Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 442.9 (442.2, 443.7) 1,519,335 § 2011 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
California 3 412.5 (410.4, 414.5) 156,216 2011 * *
New York 2,10 484.2 (481.2, 487.1) 106,359 2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1)
Florida 2,10 418.0 (415.4, 420.6) 103,912 2011 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.3)
Texas 2,10 398.5 (396.0, 401.1) 95,814 2011 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.3)
Pennsylvania 2,10 489.9 (486.4, 493.5) 76,781 2011 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Illinois 2,10 466.8 (463.2, 470.5) 64,413 2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Ohio 2,10 443.5 (439.8, 447.1) 59,720 2011 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.9, -0.3)
Michigan 4,10 464.7 # (460.7, 468.8) 53,297 2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.2)
North Carolina 2,10 454.5 (450.4, 458.6) 48,429 2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.2)
New Jersey 3,8 472.2 (467.9, 476.5) 47,234 2011 falling falling trend -1 (-1.4, -0.5)
Georgia 7 452.4 (448.1, 456.8) 43,505 2011 * *
Massachusetts 2,10 474.0 (469.1, 479.0) 36,069 2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.5, -0.3)
Virginia 2,10 414.4 (410.1, 418.8) 36,033 2011 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.3)
Washington 4,10 458.1 (453.1, 463.1) 33,599 2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Tennessee 2,10 459.6 (454.6, 464.6) 33,420 2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Indiana 2,10 438.4 (433.4, 443.3) 31,307 2011 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.2)
Missouri 2,10 437.3 (432.3, 442.3) 30,176 2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5)
Wisconsin 2,10 451.6 (446.4, 456.9) 29,582 2011 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -0.9)
Minnesota 2,10 480.4 (474.8, 486.2) 28,213 2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Maryland 2,10 432.3 (427.1, 437.6) 27,426 2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
Arizona 2,10 376.4 (371.9, 381.0) 27,039 2011 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.4, -0.1)
Alabama 2,10 445.6 (440.0, 451.3) 24,521 2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.2, 0.5)
Kentucky 3 495.7 (489.4, 502.1) 24,428 2011 * *
Louisiana 3 479.8 (473.6, 486.1) 23,454 2011 * *
South Carolina 2,10 429.1 (423.4, 434.8) 22,948 2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Colorado 2,10 410.4 (404.8, 416.1) 21,149 2011 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.1, -1.4)
Oregon 2,10 446.6 (440.3, 453.0) 20,117 2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.7)
Connecticut 3,8 475.9 (469.2, 482.7) 20,064 2011 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.3)
Oklahoma 2,10 435.3 (428.9, 441.8) 18,215 2011 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.9)
Iowa 3,8 465.5 (458.4, 472.8) 16,836 2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.0)
Mississippi 2,10 459.4 (451.9, 466.9) 14,873 2011 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Arkansas 2,10 427.4 (420.4, 434.6) 14,568 2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Kansas 2,10 460.5 (452.9, 468.2) 14,389 2011 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.4)
West Virginia 2,10 470.6 (461.7, 479.7) 11,191 2011 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.9, -0.2)
Utah 3,8 409.3 (400.9, 417.8) 9,412 2011 stable stable trend 0 (-0.1, 0.2)
Nebraska 2,10 436.4 (427.2, 445.8) 8,852 2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.4, -0.4)
New Mexico 3,8 367.9 (360.0, 375.9) 8,546 2011 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.3)
Maine 2,10 469.4 (458.9, 480.0) 8,081 2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
New Hampshire 2,10 486.4 (475.2, 497.8) 7,589 2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.2)
Idaho 2,10 440.3 (430.1, 450.7) 7,318 2011 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8)
Hawaii 3,8 411.4 (401.3, 421.7) 6,636 2011 stable stable trend 0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Rhode Island 2,10 459.0 (446.8, 471.4) 5,675 2011 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.3, -1.1)
Montana 2,10 452.3 (440.1, 464.8) 5,527 2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Delaware 2,10 489.1 (475.7, 502.8) 5,221 2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
South Dakota 2,10 448.7 (435.0, 462.7) 4,251 2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.5, 1.9)
North Dakota 2,10 445.1 (430.1, 460.4) 3,517 2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Vermont 2,10 449.7 (434.4, 465.4) 3,474 2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.2)
District of Columbia 2,10 504.6 (486.5, 523.2) 3,062 2011 stable stable trend -0 (-4.5, 4.7)
Wyoming 2,10 429.2 (412.6, 446.4) 2,643 2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Alaska 2 416.4 (399.1, 434.2) 2,596 2011 * *
Nevada 2
¶¶
¶¶
2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/25/2014 5:12 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics 2013.
3 Source: SEER November 2013 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top