Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options
Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Leukemia, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort alphabetically by name descending 		2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
sort by rural urban descending 		Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
 Age-Adjusted Death Rate †
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by CI rank descending 		Average Annual Count
sort by count descending 		Recent Trend
 Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
Indiana N/A *** 6.5 (6.2, 6.7) N/A 517 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -1.3)
United States N/A *** 5.9 (5.8, 5.9) N/A 23,472 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Adams County Rural *** 6.8 (3.9, 11.4) 27 (2, 47) 3 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.8)
Allen County Urban *** 6.9 (5.8, 8.2) 25 (7, 41) 29 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Bartholomew County Urban *** 5.3 (3.4, 7.8) 44 (10, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.5)
Boone County Urban *** 8.3 (5.5, 11.9) 6 (1, 46) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.7)
Cass County Rural *** 7.7 (4.7, 12.1) 16 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Clark County Urban *** 7.2 (5.3, 9.5) 18 (3, 46) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.4)
Clinton County Rural *** 15.0 (10.0, 21.7) 1 (1, 17) 6
*
*
DeKalb County Rural *** 7.8 (4.7, 12.3) 15 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.2)
Dearborn County Urban *** 6.4 (3.9, 10.0) 32 (3, 47) 4
*
*
Delaware County Urban *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.4) 36 (6, 47) 9 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.6, -1.3)
Dubois County Rural *** 8.1 (5.0, 12.5) 8 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 2.2)
Elkhart County Urban *** 5.1 (3.9, 6.6) 46 (19, 47) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.7)
Floyd County Urban *** 9.1 (6.5, 12.3) 4 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Gibson County Rural *** 10.3 (6.3, 16.0) 3 (1, 45) 4
*
*
Grant County Rural *** 8.7 (6.1, 12.1) 5 (1, 44) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.9, 2.7)
Hamilton County Urban *** 6.6 (5.4, 8.0) 29 (9, 44) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.8)
Hancock County Urban *** 6.5 (4.4, 9.3) 30 (4, 47) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.2, 1.3)
Harrison County Urban *** 8.0 (4.7, 12.8) 11 (1, 47) 4
*
*
Hendricks County Urban *** 7.0 (5.3, 9.0) 24 (4, 45) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -0.6)
Henry County Rural *** 5.3 (3.0, 8.7) 45 (5, 47) 3
*
*
Howard County Urban *** 7.0 (5.0, 9.7) 21 (3, 47) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Huntington County Rural *** 7.1 (4.2, 11.5) 20 (2, 47) 4
*
*
Jackson County Rural *** 7.0 (4.3, 11.0) 22 (2, 47) 4
*
*
Jefferson County Rural *** 8.2 (4.7, 13.4) 7 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Johnson County Urban *** 5.5 (4.1, 7.3) 43 (13, 47) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.6)
Knox County Rural *** 8.0 (4.7, 13.0) 9 (1, 47) 4 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 2.0)
Kosciusko County Rural *** 5.7 (3.8, 8.2) 41 (7, 47) 6 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.5)
LaPorte County Urban *** 6.0 (4.2, 8.2) 39 (7, 47) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Lake County Urban *** 6.5 (5.6, 7.5) 31 (12, 43) 40 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Lawrence County Rural *** 7.2 (4.4, 11.3) 19 (2, 47) 4
*
*
Madison County Urban *** 8.0 (6.2, 10.3) 10 (2, 41) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Marion County Urban *** 5.8 (5.1, 6.5) 40 (23, 45) 55 falling falling trend -3.6 (-13.1, -1.2)
Miami County Rural *** 7.0 (4.0, 11.6) 23 (2, 47) 3
*
*
Monroe County Urban *** 5.6 (4.0, 7.7) 42 (9, 47) 8 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Montgomery County Rural *** 6.6 (3.7, 11.1) 28 (2, 47) 3
*
*
Morgan County Urban *** 7.9 (5.5, 11.1) 12 (2, 46) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 2.1)
Porter County Urban *** 4.9 (3.7, 6.5) 47 (19, 47) 10 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.6, 0.1)
Putnam County Rural *** 10.8 (6.9, 16.1) 2 (1, 41) 5
*
*
Shelby County Urban *** 6.2 (3.7, 10.0) 35 (3, 47) 4 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 2.0)
St. Joseph County Urban *** 6.0 (4.9, 7.4) 38 (12, 47) 19 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.5, 0.3)
Tippecanoe County Urban *** 7.2 (5.5, 9.4) 17 (4, 45) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Vanderburgh County Urban *** 7.9 (6.3, 9.7) 14 (3, 40) 18 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Vigo County Urban *** 6.2 (4.5, 8.5) 34 (6, 47) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-12.2, -1.2)
Wabash County Rural *** 6.9 (4.1, 11.4) 26 (2, 47) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.3, 0.1)
Warrick County Urban *** 6.1 (4.0, 9.1) 37 (4, 47) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.5)
Wayne County Rural *** 6.4 (4.2, 9.3) 33 (4, 47) 6 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Wells County Urban *** 7.9 (4.5, 13.2) 13 (1, 47) 3
*
*
Benton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daviess County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fayette County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fountain County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fulton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jennings County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
LaGrange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noble County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Orange County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Posey County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ripley County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Scott County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Starke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Steuben County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tipton County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Whitley County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 6:23 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top