Speech users and low vision users click here for help on using this Web siteSkip to main content
National Cancer Institute logo State Cancer Profiles. Dynamic views of cancer statistics for prioritizing cancer control efforts in the nation, states, and counties Help us improve. Contact us with feedback Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Logo
 Profiles HomeDeath Rates
National Cancer Institute State Cancer Profiles Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
   
Area:  
Cancer:  
Race/Ethn:  
Sex:  
about this table page opens in new windowAbout this Table
quick reference guide opens in new windowQuick Reference Guide
tutorial opens in new windowTutorial
  
data use restrictions open in new windowData Use Restrictions

data table opens in new windowtext interpretation of graph/table opens in new windowprintable view opens in new windowexport data page opens in new window
Death Rate Report by State, death years through 2006

Cervix
Healthy People 2010 Objective Number: 03-04
Reduce the death rate from cancer of the uterine cervix.
All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
sort ascending
Met
Healthy People
Objective
of
2.0?
1
Annual
Death
Rate

over rate period
deaths per 100,000

(95% Confidence Interval)
sorted descending, sort ascending
Deaths per Year
over rate period
sort descending
Rate Period Recent Trend 2 Recent
Average Annual
Percent
Change
2
in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort descending
Recent Trend Period2
United States No 2.4 (2.3, 2.5) 3,976 2006 stable  -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3) 2002 - 2006
Mississippi No 4.7 (3.7, 5.9) 73 2006 falling  -1.7 (-2.1, -1.3) 2002 - 2006
Louisiana No 3.5 (2.7, 4.4) 79 2006 falling  -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7) 2002 - 2006
Nevada No 3.3 (2.4, 4.5) 41 2006 falling  -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2) 2002 - 2006
Texas No 3.0 (2.7, 3.3) 342 2006 falling  -2.2 (-2.9, -1.5) 2002 - 2006
Arkansas No 2.9 (2.2, 4.0) 47 2006 falling  -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1) 2002 - 2006
Missouri No 2.9 (2.4, 3.6) 92 2006 falling  -2.6 (-3.0, -2.2) 2002 - 2006
New Jersey No 2.9 (2.4, 3.4) 148 2006 falling  -2.0 (-2.4, -1.7) 2002 - 2006
Florida No 2.8 (2.5, 3.2) 303 2006 falling  -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1) 2002 - 2006
New Mexico No 2.8 (1.9, 4.1) 29 2006 falling  -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9) 2002 - 2006
Oklahoma No 2.8 (2.1, 3.7) 56 2006 falling  -1.7 (-2.1, -1.2) 2002 - 2006
Alabama No 2.7 (2.1, 3.4) 72 2006 falling  -3.5 (-3.9, -3.2) 2002 - 2006
Georgia No 2.6 (2.1, 3.1) 123 2006 falling  -3.0 (-3.4, -2.7) 2002 - 2006
Ohio No 2.6 (2.2, 3.0) 170 2006 falling  -2.9 (-3.3, -2.6) 2002 - 2006
Pennsylvania No 2.6 (2.3, 3.0) 197 2006 falling  -3.2 (-4.1, -2.3) 2002 - 2006
South Carolina No 2.6 (2.0, 3.3) 62 2006 falling  -3.2 (-3.7, -2.7) 2002 - 2006
California No 2.5 (2.3, 2.7) 460 2006 stable  0.0 (-4.5, 4.8) 2002 - 2006
Hawaii No 2.5 (1.5, 4.0) 18 2006 falling  -1.7 (-2.7, -0.7) 2002 - 2006
Illinois No 2.5 (2.1, 2.9) 173 2006 falling  -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0) 2002 - 2006
Indiana No 2.5 (2.0, 3.1) 85 2006 falling  -3.3 (-3.6, -2.9) 2002 - 2006
New York No 2.5 (2.2, 2.8) 281 2006 falling  -2.3 (-2.5, -2.0) 2002 - 2006
Kansas No 2.3 (1.6, 3.3) 34 2006 falling  -2.6 (-3.1, -2.0) 2002 - 2006
