Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, death years through 2006 Utah Counties versus United States
Prostate All Races, Male
Above US Rate
Similar to US Rate
Below US Rate
Rising Trend
Priority 1: rising and above
[none]
Priority 2: rising and similar
[none]
Priority 3: rising and below
[none]
Stable Trend
Priority 4: stable and above
Davis County
Priority 6: stable and similar
Utah County
Priority 7: stable and below
[none]
Falling Trend
Priority 5: falling and above
[none]
Priority 8: falling and similar
Utah Salt Lake County Weber County
Priority 9: falling and below
Cache County
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/09/2010 6:38 pm.
Trend2 Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0. Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0. Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0. Rate Comparison Above when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10 Similar when unable to conclude above or below with confidence. Below when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate. 2 Recent trend in death rates is Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected racial groups or counties. 3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates: Beaver County, Box Elder County, Carbon County, Daggett County, Duchesne County, Emery County, Garfield County, Grand County, Juab County, Kane County, Millard County, Morgan County, Piute County, Rich County, San Juan County, Sanpete County, Sevier County, Summit County, Tooele County, Uintah County, Wasatch County, Wayne County
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/09/2010 6:38 pm.
Trend2 Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0. Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0. Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0. Rate Comparison Above when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10 Similar when unable to conclude above or below with confidence. Below when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate. 2 Recent trend in death rates is Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected racial groups or counties. 3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates: Thyroid (Females), Thyroid (Males)
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates: Childhood (Ages <15, All Sites) (Females), Childhood (Ages <15, All Sites) (Males), Childhood (Ages <20, All Sites) (Females), Childhood (Ages <20, All Sites) (Males), Esophagus (Females), Oral Cavity & Pharynx (Females)
Death Rate Report for Utah by County, death years through 2006
Prostate Healthy People 2010 Objective Number: 03-07
Reduce the prostate cancer death rate.
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages Sorted by Rate
County
Met Healthy People Objective of 28.8?1
Annual Death Rate over rate period deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
Average Deaths per Year over rate period
Rate Period
Recent Trend2
Recent Average Annual Percent Change2 in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/09/2010 6:38 pm. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0. Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0. Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. ** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend. 1Healthy People 2010 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2 The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected racial groups or counties.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). The Healthy People 2010 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, Prostate, All Ages Sorted by Rate
County
Annual Incidence Rate† over rate period (95% Confidence Interval)
Average Annual Count
Rate Period
Utah
182.2 (178.0, 186.4)
1,506
2002-2006
US (SEER+NPCR)
155.3 (155.0, 155.6)
§
2002-2006
Cache County
258.0 (231.8, 286.2)
72
2002-2006
Box Elder County
231.9 (202.0, 264.9)
44
2002-2006
Wayne County
219.5 (124.0, 362.2)
3
2002-2006
Iron County
211.0 (177.1, 249.1)
28
2002-2006
Sanpete County
204.1 (165.9, 248.2)
20
2002-2006
Davis County
198.6 (184.9, 213.0)
166
2002-2006
Garfield County
189.9 (118.1, 289.8)
5
2002-2006
Beaver County
187.7 (124.7, 271.1)
6
2002-2006
Salt Lake County
186.6 (179.7, 193.6)
587
2002-2006
Wasatch County
180.7 (137.2, 232.9)
12
2002-2006
Sevier County
180.0 (143.7, 222.8)
17
2002-2006
Carbon County
173.2 (137.8, 215.0)
17
2002-2006
Summit County
173.1 (136.3, 216.1)
22
2002-2006
Duchesne County
169.5 (125.7, 223.4)
11
2002-2006
Tooele County
168.0 (138.9, 201.1)
25
2002-2006
Weber County
168.0 (155.5, 181.2)
135
2002-2006
Washington County
168.0 (153.6, 183.4)
105
2002-2006
Utah County
164.8 (153.9, 176.2)
174
2002-2006
Kane County
154.6 (106.2, 220.6)
7
2002-2006
Morgan County
154.5 (96.2, 233.6)
5
2002-2006
Grand County
145.7 (99.7, 206.0)
7
2002-2006
Emery County
135.7 (94.6, 189.2)
7
2002-2006
Juab County
133.2 (84.3, 199.3)
5
2002-2006
Uintah County
129.6 (99.7, 165.2)
13
2002-2006
San Juan County
111.1 (74.8, 158.3)
6
2002-2006
Millard County
102.5 (69.0, 146.7)
6
2002-2006
Daggett County
*
3 or fewer
2002-2006
Piute County
*
3 or fewer
2002-2006
Rich County
*
3 or fewer
2002-2006
Notes: Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/09/2010 6:38 pm. State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. † Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US populations included with the data release have been adjusted for the population shifts due to hurricanes Katrina and Rita for 62 counties and parishes in Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana, and Texas (See US Population Data - 1969-2005 for more information). § Data not provided because it did not meet USCS publication standards for one or more years during the rate period of data collection. American Cancer Society's Facts & Figures provides estimates of numbers of new cancer cases and deaths. * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.
1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2008/January 2009 data submission and SEER November 2008 submission. 3 Source: SEER November 2008 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries. 7 Source: SEER November 2008 submission.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic affect on the calculated rate.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
and above 
and above 
