Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Colorado N/A Yes 111.6 (110.0, 113.2) N/A 3,839 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.7, -1.3)
United States N/A No 126.4 (126.2, 126.6) N/A 285,526 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Baca County Rural No 179.5 (113.1, 277.5) 1 (1, 48) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 7.2)
Crowley County Rural No 172.0 (104.1, 276.8) 2 (1, 50) 5
*
*
Prowers County Rural No 164.4 (126.2, 211.5) 3 (1, 32) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Huerfano County Rural No 153.5 (109.0, 215.2) 4 (1, 47) 10 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.8)
Washington County Rural No 149.5 (93.8, 229.7) 5 (1, 53) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Morgan County Rural No 146.4 (121.5, 175.0) 6 (1, 32) 27 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Conejos County Rural No 142.5 (98.5, 201.3) 7 (1, 50) 7 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.9)
Pueblo County Urban No 136.6 (127.3, 146.5) 8 (3, 20) 171 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Las Animas County Rural No 136.4 (110.0, 169.4) 9 (1, 42) 20 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.7, 1.3)
Yuma County Rural No 131.2 (93.4, 180.3) 10 (1, 51) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9)
Phillips County Rural No 130.3 (79.8, 205.3) 11 (1, 54) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Delta County Rural No 129.6 (110.6, 151.7) 12 (3, 37) 38 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Fremont County Rural No 127.4 (111.0, 146.0) 13 (4, 35) 49 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Lincoln County Rural No 125.3 (81.0, 191.1) 14 (1, 54) 5 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Otero County Rural No 125.3 (100.6, 155.1) 15 (3, 46) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Custer County Rural No 123.1 (75.9, 198.1) 16 (1, 54) 6
*
*
San Miguel County Rural Yes 121.1 (68.7, 195.9) 17 (1, 54) 4
*
*
El Paso County Urban Yes 120.8 (116.0, 125.8) 18 (11, 29) 490 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Gunnison County Rural Yes 120.6 (88.0, 161.8) 19 (2, 51) 10 stable stable trend -1.5 (-2.9, 0.3)
Adams County 8 Urban Yes 120.3 (114.0, 126.7) 20 (11, 30) 292 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.8, -1.4)
Denver County Urban Yes 118.8 (113.7, 124.0) 21 (11, 30) 430 falling falling trend -1.5 (-4.4, -1.2)
Sedgwick County Rural Yes 118.3 (69.2, 214.7) 22 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Logan County Rural Yes 115.9 (91.3, 146.0) 23 (3, 49) 18 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2)
Mesa County Urban Yes 115.5 (106.9, 124.8) 24 (11, 37) 140 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Weld County 8 Urban Yes 115.5 (108.2, 123.1) 25 (12, 35) 194 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.3, -1.1)
Teller County Urban Yes 115.1 (92.6, 142.3) 26 (4, 49) 22 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.1, 0.0)
Rio Grande County Rural Yes 115.0 (83.3, 156.1) 27 (3, 52) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Rio Blanco County Rural Yes 113.5 (69.4, 176.7) 28 (1, 54) 4
*
*
Saguache County Rural Yes 110.6 (70.7, 168.8) 29 (1, 54) 6 falling falling trend -3.3 (-19.3, -0.8)
Jefferson County 8 Urban Yes 109.8 (105.1, 114.6) 30 (19, 38) 437 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.3)
Arapahoe County Urban Yes 109.2 (104.5, 114.1) 31 (21, 38) 414 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.9, -1.3)
Elbert County Urban Yes 105.9 (83.6, 132.8) 32 (6, 51) 18 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.1)
Moffat County Rural Yes 105.7 (75.0, 145.3) 33 (3, 53) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Boulder County 8 Urban Yes 104.5 (98.1, 111.1) 34 (23, 44) 212 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
Clear Creek County Urban Yes 104.2 (71.7, 149.9) 35 (3, 54) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.2)
Montezuma County Rural Yes 103.8 (84.6, 126.8) 36 (10, 51) 23 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Bent County Rural Yes 101.1 (56.2, 174.3) 37 (1, 54) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.5, 0.9)
Larimer County Urban Yes 100.6 (94.7, 106.7) 38 (27, 46) 232 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Garfield County Rural Yes 100.1 (85.0, 117.3) 39 (14, 50) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Chaffee County Rural Yes 99.7 (78.8, 126.2) 40 (10, 52) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Park County Urban Yes 99.0 (72.5, 133.4) 41 (7, 54) 12 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.6, 0.3)
Douglas County Urban Yes 97.8 (91.5, 104.4) 42 (28, 48) 190 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.1)
Montrose County Rural Yes 96.7 (82.3, 113.4) 43 (18, 51) 37 falling falling trend -5.8 (-14.9, -1.4)
Ouray County Rural Yes 96.5 (56.0, 164.2) 44 (2, 54) 4
*
*
Broomfield County 8 Urban Yes 94.8 (82.5, 108.4) 45 (24, 51) 44 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.2, -2.7)
Kit Carson County Rural Yes 92.2 (57.7, 142.3) 46 (4, 54) 5
*
*
Routt County Rural Yes 91.1 (68.7, 118.6) 47 (12, 54) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -0.8)
Alamosa County Rural Yes 88.3 (63.8, 119.7) 48 (11, 54) 9 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
La Plata County Rural Yes 87.9 (74.7, 103.0) 49 (28, 53) 34 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Grand County Rural Yes 83.1 (56.3, 118.9) 50 (12, 54) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.5)
Archuleta County Rural Yes 79.2 (56.7, 110.0) 51 (19, 54) 10
*
*
Summit County Rural Yes 66.5 (46.2, 92.3) 52 (32, 54) 9
*
*
Eagle County Rural Yes 65.8 (51.2, 83.0) 53 (43, 54) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.0)
Pitkin County Rural Yes 59.9 (41.6, 84.9) 54 (42, 54) 7
*
*
Cheyenne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Costilla County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dolores County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilpin County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hinsdale County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kiowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lake County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mineral County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
San Juan County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.


Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top