Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
California 3 424.9 (424.0, 425.9) 156,988 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 453.8 (453.5, 454.1) 1,526,274 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Los Angeles County 7,9 405.5 (403.6, 407.3) 38,150 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
San Diego County 7,9 434.9 (431.6, 438.3) 13,294 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Orange County 7,9 418.6 (415.3, 421.9) 12,694 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.0, -1.4)
Riverside County 7,9 414.5 (410.7, 418.4) 8,857 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Santa Clara County 7,9 420.0 (415.7, 424.4) 7,334 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
San Bernardino County 7,9 423.1 (418.6, 427.6) 7,241 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.3)
Sacramento County 7,9 452.0 (447.0, 457.1) 6,346 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.4)
Alameda County 7,8 413.4 (408.8, 418.1) 6,282 2008-2012 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.4)
Contra Costa County 7,8 456.3 (450.6, 462.0) 5,182 2008-2012 falling falling trend -0.2 (-0.3, -0.1)
San Francisco County 7,8 428.9 (422.8, 435.0) 3,948 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
San Mateo County 7,8 447.0 (440.4, 453.7) 3,648 2008-2012 falling falling trend -0.3 (-0.6, -0.1)
Ventura County 7,9 432.7 (426.4, 439.2) 3,629 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.3)
Fresno County 7,9 412.6 (406.3, 419.0) 3,367 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Kern County 7,9 419.5 (412.6, 426.6) 2,899 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.5)
San Joaquin County 7,9 432.1 (424.7, 439.5) 2,718 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Sonoma County 7,9 463.4 (455.3, 471.6) 2,647 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.7)
Stanislaus County 7,9 433.4 (425.0, 441.9) 2,075 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.0, 0.2)
Solano County 7,9 472.3 (462.9, 481.9) 2,017 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.5, -0.1)
Placer County 7,9 460.5 (451.3, 469.9) 1,948 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.1)
Santa Barbara County 7,9 433.0 (424.3, 441.9) 1,912 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.3 (-5.9, -2.6)
Marin County 7,8 475.0 (464.4, 485.8) 1,625 2008-2012 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.8, -0.1)
Monterey County 7,9 413.6 (404.4, 422.9) 1,601 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.2, 3.6)
San Luis Obispo County 7,9 443.7 (433.3, 454.4) 1,459 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.0, 0.3)
Tulare County 7,9 391.5 (382.4, 400.8) 1,436 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-6.4, 2.4)
Butte County 7,9 489.2 (477.0, 501.6) 1,296 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Santa Cruz County 7,9 450.4 (438.7, 462.3) 1,225 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.3, 2.8)
Shasta County 7,9 478.8 (465.9, 492.0) 1,108 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-7.0, 3.4)
El Dorado County 7,9 458.6 (445.8, 471.8) 1,038 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.7, 2.6)
Merced County 7,9 415.9 (403.5, 428.6) 877 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-6.2, 3.8)
Napa County 7,9 488.9 (473.7, 504.5) 815 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.0, 0.2)
Yolo County 7,9 428.2 (414.4, 442.3) 760 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.1, 1.0)
Humboldt County 7,9 459.5 (443.8, 475.5) 696 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.3, 3.5)
Nevada County 7,9 423.9 (408.4, 439.9) 628 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-9.0, 2.4)
Madera County 7,9 420.3 (405.3, 435.6) 611 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.3, -2.0)
Imperial County 7,9 387.9 (374.1, 402.0) 606 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-7.8, 4.4)
Mendocino County 7,9 452.2 (434.2, 470.9) 513 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-8.9, 1.0)
Kings County 7,9 409.3 (392.6, 426.5) 479 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.7 (-4.0, 5.6)
Lake County 7,9 460.1 (439.8, 481.2) 416 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.1, 0.6)
Tuolumne County 7,9 490.8 (468.9, 513.7) 412 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.3 (-8.0, -0.4)
Sutter County 7,9 395.8 (378.2, 414.0) 386 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.1)
Tehama County 7,9 473.2 (451.5, 495.7) 372 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Calaveras County 7,9 413.9 (391.8, 437.1) 298 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-5.3, 5.7)
Yuba County 7,9 444.6 (421.5, 468.5) 291 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-10.1, 4.6)
Siskiyou County 7,9 430.4 (407.3, 454.6) 290 2008-2012 falling falling trend -5.5 (-8.0, -2.8)
Amador County 7,9 469.8 (444.3, 496.6) 279 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-11.4, 5.1)
San Benito County 7,9 433.0 (406.8, 460.3) 216 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.8, 6.1)
Del Norte County 7,9 431.6 (399.9, 465.2) 142 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.3 (-21.1, 11.2)
Glenn County 7,9 443.4 (410.2, 478.6) 135 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-13.0, 12.4)
Plumas County 7,9 420.3 (386.7, 456.5) 134 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.5 (-9.7, 5.3)
Lassen County 7,9 365.7 (336.4, 397.0) 123 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.7, -0.7)
Mariposa County 7,9 396.8 (363.6, 432.7) 116 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-8.5, 7.5)
Inyo County 7,9 408.4 (373.9, 445.6) 111 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.0, 0.4)
Trinity County 7,9 455.5 (413.5, 501.2) 98 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.5 (-12.5, 2.1)
Colusa County 7,9 400.2 (362.2, 441.1) 84 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-21.4, 28.3)
Modoc County 7,9 408.6 (360.4, 462.1) 57 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-16.5, 20.5)
Mono County 7,9 320.8 (277.1, 369.3) 45 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.0 (-20.1, 32.9)
Sierra County 7,9 312.8 (244.4, 398.4) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.3 (-14.1, 26.6)
Alpine County 7,9 499.5 (321.7, 743.1) 6 2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/30/2015 11:03 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top