Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Arkansas 6,10 43.5 (42.5, 44.5) 1,450 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.7, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Cross County 6,10 71.2 (56.0, 89.5) 15 stable stable trend -4.2 (-16.7, 10.2)
Jackson County 6,10 69.4 (54.5, 87.4) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-27.3, 42.9)
Arkansas County 6,10 65.5 (51.6, 82.3) 16 stable stable trend -8.9 (-20.3, 4.1)
Ashley County 6,10 62.2 (49.5, 77.4) 17 stable stable trend 1.5 (-40.2, 72.1)
Woodruff County 6,10 60.1 (40.7, 86.8) 6
*
*
Mississippi County 6,10 59.2 (49.6, 70.0) 28 stable stable trend -7.7 (-32.6, 26.3)
Dallas County 6,10 57.4 (39.4, 81.7) 7
*
*
Lee County 6,10 56.8 (39.7, 79.2) 7
*
*
Grant County 6,10 55.8 (42.2, 72.6) 12
*
*
Desha County 6,10 54.2 (39.1, 73.5) 9
*
*
Clay County 6,10 52.7 (40.0, 68.7) 12
*
*
Chicot County 6,10 52.1 (37.6, 71.0) 9
*
*
Phillips County 6,10 51.9 (40.2, 66.3) 13
*
*
Monroe County 6,10 51.6 (35.5, 74.0) 7
*
*
Drew County 6,10 50.9 (37.8, 67.1) 11
*
*
Bradley County 6,10 50.1 (35.5, 69.2) 8
*
*
Randolph County 6,10 49.9 (38.0, 64.6) 12
*
*
Stone County 6,10 49.9 (36.6, 67.2) 10
*
*
Searcy County 6,10 49.7 (34.2, 71.5) 7
*
*
St. Francis County 6,10 49.2 (38.5, 62.0) 15 stable stable trend -4.6 (-22.8, 17.8)
Poinsett County 6,10 48.7 (38.0, 61.8) 14
*
*
Little River County 6,10 48.4 (34.1, 67.0) 8
*
*
Howard County 6,10 48.3 (34.2, 66.5) 8
*
*
Crittenden County 6,10 48.3 (39.8, 58.1) 23 stable stable trend -13.0 (-32.4, 11.9)
Union County 6,10 47.9 (39.6, 57.4) 25 stable stable trend -8.0 (-32.5, 25.4)
Lawrence County 6,10 47.5 (35.8, 62.1) 11
*
*
Hot Spring County 6,10 47.3 (38.3, 58.0) 20 stable stable trend -10.4 (-29.8, 14.3)
Sevier County 6,10 47.3 (33.9, 64.3) 8
*
*
Greene County 6,10 47.2 (38.7, 57.0) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-23.1, 26.2)
Boone County 6,10 46.9 (38.6, 56.6) 23 stable stable trend -7.9 (-18.6, 4.1)
Izard County 6,10 46.5 (34.3, 62.5) 10
*
*
White County 6,10 46.1 (39.8, 53.1) 39 stable stable trend 8.4 (-2.7, 20.7)
Lafayette County 6,10 46.1 (29.6, 69.7) 5
*
*
Sharp County 6,10 46.1 (35.2, 59.9) 13
*
*
Miller County 6,10 46.1 (37.8, 55.7) 22 stable stable trend 3.2 (-9.0, 17.0)
Lincoln County 6,10 45.9 (31.9, 64.2) 7
*
*
Crawford County 6,10 45.6 (38.4, 53.8) 29 stable stable trend 2.4 (-3.3, 8.5)
Yell County 6,10 45.1 (34.5, 58.1) 12
*
*
Cleburne County 6,10 44.9 (35.8, 56.0) 19 falling falling trend -13.8 (-20.0, -7.1)
Pope County 6,10 44.3 (37.3, 52.3) 29 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.5, -1.1)
Columbia County 6,10 44.1 (33.7, 56.8) 13
*
*
Polk County 6,10 44.0 (33.7, 56.9) 13
*
*
Sebastian County 6,10 43.6 (38.7, 48.9) 59 stable stable trend 1.1 (-8.2, 11.3)
Newton County 6,10 43.2 (26.6, 67.2) 5
*
*
Cleveland County 6,10 43.1 (27.3, 65.3) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 42.6 (36.7, 49.3) 38 stable stable trend -8.1 (-30.4, 21.4)
Lonoke County 6,10 42.6 (35.7, 50.5) 28 stable stable trend 0.2 (-10.6, 12.4)
Scott County 6,10 42.2 (28.1, 61.3) 6
*
*
Conway County 6,10 42.1 (31.8, 55.0) 12
*
*
Ouachita County 6,10 42.0 (32.7, 53.2) 15 stable stable trend 1.3 (-17.9, 25.1)
Hempstead County 6,10 41.8 (31.6, 54.4) 12
*
*
Baxter County 6,10 41.7 (35.0, 49.7) 31 stable stable trend -0.8 (-13.0, 13.1)
Logan County 6,10 41.7 (31.8, 54.1) 12
*
*
Pulaski County 6,10 41.4 (38.6, 44.4) 165 falling falling trend -6.9 (-10.2, -3.6)
Madison County 6,10 41.1 (28.9, 57.0) 8
*
*
Independence County 6,10 40.9 (32.8, 50.4) 18 stable stable trend -1.3 (-21.0, 23.2)
Faulkner County 6,10 40.6 (35.1, 46.8) 40 stable stable trend -5.6 (-11.7, 1.1)
Johnson County 6,10 40.6 (30.8, 52.5) 12
*
*
Benton County 6,10 40.0 (36.3, 44.0) 88 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.3, 9.5)
Van Buren County 6,10 39.9 (28.8, 54.4) 10
*
*
Carroll County 6,10 39.0 (30.3, 49.6) 15 stable stable trend -2.5 (-19.9, 18.7)
Craighead County 6,10 38.8 (33.3, 44.9) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-10.8, 11.5)
Fulton County 6,10 38.5 (26.2, 55.2) 7
*
*
Montgomery County 6,10 38.3 (25.7, 56.5) 6
*
*
Washington County 6,10 38.0 (34.0, 42.4) 66 stable stable trend -5.1 (-14.7, 5.5)
Garland County 6,10 36.8 (32.3, 41.8) 53 stable stable trend -3.2 (-12.5, 7.1)
Saline County 6,10 36.5 (31.9, 41.7) 46 stable stable trend 2.1 (-2.3, 6.6)
Prairie County 6,10 36.0 (21.1, 57.8) 4
*
*
Perry County 6,10 35.8 (23.0, 54.0) 5
*
*
Nevada County 6,10 33.1 (19.6, 52.7) 4
*
*
Pike County 6,10 32.8 (21.2, 49.2) 5
*
*
Clark County 6,10 31.9 (23.1, 43.2) 9
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 29.8 (20.8, 41.8) 7
*
*
Marion County 6,10 29.2 (20.4, 41.4) 8
*
*
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/25/2016 12:53 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top