Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Ovary, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
State
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.8 (11.8, 11.9) 21,341 § falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Wyoming 6,10 12.8 (11.0, 14.8) 39 rising rising trend 6.2 (2.4, 10.1)
Wisconsin 6,10 12.4 (11.9, 13.0) 420 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.0, -0.3)
West Virginia 6,10 12.9 (11.9, 13.8) 157 stable stable trend -1.2 (-7.4, 5.5)
Washington 5,10 13.1 (12.5, 13.6) 498 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.3)
Virginia 6,10 11.8 (11.4, 12.3) 539 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.2, 0.1)
Vermont 6,10 11.8 (10.3, 13.5) 48 stable stable trend 3.8 (-9.2, 18.6)
Utah 3,8 11.6 (10.8, 12.5) 136 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.6)
Texas 6,10 11.2 (11.0, 11.5) 1,410 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.9)
Tennessee 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 442 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.0, 2.9)
South Dakota 6,10 10.2 (9.0, 11.7) 49 falling falling trend -5.8 (-8.8, -2.7)
South Carolina 6,10 9.9 (9.4, 10.5) 278 stable stable trend -0.1 (-6.5, 6.8)
Rhode Island 6,10 10.1 (9.0, 11.3) 68 stable stable trend 4.3 (-14.3, 27.1)
Pennsylvania 6,10 12.8 (12.5, 13.2) 1,067 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Oregon 6,10 12.6 (12.0, 13.3) 296 stable stable trend -5.1 (-11.8, 2.2)
Oklahoma 6,10 11.7 (11.0, 12.4) 256 stable stable trend 1.0 (-7.0, 9.6)
Ohio 6,10 11.9 (11.5, 12.2) 847 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.1, 2.3)
North Dakota 6,10 10.1 (8.7, 11.7) 40 stable stable trend -6.2 (-15.6, 4.1)
North Carolina 6,10 11.5 (11.1, 11.9) 644 falling falling trend -3.9 (-7.1, -0.6)
New York 6,10 12.8 (12.5, 13.1) 1,518 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.4)
New Mexico 3,8 11.7 (10.8, 12.6) 142 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
New Jersey 3,8 13.0 (12.6, 13.5) 702 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.6)
New Hampshire 6,10 11.9 (10.8, 13.0) 97 stable stable trend -1.4 (-11.7, 10.2)
Nevada 6
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
¶¶
Nebraska 6,10 10.5 (9.6, 11.4) 112 stable stable trend -4.3 (-14.8, 7.7)
Montana 6,10 12.5 (11.3, 13.8) 79 stable stable trend -6.8 (-14.8, 1.8)
Missouri 6,10 10.3 (9.9, 10.8) 378 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.4, 1.9)
Mississippi 6,10 9.6 (9.0, 10.3) 165 stable stable trend -1.5 (-10.7, 8.7)
Minnesota 6,10 11.4 (10.8, 11.9) 348 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.1)
Michigan 5,10 12.5 # (12.1, 12.9) 752 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Massachusetts 6,10 12.3 (11.8, 12.8) 504 stable stable trend -0.6 (-10.6, 10.7)
Maryland 6,10 11.5 (11.0, 12.0) 393 stable stable trend -3.8 (-9.3, 2.0)
Maine 6,10 10.6 (9.7, 11.7) 97 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.3)
Louisiana 3,9 9.6 (9.1, 10.2) 249 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.6, -3.3)
Kentucky 3,9 11.0 (10.4, 11.6) 283 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.9, 1.6)
Kansas 6,10 11.7 (11.0, 12.5) 191 stable stable trend -2.8 (-11.9, 7.2)
Iowa 3,8 12.1 (11.4, 12.8) 231 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.0)
Indiana 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 440 stable stable trend -4.9 (-9.5, 0.0)
Illinois 6,10 12.1 (11.7, 12.4) 888 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.7, -0.3)
Idaho 6,10 11.7 (10.7, 12.8) 100 stable stable trend 0.7 (-5.8, 7.7)
Hawaii 3,8 9.5 (8.6, 10.6) 75 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Georgia 3,9 12.0 (11.6, 12.5) 614 falling falling trend -6.3 (-10.5, -1.8)
Florida 6,10 11.7 (11.5, 12.0) 1,486 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.7, -1.0)
District of Columbia 6,10 10.0 (8.5, 11.7) 34 stable stable trend 13.9 (-11.4, 46.4)
Delaware 6,10 10.7 (9.5, 12.0) 60 stable stable trend 2.6 (-13.0, 20.9)
Connecticut 3,8 12.6 (11.9, 13.3) 284 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.7)
Colorado 6,10 12.1 (11.5, 12.7) 326 falling falling trend -5.1 (-7.6, -2.5)
California 3,9 12.1 (11.9, 12.3) 2,412 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.6)
Arkansas 6,10 10.3 (9.6, 11.0) 181 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.1, 10.7)
Arizona 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 428 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.7)
Alaska 6,10 11.5 (9.7, 13.4) 35 stable stable trend 6.0 (-13.4, 29.9)
Alabama 6,10 12.0 (11.4, 12.6) 353 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.4, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/26/2016 4:58 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
¶¶ Data not available for Nevada.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Return to Top