Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Name
State
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 60.4 (60.1, 60.7) 212,493 § 2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Alabama 2,10 69.6 (67.4, 71.8) 3,991 2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.3, -2.3)
Alaska 2 57.2 (50.7, 64.2) 335 2012 * *
Arizona 2,10 49.4 (47.8, 51.1) 3,749 2012 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.3, 1.3)
Arkansas 2,10 75.1 (72.2, 78.0) 2,666 2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.0, 2.2)
California 3 44.2 (43.5, 44.9) 16,597 2012 * *
Colorado 2,10 44.9 (43.1, 46.9) 2,297 2012 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.2, -1.7)
Connecticut 3,8 61.0 (58.7, 63.5) 2,626 2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Delaware 2,10 67.9 (63.1, 73.1) 754 2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-6.3, 2.9)
District of Columbia 2,10 61.2 (55.1, 67.9) 378 2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.8, 4.0)
Florida 2,10 61.2 (60.2, 62.1) 16,400 2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.1)
Georgia 3 66.7 (65.0, 68.4) 6,513 2012 * *
Hawaii 3,8 44.9 (41.7, 48.3) 762 2012 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.4, -2.0)
Idaho 2,10 51.0 (47.6, 54.5) 873 2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.3)
Illinois 2,10 65.8 (64.4, 67.2) 9,161 2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Indiana 2,10 69.8 (67.8, 71.7) 5,088 2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.4)
Iowa 3,8 61.7 (59.1, 64.3) 2,307 2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
Kansas 2,10 59.0 (56.4, 61.8) 1,910 2012 * *
Kentucky 3 92.4 (89.7, 95.1) 4,712 2012 * *
Louisiana 3 70.1 (67.8, 72.5) 3,525 2012 * *
Maine 2,10 74.6 (70.6, 78.8) 1,358 2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.5)
Maryland 2,10 56.1 (54.3, 58.0) 3,566 2012 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.5, -2.6)
Massachusetts 2,10 64.8 (63.0, 66.7) 5,004 2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.2)
Michigan 4,10 65.1 # (63.6, 66.6) 7,674 2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.1)
Minnesota 2,10 54.7 (52.8, 56.6) 3,272 2012 * *
Mississippi 2,10 74.5 (71.6, 77.6) 2,482 2012 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.0)
Missouri 2,10 75.1 (73.1, 77.2) 5,370 2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.7)
Montana 2,10 53.2 (49.3, 57.5) 683 2012 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.7, 1.1)
Nebraska 2,10 59.1 (55.8, 62.5) 1,232 2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-4.8, 2.9)
Nevada 2
¶¶
¶¶
2012 * *
New Hampshire 2,10 64.0 (60.1, 68.2) 1,013 2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.4, 0.0)
New Jersey 3,8 56.3 (54.8, 57.8) 5,718 2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.2, -1.6)
New Mexico 3,8 40.6 (38.0, 43.2) 968 2012 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.3)
New York 2,10 60.3 (59.2, 61.3) 13,495 2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.8, -1.1)
North Carolina 2,10 67.7 (66.1, 69.3) 7,465 2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
North Dakota 2,10 55.1 (50.1, 60.6) 449 2012 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.2, 6.5)
Ohio 2,10 66.8 (65.4, 68.2) 9,277 2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.3, -1.1)
Oklahoma 2,10 69.3 (66.8, 71.9) 2,987 2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.1, 0.6)
Oregon 2,10 55.9 (53.8, 58.2) 2,600 2012 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.2)
Pennsylvania 2,10 63.9 (62.7, 65.2) 10,418 2012 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Rhode Island 2,10 69.9 (65.3, 74.7) 904 2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.1, 2.9)
South Carolina 2,10 67.0 (64.9, 69.2) 3,778 2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
South Dakota 2,10 54.6 (50.0, 59.5) 539 2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.4, 1.2)
Tennessee 2,10 74.9 (72.9, 76.9) 5,654 2012 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Texas 2,10 55.4 (54.4, 56.3) 13,212 2012 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.2)
Utah 3,8 29.9 (27.6, 32.2) 679 2012 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Vermont 2,10 62.4 (57.0, 68.2) 514 2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.0, 2.4)
Virginia 2,10 60.6 (59.0, 62.3) 5,328 2012 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.1, -1.3)
Washington 4,10 58.7 (57.0, 60.6) 4,324 2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.8)
West Virginia 2,10 77.1 (73.6, 80.6) 1,934 2012 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.9, -0.9)
Wisconsin 2,10 58.9 (57.0, 60.8) 3,966 2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.4)
Wyoming 2,10 48.0 (42.6, 53.9) 306 2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.0, -0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2015 8:39 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics 2013.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top