Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Minnesota | No | 143.8 (142.4, 145.1) | N/A | 9,192 | falling | -1.5 (-1.6, -1.3) |
United States 6 | No | 154.4 (154.1, 154.6) | N/A | 464,265 | falling | -1.9 (-2.0, -1.7) |
Todd County | Yes | 121.8 (106.0, 139.7) | 87 (43, 87) | 47 | falling | -2.9 (-4.0, -1.8) |
Murray County | Yes | 122.4 (98.2, 152.7) | 86 (14, 87) | 19 | stable | -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1) |
Carver County | No | 123.6 (113.6, 134.2) | 85 (62, 87) | 121 | falling | -1.5 (-2.0, -1.1) |
Olmsted County | No | 128.0 (120.5, 135.9) | 84 (60, 87) | 225 | falling | -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4) |
Houston County | No | 129.1 (110.5, 150.5) | 83 (18, 87) | 38 | falling | -1.3 (-1.8, -0.8) |
Pope County | No | 130.5 (106.3, 159.4) | 82 (9, 87) | 24 | falling | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3) |
Roseau County | No | 132.8 (111.1, 158.0) | 81 (10, 87) | 28 | falling | -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
Hennepin County | No | 133.5 (130.5, 136.5) | 80 (62, 82) | 1,618 | falling | -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8) |
Nicollet County | No | 135.2 (119.3, 152.7) | 79 (19, 87) | 55 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
Steele County | No | 136.2 (121.6, 152.4) | 78 (18, 87) | 66 | falling | -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
Dakota County | No | 137.4 (132.4, 142.6) | 77 (50, 81) | 594 | falling | -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2) |
McLeod County | No | 137.6 (123.3, 153.4) | 76 (18, 87) | 70 | falling | -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1) |
Scott County | No | 138.4 (128.8, 148.4) | 75 (31, 84) | 165 | falling | -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
Otter Tail County | No | 138.7 (128.0, 150.2) | 74 (28, 85) | 140 | falling | -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
Dodge County | No | 139.0 (118.1, 162.8) | 73 (7, 87) | 32 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.0) |
Lac qui Parle County | No | 139.2 (107.7, 179.1) | 72 (2, 87) | 17 | falling | -1.6 (-2.5, -0.6) |
Marshall County | No | 140.1 (113.7, 171.9) | 71 (4, 87) | 22 | falling | -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
Cook County | No | 140.4 (105.4, 187.4) | 70 (1, 87) | 13 | stable | -1.5 (-3.3, 0.3) |
Washington County | No | 140.5 (134.2, 147.1) | 69 (37, 79) | 388 | falling | -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0) |
Jackson County | No | 140.6 (114.5, 172.0) | 68 (3, 87) | 23 | stable | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
Lake of the Woods County | No | 140.7 (100.2, 196.5) | 67 (1, 87) | 9 | stable | -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4) |
Redwood County | No | 140.8 (119.1, 165.9) | 66 (5, 87) | 33 | falling | -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
Beltrami County | No | 140.8 (126.0, 157.1) | 65 (13, 86) | 70 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5) |
Stevens County | No | 142.4 (112.0, 179.3) | 64 (2, 87) | 17 | stable | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5) |
Ramsey County | No | 142.7 (138.0, 147.5) | 63 (38, 74) | 742 | falling | -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6) |
Blue Earth County | No | 142.7 (130.2, 156.2) | 62 (15, 84) | 101 | falling | -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8) |
Pennington County | No | 143.7 (119.9, 171.3) | 61 (4, 87) | 28 | falling | -0.9 (-1.7, -0.2) |
Red Lake County | No | 143.9 (104.1, 197.2) | 60 (1, 87) | 9 | stable | -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6) |
Carlton County | No | 144.4 (129.1, 161.3) | 59 (10, 85) | 67 | falling | -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
Waseca County | No | 144.7 (123.8, 168.6) | 58 (5, 87) | 36 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5) |
Stearns County | No | 145.2 (137.2, 153.5) | 57 (24, 77) | 260 | falling | -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7) |
Wabasha County | No | 145.3 (127.5, 165.4) | 56 (6, 86) | 50 | falling | -1.1 (-1.6, -0.5) |
Becker County | No | 145.4 (130.4, 162.1) | 55 (9, 84) | 72 | falling | -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Kandiyohi County | No | 145.6 (131.1, 161.6) | 54 (10, 85) | 83 | falling | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.6) |
Rice County | No | 145.8 (133.6, 158.9) | 53 (14, 83) | 111 | falling | -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
Clay County | No | 145.9 (132.8, 160.0) | 52 (13, 83) | 96 | falling | -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1) |
Lake County | No | 146.0 (122.0, 174.6) | 51 (2, 87) | 30 | falling | -1.6 (-2.2, -0.9) |
Lyon County | No | 146.0 (127.0, 167.2) | 50 (5, 87) | 46 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4) |
Sherburne County | No | 148.3 (136.7, 160.6) | 49 (12, 80) | 129 | falling | -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7) |
Mower County | No | 149.0 (134.2, 165.2) | 48 (8, 83) | 82 | falling | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
Freeborn County | No | 149.0 (133.2, 166.6) | 47 (7, 83) | 73 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
Wright County | No | 149.3 (140.0, 159.0) | 46 (16, 74) | 198 | falling | -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
Koochiching County | No | 149.3 (126.4, 176.4) | 45 (2, 87) | 34 | falling | -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3) |
Big Stone County | No | 149.5 (115.8, 193.2) | 44 (1, 87) | 15 | falling | -1.6 (-2.5, -0.8) |
Anoka County | No | 150.1 (144.3, 156.0) | 43 (22, 65) | 539 | falling | -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
