Speech users and low vision users click here for help on using this Web siteSkip to main content
National Cancer Institute logo State Cancer Profiles. Dynamic views of cancer statistics for prioritizing cancer control efforts in the nation, states, and counties Help us improve. Contact us with feedback Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Logo
 Profiles Home > Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer
National Cancer Institute State Cancer Profiles Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
 
about this graph page opens in new windowAbout this Graph
quick reference guide opens in new windowQuick Reference Guide
tutorial opens in new windowTutorial
  
data use restrictions open in new windowData Use Restrictions
 
Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, death years through 2010
Oklahoma Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus
All Races, Both Sexes

  Above US Rate Similar to US Rate Below US Rate  
Rising
Trend
Priority 1: rising and above

[none]
 
Priority 2: rising and similar

Pawnee County
Washita County 
Priority 3: rising and below

[none]
 
 
Stable
Trend
Priority 4: stable and above

Adair County
Blaine County
Bryan County
Caddo County
Carter County
Cherokee County
Choctaw County
Cleveland County
Comanche County
Craig County
Creek County
Delaware County
Garvin County
Grady County
Haskell County
Hughes County
Jackson County
Johnston County
Kay County
Le Flore County
Lincoln County
Marshall County
Mayes County
McCurtain County
McIntosh County
Muskogee County
Okmulgee County
Osage County
Ottawa County
Pittsburg County
Pontotoc County
Pottawatomie County
Pushmataha County
Rogers County
Seminole County
Sequoyah County
Tillman County
Wagoner County 
Priority 6: stable and similar

Alfalfa County
Beckham County
Coal County
Cotton County
Custer County
Dewey County
Garfield County
Greer County
Jefferson County
Kingfisher County
Kiowa County
Latimer County
Love County
Major County
McClain County
Noble County
Nowata County
Okfuskee County
Payne County
Washington County
Woodward County 
Priority 7: stable and below

Texas County 
 
Falling
Trend
Priority 5: falling and above

Oklahoma
Oklahoma County 
Priority 8: falling and similar

Atoka County
Canadian County
Logan County
Murray County
Stephens County
Tulsa County 
Priority 9: falling and below

[none]
 
 
  Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/24/2014 7:00 am.
Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90


1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate.

Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1–4, 5–9, … , 80–84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2011 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.

Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Beaver County, Cimarron County, Harmon County, Roger Mills County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Ellis County, Grant County, Harper County, Woods County
 
[D]
data table opens in new windowData Table
export data page opens in new windowExport Data
text interpretation of graph/table opens in new windowInterpret
printable view opens in new windowPrintable View

Profiles Home   FAQ   Contact Us   Dictionary   File Formats   FOIA   Accessibility   Privacy Policy  

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute USA.gov

NIH…Turning Discovery Into Health®