Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Name
State
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 34.9 (34.6, 35.1) 65,686 § 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-4.6, -3.4)
Alabama 2,10 33.9 (31.8, 36.0) 1,032 2011 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.0, -1.1)
Alaska 2 33.8 (27.3, 41.3) 106 2011 * *
Arizona 2,10 29.3 (27.6, 31.1) 1,120 2011 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 0.9)
Arkansas 2,10 37.7 (34.9, 40.7) 697 2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.5, 4.8)
California 3 33.1 (32.3, 33.9) 6,818 2011 * *
Colorado 2,10 31.2 (29.1, 33.5) 835 2011 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.2, -1.0)
Connecticut 3,8 33.9 (31.5, 36.4) 808 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-4.8, -3.3)
Delaware 2,10 32.3 (27.8, 37.4) 191 2011 falling falling trend -5.6 (-10.3, -0.7)
District of Columbia 2,10 38.6 (32.2, 46.0) 132 2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-12.4, 5.9)
Florida 2,10 32.8 (31.8, 33.8) 4,545 2011 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.4, -1.9)
Georgia 7 35.8 (34.2, 37.5) 1,874 2011 * *
Hawaii 3,8 35.7 (31.7, 40.0) 310 2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Idaho 2,10 35.5 (31.5, 39.8) 305 2011 stable stable trend -2.7 (-10.9, 6.3)
Illinois 2,10 39.7 (38.3, 41.1) 3,076 2011 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.1, -1.4)
Indiana 2,10 39.5 (37.5, 41.5) 1,549 2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.2, -0.2)
Iowa 3,8 37.9 (35.3, 40.8) 791 2011 falling falling trend -3 (-3.5, -2.4)
Kansas 2,10 34.6 (31.8, 37.6) 593 2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-9.0, 1.6)
Kentucky 3 40.6 (38.2, 43.2) 1,094 2011 * *
Louisiana 3 42.3 (39.9, 44.9) 1,125 2011 * *
Maine 2,10 35.5 (31.7, 39.7) 334 2011 falling falling trend -6.7 (-12.0, -1.0)
Maryland 2,10 33.1 (31.2, 35.1) 1,162 2011 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.8, -1.8)
Massachusetts 2,10 33.7 (31.9, 35.5) 1,449 2011 falling falling trend -4.8 (-6.7, -2.9)
Michigan 4,10 34.0 # (32.6, 35.5) 2,138 2011 falling falling trend -5 (-7.1, -2.8)
Minnesota 2,10 34.3 (32.2, 36.4) 1,104 2011 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.9, -3.0)
Mississippi 2,10 41.1 (38.1, 44.2) 733 2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.9, 1.8)
Missouri 2,10 36.1 (34.2, 38.1) 1,384 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-6.4, -1.5)
Montana 2,10 35.4 (30.7, 40.5) 224 2011 falling falling trend -4.8 (-9.1, -0.2)
Nebraska 2,10 39.7 (36.0, 43.7) 445 2011 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.6, -0.1)
Nevada 2
¶¶
¶¶
2011 * *
New Hampshire 2,10 37.3 (33.2, 41.8) 315 2011 stable stable trend -4.8 (-12.0, 3.0)
New Jersey 3,8 37.7 (36.1, 39.4) 2,149 2011 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.2, -3.2)
New Mexico 3,8 30.0 (27.0, 33.3) 371 2011 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.1)
New York 2,10 36.7 (35.6, 37.8) 4,578 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-4.9, -3.0)
North Carolina 2,10 32.9 (31.4, 34.4) 1,916 2011 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.6, -2.0)
North Dakota 2,10 38.3 (32.5, 44.8) 170 2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.6, 1.2)
Ohio 2,10 34.9 (33.5, 36.2) 2,626 2011 falling falling trend -6 (-8.4, -3.6)
Oklahoma 2,10 36.8 (34.3, 39.4) 837 2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.1)
Oregon 2,10 30.7 (28.5, 33.1) 749 2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-9.1, 0.9)
Pennsylvania 2,10 38.3 (37.0, 39.7) 3,429 2011 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.8, -2.6)
Rhode Island 2,10 33.9 (29.7, 38.6) 253 2011 stable stable trend -6.5 (-13.0, 0.4)
South Carolina 2,10 33.3 (31.2, 35.5) 976 2011 falling falling trend -4.9 (-6.8, -2.9)
South Dakota 2,10 35.6 (30.5, 41.3) 191 2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-12.9, 6.0)
Tennessee 2,10 35.4 (33.5, 37.3) 1,397 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-6.4, -1.5)
Texas 2,10 32.1 (31.1, 33.1) 4,133 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-5.3, -2.7)
Utah 3,8 29.1 (26.1, 32.4) 342 2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.7, -1.1)
Vermont 2,10 33.9 (28.5, 40.2) 144 2011 stable stable trend -5.7 (-11.4, 0.3)
Virginia 2,10 31.8 (30.1, 33.4) 1,488 2011 falling falling trend -4 (-5.9, -2.0)
Washington 4,10 32.9 (31.1, 34.8) 1,285 2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-8.5, 4.4)
West Virginia 2,10 39.5 (36.1, 43.2) 515 2011 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.9, -0.1)
Wisconsin 2,10 33.8 (31.9, 35.8) 1,219 2011 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.4, -1.2)
Wyoming 2,10 30.6 (24.7, 37.5) 97 2011 stable stable trend -2 (-12.7, 10.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/21/2014 11:58 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics 2013.
3 Source: SEER November 2013 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top