Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Oregon by County

All Cancer Sites, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages 65+

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 122.7?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Oregon N/A No 882.9 (873.0, 892.8) N/A 6,348 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
United States N/A No 844.0 (842.9, 845.1) N/A 441,232 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.5)
Klamath County Rural No 1,086.1 (1,007.4, 1,169.2) 1 (1, 13) 147 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)
Linn County Urban No 1,057.8 (998.2, 1,120.1) 2 (1, 12) 240 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Curry County Rural No 1,044.3 (942.9, 1,153.6) 3 (1, 20) 80 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Josephine County Urban No 1,040.8 (981.6, 1,102.7) 4 (1, 14) 233 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Douglas County Rural No 1,019.3 (966.5, 1,074.2) 5 (1, 16) 282 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Columbia County Urban No 1,015.0 (924.9, 1,111.5) 6 (1, 22) 97 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Tillamook County Rural No 1,005.2 (898.0, 1,121.6) 7 (1, 26) 67 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Baker County Rural No 994.9 (862.3, 1,142.0) 8 (1, 30) 41 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Coos County Rural No 985.4 (918.0, 1,056.5) 9 (2, 22) 162 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Lincoln County Rural No 962.3 (886.8, 1,042.4) 10 (2, 26) 129 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.4)
Clatsop County Rural No 954.8 (862.0, 1,054.7) 11 (2, 28) 82 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Morrow County Rural No 952.1 (757.8, 1,180.5) 12 (1, 34) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.5)
Harney County Rural No 945.0 (756.9, 1,165.7) 13 (1, 35) 18 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Jefferson County Urban No 934.5 (804.7, 1,079.0) 14 (1, 33) 39 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.5, 0.6)
Wasco County Rural No 930.3 (816.6, 1,055.5) 15 (1, 32) 49 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Union County Rural No 926.5 (812.6, 1,051.8) 16 (1, 32) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Lake County Rural No 921.0 (738.8, 1,134.4) 17 (1, 35) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Grant County Rural No 917.7 (747.0, 1,115.7) 18 (1, 35) 20 rising rising trend 6.4 (1.3, 18.4)
Marion County Urban No 915.8 (879.1, 953.6) 19 (10, 25) 478 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.9, -0.8)
Malheur County Rural No 906.9 (793.3, 1,032.1) 20 (2, 33) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Umatilla County Rural No 905.6 (830.7, 985.3) 21 (6, 30) 110 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Lane County Urban No 900.9 (869.7, 932.9) 22 (12, 27) 647 falling falling trend -1.3 (-3.1, -1.0)
Jackson County Urban No 888.4 (850.5, 927.6) 23 (12, 28) 420 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.8)
Wallowa County Rural No 866.6 (691.7, 1,072.0) 24 (1, 35) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Multnomah County Urban No 862.2 (836.5, 888.4) 25 (18, 29) 895 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.6)
Yamhill County Urban No 852.9 (793.7, 915.4) 26 (14, 32) 157 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.4, -0.9)
Wheeler County Rural No 852.0 (526.8, 1,301.9) 27 (1, 35) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.9)
Polk County Urban No 846.1 (782.1, 914.0) 28 (13, 33) 131 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.1)
Crook County Urban No 833.8 (729.4, 948.9) 29 (10, 35) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.3)
Clackamas County Urban No 820.6 (791.3, 850.6) 30 (22, 32) 610 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.4)
Hood River County Rural No 785.5 (663.0, 924.0) 31 (10, 35) 30 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Washington County Urban No 763.8 (736.3, 792.1) 32 (28, 35) 596 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.1)
Benton County Urban No 761.9 (699.7, 828.2) 33 (24, 35) 114 falling falling trend -2.9 (-9.2, -1.0)
Deschutes County Urban No 738.3 (698.3, 780.0) 34 (29, 35) 266 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -1.2)
Gilliam County Rural No 575.5 (332.8, 928.4) 35 (8, 35) 3
*
*
Sherman County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/20/2024 8:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top