Tennessee No 2.3 (1.8, 2.9) 79 2006 falling  -2.6 (-2.9, -2.2) 2002 - 2006
Iowa No 2.2 (1.6, 3.1) 40 2006 falling  -2.6 (-3.1, -2.1) 2002 - 2006
Kentucky No 2.2 (1.7, 2.9) 53 2006 falling  -3.0 (-3.6, -2.5) 2002 - 2006
Maryland No 2.2 (1.7, 2.8) 69 2006 falling  -3.3 (-3.8, -2.9) 2002 - 2006
New Hampshire No 2.2 (1.3, 3.6) 17 2006 falling  -3.6 (-4.6, -2.5) 2002 - 2006
North Carolina No 2.2 (1.8, 2.7) 107 2006 falling  -3.4 (-3.7, -3.1) 2002 - 2006
West Virginia No 2.2 (1.4, 3.4) 23 2006 falling  -2.9 (-3.4, -2.4) 2002 - 2006
Colorado No 2.1 (1.5, 2.7) 52 2006 falling  -2.6 (-3.1, -2.0) 2002 - 2006
Washington No 2.1 (1.6, 2.6) 70 2006 falling  -2.9 (-3.4, -2.5) 2002 - 2006
Connecticut Yes 1.9 (1.3, 2.6) 38 2006 falling  -2.5 (-3.1, -1.9) 2002 - 2006
Virginia Yes 1.9 (1.5, 2.3) 78 2006 falling  -3.3 (-3.7, -3.0) 2002 - 2006
Arizona Yes 1.8 (1.3, 2.3) 56 2006 falling  -2.5 (-3.0, -1.9) 2002 - 2006
Michigan Yes 1.8 (1.5, 2.2) 101 2006 falling  -3.0 (-3.5, -2.6) 2002 - 2006
Wisconsin Yes 1.8 (1.4, 2.4) 56 2006 falling  -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6) 2002 - 2006
Oregon Yes 1.7 (1.2, 2.4) 37 2006 falling  -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6) 2002 - 2006
Minnesota Yes 1.6 (1.1, 2.1) 45 2006 falling  -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8) 2002 - 2006
Nebraska Yes 1.6 (0.9, 2.7) 16 2006 falling  -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4) 2002 - 2006
Utah Yes 1.5 (0.9, 2.5) 16 2006 falling  -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1) 2002 - 2006
Massachusetts Yes 1.3 (1.0, 1.8) 50 2006 falling  -3.4 (-3.7, -3.0) 2002 - 2006
Alaska
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 **
**
**
Delaware
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -2.2 (-3.2, -1.3) 2002 - 2006
District of Columbia
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -3.0 (-3.8, -2.1) 2002 - 2006
Idaho
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -2.7 (-4.4, -0.9) 2002 - 2006
Maine
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -4.3 (-5.1, -3.5) 2002 - 2006
Montana
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -2.7 (-3.7, -1.8) 2002 - 2006
North Dakota
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -2.5 (-3.9, -1.0) 2002 - 2006
Rhode Island
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -2.6 (-3.7, -1.5) 2002 - 2006
South Dakota
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9) 2002 - 2006
Vermont
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 falling  -3.1 (-4.4, -1.7) 2002 - 2006
Wyoming
*
*
15 or fewer
2006 stable  -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5) 2002 - 2006
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/23/2009 9:49 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Healthy People 2010 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
2 The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected racial groups or counties.

Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). The Healthy People 2010 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.

export data page opens in new windowExport Data
map of this data opens in new windowMake Map
text interpretation of graph/table opens in new windowInterpret
 
printable view opens in new windowPrintable View
Profiles Home   FAQ   Contact Us   Dictionary   Accessibility   Privacy Policy