 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.8) 2008 - 2012
Colorado Yes 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) 39 2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -1.9) 2008 - 2012
Minnesota Yes 1.3 (0.9, 1.8) 39 2012 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8) 2008 - 2012
Massachusetts Yes 1.2 (0.9, 1.7) 53 2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.7, -3.0) 2008 - 2012
Oregon Yes 1.1 (0.7, 1.7) 25 2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9) 2008 - 2012
Alaska * * 15 or fewer 2012 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.7, 2.7) 2008 - 2012
Delaware * * 15 or fewer 2012 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.5, -1.5) 2008 - 2012
Hawaii * * 15 or fewer 2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.5) 2008 - 2012
Idaho * * 15 or fewer 2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3) 2008 - 2012
Montana * * 15 or fewer 2012 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.8) 2008 - 2012
New Hampshire * * 15 or fewer 2012 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.2, -2.7) 2008 - 2012
North Dakota * * 15 or fewer 2012 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.2, -2.9) 2008 - 2012
Rhode Island * * 15 or fewer 2012 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.1, -2.7) 2008 - 2012
South Dakota * * 15 or fewer 2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.2) 2008 - 2012
Vermont * * 15 or fewer 2012 falling falling trend -6.1 (-8.9, -3.3) 2008 - 2012
Wyoming * * 15 or fewer 2012 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.1, 3.4) 2008 - 2012
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/04/2015 2:48 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates.
1 Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2 The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program (Version 4.2). Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.