Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Breast, All Ages
Sorted by Count
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 122.1 (121.6, 122.6) 225,801 § 2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
California 3 121.0 (119.5, 122.5) 25,034 2012 * *
New York 2,10 126.4 (124.4, 128.5) 15,019 2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Florida 2,10 114.1 (112.2, 116.0) 14,869 2012 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Texas 2,10 110.8 (109.0, 112.6) 14,719 2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.8, 1.4)
Pennsylvania 2,10 128.2 (125.7, 130.8) 10,652 2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.1)
Illinois 2,10 126.0 (123.5, 128.7) 9,426 2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.5)
Ohio 2,10 120.2 (117.6, 122.8) 8,632 2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Michigan 4,10 124.4 # (121.5, 127.3) 7,584 2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
North Carolina 2,10 125.2 (122.3, 128.1) 7,321 2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.0, 2.9)
New Jersey 3,8 129.9 (126.9, 133.1) 7,077 2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.4, 0.4)
Georgia 3 122.5 (119.6, 125.6) 6,668 2012 * *
Virginia 2,10 123.7 (120.5, 127.0) 5,885 2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Massachusetts 2,10 136.8 (133.2, 140.6) 5,626 2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.0, 2.7)
Washington 4,10 137.2 (133.5, 141.0) 5,443 2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.1, 3.4)
Tennessee 2,10 120.8 (117.3, 124.3) 4,753 2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Missouri 2,10 124.6 (120.9, 128.4) 4,617 2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.3)
Indiana 2,10 118.6 (115.1, 122.2) 4,541 2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Maryland 2,10 124.9 (121.2, 128.8) 4,393 2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.3)
Wisconsin 2,10 125.4 (121.6, 129.3) 4,309 2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.7, 1.8)
Arizona 2,10 107.2 (103.9, 110.6) 4,107 2012 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Minnesota 2,10 128.0 (124.0, 132.2) 4,013 2012 * *
South Carolina 2,10 126.9 (122.7, 131.2) 3,733 2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Alabama 2,10 119.8 (115.8, 123.9) 3,556 2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Colorado 2,10 122.6 (118.5, 126.8) 3,495 2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.6, 1.2)
Kentucky 3 123.6 (119.3, 128.0) 3,285 2012 * *
Louisiana 3 121.4 (117.2, 125.8) 3,219 2012 * *
Connecticut 3,8 136.4 (131.5, 141.4) 3,110 2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Oregon 2,10 125.3 (120.8, 130.0) 3,024 2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.1, 1.7)
Oklahoma 2,10 115.7 (111.2, 120.3) 2,589 2012 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Iowa 3,8 114.5 (109.6, 119.6) 2,160 2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.5, 0.0)
Kansas 2,10 124.7 (119.3, 130.4) 2,070 2012 * *
Mississippi 2,10 116.8 (111.7, 122.1) 2,044 2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Arkansas 2,10 109.2 (104.3, 114.3) 1,956 2012 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.1)
West Virginia 2,10 115.2 (109.1, 121.6) 1,430 2012 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.7, 5.5)
Utah 3,8 115.8 (109.8, 122.1) 1,413 2012 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
New Mexico 3,8 113.9 (107.9, 120.2) 1,408 2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.3)
Nebraska 2,10 118.2 (111.6, 125.1) 1,275 2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.4, 2.4)
Hawaii 3,8 139.8 (131.6, 148.4) 1,159 2012 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
New Hampshire 2,10 132.8 (124.9, 141.1) 1,122 2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.1, 4.4)
Maine 2,10 120.0 (112.8, 127.6) 1,109 2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.5)
Idaho 2,10 123.4 (115.9, 131.2) 1,079 2012 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.3)
Rhode Island 2,10 138.2 (129.1, 147.9) 913 2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.1, 9.9)
Montana 2,10 114.1 (105.6, 123.1) 724 2012 stable stable trend -1.0 (-6.9, 5.2)
Delaware 2,10 123.7 (114.6, 133.4) 720 2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-4.1, 2.7)
South Dakota 2,10 141.4 (130.4, 152.9) 671 2012 stable stable trend 3.4 (-4.6, 12.0)
Vermont 2,10 129.0 (117.8, 141.1) 529 2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.2)
North Dakota 2,10 123.6 (112.3, 135.7) 480 2012 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.8, 6.1)
District of Columbia 2,10 130.3 (118.0, 143.4) 434 2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-7.4, 7.6)
Alaska 2 121.6 (109.4, 134.8) 404 2012 * *
Wyoming 2,10 107.2 (95.8, 119.6) 345 2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.7, 5.8)
Nevada 2
¶¶
¶¶
2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/04/2015 5:42 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
2 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission as published in United States Cancer Statistics 2013.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
4 State rates include rates from areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.
Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top