Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Alabama 6,10 45.3 (44.4, 46.1) 2,435 stable stable trend -4.0 (-7.8, 0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Coffee County 6,10 28.7 (22.8, 35.7) 17 stable stable trend 1.6 (-17.2, 24.5)
Cherokee County 6,10 29.9 (22.4, 39.5) 11
*
*
Chilton County 6,10 32.7 (25.8, 40.8) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-26.7, 38.9)
Clay County 6,10 35.8 (24.4, 51.0) 7
*
*
Pickens County 6,10 37.9 (28.1, 50.3) 10
*
*
Lee County 6,10 38.0 (33.0, 43.5) 44 stable stable trend -1.2 (-16.8, 17.2)
Pike County 6,10 38.4 (29.4, 49.5) 13
*
*
Cullman County 6,10 38.5 (33.2, 44.6) 38 stable stable trend 1.5 (-11.4, 16.3)
Dale County 6,10 38.7 (31.7, 46.8) 22 stable stable trend -9.8 (-24.7, 8.0)
Geneva County 6,10 38.9 (30.2, 49.5) 14
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 39.0 (35.0, 43.3) 75 stable stable trend 0.3 (-13.2, 16.0)
Madison County 6,10 39.3 (36.3, 42.4) 137 stable stable trend -3.8 (-15.4, 9.3)
Walker County 6,10 39.4 (33.5, 46.0) 33 stable stable trend 3.2 (-20.9, 34.6)
Limestone County 6,10 39.5 (33.9, 45.9) 36 stable stable trend -2.7 (-10.4, 5.6)
Escambia County 6,10 40.0 (32.2, 49.3) 18 stable stable trend -5.3 (-30.3, 28.6)
DeKalb County 6,10 40.4 (34.3, 47.3) 32 stable stable trend -6.9 (-27.9, 20.1)
Tallapoosa County 6,10 41.0 (33.6, 49.6) 23 stable stable trend -12.5 (-33.5, 15.1)
St. Clair County 6,10 41.2 (35.4, 47.7) 38 stable stable trend -7.7 (-20.2, 6.7)
Macon County 6,10 41.4 (30.4, 55.3) 10
*
*
Hale County 6,10 41.7 (29.4, 57.5) 8
*
*
Baldwin County 6,10 42.2 (38.4, 46.2) 98 stable stable trend 0.6 (-9.4, 11.7)
Butler County 6,10 42.3 (31.9, 55.2) 11
*
*
Marshall County 6,10 44.0 (38.5, 50.2) 47 stable stable trend 2.6 (-11.7, 19.3)
Coosa County 6,10 44.1 (29.9, 63.3) 7
*
*
Colbert County 6,10 44.3 (37.7, 51.8) 33 stable stable trend -1.3 (-13.9, 13.1)
Morgan County 6,10 44.8 (39.9, 50.2) 61 stable stable trend 5.2 (-10.4, 23.5)
Lauderdale County 6,10 45.0 (39.6, 51.0) 52 stable stable trend -9.2 (-22.3, 6.2)
Franklin County 6,10 45.2 (36.0, 56.1) 17 stable stable trend 0.3 (-8.4, 9.8)
Jefferson County 6,10 45.3 (43.1, 47.6) 330 falling falling trend -6.4 (-11.7, -0.8)
Houston County 6,10 45.4 (40.0, 51.3) 53 stable stable trend -6.5 (-18.1, 6.9)
Blount County 6,10 45.6 (38.5, 53.7) 30 stable stable trend -5.4 (-22.3, 15.2)
Marion County 6,10 46.0 (36.9, 56.9) 19 stable stable trend -1.2 (-17.9, 19.0)
Etowah County 6,10 46.0 (40.9, 51.7) 61 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.2, 7.2)
Crenshaw County 6,10 46.4 (33.0, 63.6) 8
*
*
Tuscaloosa County 6,10 46.9 (42.5, 51.6) 85 falling falling trend -14.6 (-25.5, -2.2)
Choctaw County 6,10 47.0 (34.2, 63.7) 9
*
*
Chambers County 6,10 47.3 (38.7, 57.4) 22 stable stable trend 1.6 (-23.7, 35.3)
Talladega County 6,10 47.8 (41.7, 54.5) 46 stable stable trend -3.4 (-20.1, 16.8)
Calhoun County 6,10 47.9 (42.8, 53.6) 65 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.5, -1.0)
Jackson County 6,10 48.1 (40.8, 56.5) 32 stable stable trend -8.4 (-20.1, 5.0)
Elmore County 6,10 48.2 (41.5, 55.7) 39 stable stable trend -8.2 (-21.0, 6.7)
Bibb County 6,10 49.0 (37.2, 63.4) 12
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 49.1 (45.1, 53.4) 114 stable stable trend -7.1 (-17.3, 4.5)
Cleburne County 6,10 49.6 (36.2, 66.6) 9
*
*
Randolph County 6,10 49.8 (38.9, 63.0) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-13.4, 10.7)
Mobile County 6,10 49.9 (46.9, 52.9) 223 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.8, 0.9)
Autauga County 6,10 50.2 (42.1, 59.5) 28 stable stable trend -4.9 (-13.9, 4.9)
Washington County 6,10 50.3 (37.3, 66.6) 10
*
*
Covington County 6,10 50.6 (42.3, 60.2) 27 stable stable trend -1.1 (-20.2, 22.6)
Winston County 6,10 51.3 (40.4, 64.3) 16 stable stable trend -2.4 (-19.1, 17.7)
Russell County 6,10 51.5 (43.3, 60.8) 29 stable stable trend -9.0 (-30.8, 19.5)
Lawrence County 6,10 51.6 (41.9, 63.1) 20 stable stable trend 13.0 (-13.3, 47.2)
Sumter County 6,10 51.7 (37.2, 70.4) 9
*
*
Henry County 6,10 51.8 (38.9, 67.8) 12
*
*
Fayette County 6,10 52.0 (39.5, 67.5) 12
*
*
Perry County 6,10 53.1 (36.2, 75.5) 7
*
*
Marengo County 6,10 53.8 (41.7, 68.4) 14
*
*
Barbour County 6,10 55.0 (43.9, 68.1) 18 stable stable trend -10.5 (-39.2, 31.5)
Lamar County 6,10 55.0 (41.4, 72.2) 11
*
*
Conecuh County 6,10 55.7 (40.6, 74.9) 10
*
*
Greene County 6,10 57.6 (39.7, 81.6) 7
*
*
Monroe County 6,10 57.8 (45.7, 72.3) 16 stable stable trend 7.1 (-4.7, 20.3)
Dallas County 6,10 65.1 (55.3, 76.2) 33 stable stable trend -7.3 (-21.2, 8.9)
Clarke County 6,10 65.3 (53.1, 79.5) 21 stable stable trend 4.6 (-14.1, 27.3)
Lowndes County 6,10 65.8 (47.2, 89.5) 9
*
*
Wilcox County 6,10 67.7 (49.1, 91.2) 9
*
*
Bullock County 6,10 70.3 (50.8, 95.1) 9
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/31/2016 1:58 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top