Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, death years through 2012
Nevada Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites
All Races, Both Sexes
Sorted by Priority Index
County
sort state ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

sort index descending
Recent
Trend2

County Death Rate
Compared to
US Rate

Average Deaths per year
2008-2012

sort count ascending
Annual
Death
Rate
2008-2012

deaths per 100,000

(95% Confidence Interval)
sort death rate ascending
Rate
Ratio3
County to USsort ascending by the rate ratio
Recent Average Annual
Percent Change2
in Death Rates

(95% Confidence Interval)
sort AAPC ascending
Recent Trend Period2
United States-falling  -573,421171.2 (171.0, 171.4)-0.0-1.5 (-1.6, -1.5)2008 - 2012
Nevada8falling  similar  4,522172.4 (170.1, 174.7)1.0-2.0 (-2.3, -1.6)2008 - 2012
Churchill County4stable  above  62212.3 (188.9, 237.9)1.20.3 (-0.7, 1.3)2008 - 2012
Mineral County4stable  above  19239.7 (192.6, 297.3)1.40.2 (-1.2, 1.6)2008 - 2012
Nye County4stable  above  147208.5 (192.7, 225.4)1.20.3 (-0.6, 1.2)2008 - 2012
Carson City5falling  above  141193.5 (179.3, 208.6)1.1-1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)2008 - 2012
Lyon County5falling  above  123202.9 (186.5, 220.3)1.2-1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)2008 - 2012
Humboldt County6stable  similar  27196.2 (163.3, 233.5)1.1-0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)2008 - 2012
Storey County6stable  similar  8146.4 (100.0, 209.4)0.9-2.2 (-5.4, 1.2)2008 - 2012
White Pine County6stable  similar  21181.3 (148.2, 220.0)1.1-0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)2008 - 2012
Clark County8falling  similar  3,047170.1 (167.3, 172.9)1.0-1.8 (-1.9, -1.6)2008 - 2012
Elko County8falling  similar  59161.2 (142.1, 182.0)0.9-1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)2008 - 2012
Lincoln County8falling  similar  9132.4 (96.0, 179.5)0.8-2.4 (-3.8, -0.9)2008 - 2012
Washoe County8falling  similar  729172.7 (167.0, 178.5)1.0-1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)2008 - 2012
Douglas County9falling  below  106146.5 (133.9, 160.1)0.9-1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)2008 - 2012
Lander County9falling  below  7122.7 (83.3, 174.0)0.7-8.0 (-12.7, -2.9)2008 - 2012
Pershing County9falling  below  9128.9 (92.2, 175.5)0.8-2.6 (-4.6, -0.5)2008 - 2012
Esmeralda County
**
**
similar  4295.2 (176.7, 496.2)1.7
**
**
Eureka County
**
**
similar  4203.0 (116.3, 327.2)1.2
**
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/03/2015 9:21 pm.
Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trendestimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program (Version 4.2). Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate.

Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).