Kittson County | No | 150.1 (112.7, 199.5) | 42 (1, 87) | 12 | stable | -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4) |
Hubbard County | No | 150.6 (132.2, 171.4) | 41 (4, 84) | 55 | falling | -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5) |
Fillmore County | No | 151.1 (131.9, 172.6) | 40 (4, 85) | 50 | falling | -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3) |
Benton County | No | 151.8 (135.6, 169.4) | 39 (4, 82) | 68 | falling | -1.4 (-2.0, -0.8) |
Cottonwood County | No | 152.2 (127.7, 181.4) | 38 (2, 86) | 30 | stable | -0.3 (-1.0, 0.3) |
Winona County | No | 153.0 (139.1, 168.0) | 37 (7, 79) | 96 | falling | -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
Pipestone County | No | 153.2 (125.3, 186.9) | 36 (1, 87) | 23 | stable | -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3) |
Grant County | No | 153.4 (116.4, 199.9) | 35 (1, 87) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1) |
Traverse County | No | 153.7 (113.4, 210.7) | 34 (1, 87) | 11 | stable | -0.6 (-2.0, 0.9) |
Crow Wing County | No | 153.8 (142.8, 165.4) | 33 (8, 71) | 159 | falling | -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6) |
Pine County | No | 153.8 (137.6, 171.8) | 32 (5, 81) | 69 | falling | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4) |
Cass County | No | 154.6 (138.3, 172.8) | 31 (4, 81) | 76 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
Morrison County | No | 155.3 (139.6, 172.6) | 30 (4, 80) | 76 | falling | -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Swift County | No | 155.4 (126.5, 190.1) | 29 (1, 87) | 23 | falling | -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7) |
Kanabec County | No | 155.6 (133.2, 181.2) | 28 (2, 85) | 37 | falling | -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
Douglas County | No | 156.3 (142.1, 171.7) | 27 (5, 75) | 97 | stable | -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0) |
Isanti County | No | 156.3 (140.8, 173.2) | 26 (4, 78) | 77 | stable | -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1) |
Clearwater County | No | 156.4 (125.6, 193.7) | 25 (1, 87) | 19 | stable | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
Mahnomen County | No | 157.0 (107.9, 226.0) | 24 (1, 87) | 8 | falling | -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5) |
Renville County | No | 157.0 (134.0, 183.7) | 23 (1, 85) | 36 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1) |
Yellow Medicine County | No | 157.6 (128.9, 191.8) | 22 (1, 87) | 24 | stable | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Meeker County | No | 157.7 (139.1, 178.5) | 21 (2, 81) | 55 | falling | -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
Goodhue County | No | 158.0 (144.5, 172.6) | 20 (4, 73) | 108 | falling | -0.8 (-1.2, -0.4) |
St. Louis County | No | 158.4 (151.6, 165.4) | 19 (9, 49) | 447 | falling | -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
Aitkin County | No | 160.0 (139.5, 183.8) | 18 (1, 82) | 55 | falling | -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) |
Rock County | No | 160.3 (131.5, 194.6) | 17 (1, 86) | 23 | stable | -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Chisago County | No | 161.2 (147.5, 176.0) | 16 (4, 67) | 106 | stable | 6.2 (-5.2, 19.1) |
Le Sueur County | No | 161.3 (143.2, 181.4) | 15 (2, 78) | 60 | falling | -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2) |
Itasca County | No | 161.5 (148.0, 176.1) | 14 (3, 66) | 117 | falling | -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8) |
Brown County | No | 164.4 (145.9, 185.0) | 13 (1, 73) | 66 | stable | -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1) |
Martin County | No | 164.7 (144.8, 187.2) | 12 (1, 77) | 57 | stable | -0.4 (-1.2, 0.3) |
Sibley County | No | 165.2 (140.4, 193.8) | 11 (1, 81) | 34 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Nobles County | No | 168.6 (145.0, 195.9) | 10 (1, 79) | 41 | stable | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2) |
Norman County | No | 169.0 (134.2, 211.9) | 9 (1, 87) | 18 | stable | -0.8 (-1.7, 0.2) |
Watonwan County | No | 170.3 (138.5, 208.6) | 8 (1, 84) | 25 | stable | -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5) |
Lincoln County | No | 171.3 (134.0, 217.7) | 7 (1, 86) | 18 | stable | 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6) |
Polk County | No | 172.5 (154.8, 191.9) | 6 (1, 55) | 74 | stable | -1.2 (-12.7, 11.8) |
Wilkin County | No | 173.5 (136.3, 219.4) | 5 (1, 87) | 16 | stable | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Faribault County | No | 173.8 (148.7, 202.8) | 4 (1, 75) | 40 | stable | 0.1 (-0.4, 0.7) |
Wadena County | No | 184.0 (157.9, 213.7) | 3 (1, 58) | 40 | stable | -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6) |
Mille Lacs County | No | 186.3 (165.8, 208.9) | 2 (1, 35) | 63 | stable | -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1) |
Chippewa County | No | 191.0 (162.4, 224.2) | 1 (1, 58) | 36 | stable | 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/10/2024 5:44 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/10/2024 5:44 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
6 Hispanic mortality recent trend data for the United States has been excluded for the following states: Louisiana, New Hampshire, and Oklahoma. The data on Hispanic and non-Hispanic mortality for these states may be unreliable for the time period used in the generation of the recent trend (1990 - 2020) and has been excluded from the calculation of the United States recent trend. This was based on the NCHS Policy.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.