Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
California 3 40.0 (39.7, 40.3) 14,693 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Los Angeles County 7,9 41.3 (40.7, 41.9) 3,857 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.8 (-5.9, -3.8)
San Diego County 7,9 38.2 (37.2, 39.2) 1,162 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.6, -0.4)
Orange County 7,9 37.6 (36.6, 38.6) 1,139 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-9.0, 1.0)
Riverside County 7,9 40.9 (39.7, 42.1) 868 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.4 (-7.1, 0.4)
San Bernardino County 7,9 44.2 (42.7, 45.6) 731 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-7.4, -0.1)
Santa Clara County 7,9 38.7 (37.4, 40.1) 673 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.9 (-7.0, -2.8)
Sacramento County 7,9 43.3 (41.8, 44.9) 603 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.5, -2.0)
Alameda County 7,8 39.4 (38.0, 40.9) 591 2008-2012 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.8, -0.8)
Contra Costa County 7,8 43.9 (42.2, 45.7) 501 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.7)
San Francisco County 7,8 42.9 (41.0, 44.8) 397 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
San Mateo County 7,8 40.0 (38.1, 42.1) 327 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.0 (-15.9, -1.6)
Ventura County 7,9 38.4 (36.5, 40.4) 320 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.5 (-10.7, -4.1)
Fresno County 7,9 37.0 (35.1, 39.0) 300 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-9.1, 4.8)
Kern County 7,9 38.5 (36.3, 40.6) 259 2008-2012 falling falling trend -6.9 (-9.7, -4.1)
San Joaquin County 7,9 39.7 (37.4, 42.0) 247 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-14.0, 5.6)
Sonoma County 7,9 41.6 (39.2, 44.1) 240 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.6, -1.5)
Stanislaus County 7,9 45.4 (42.7, 48.2) 216 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.8 (-9.7, 0.2)
Solano County 7,9 42.4 (39.7, 45.4) 180 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.7 (-15.4, -3.7)
Santa Barbara County 7,9 36.0 (33.5, 38.6) 161 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.0, 5.0)
Placer County 7,9 37.3 (34.7, 40.0) 158 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.6 (-15.7, 3.4)
Tulare County 7,9 37.0 (34.2, 40.0) 134 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.5 (-22.1, 14.7)
Marin County 7,8 37.7 (34.8, 40.8) 131 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
San Luis Obispo County 7,9 35.9 (33.0, 39.0) 118 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-11.7, 9.2)
Monterey County 7,9 29.3 (26.9, 31.9) 114 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-6.0, 4.7)
Butte County 7,9 41.3 (37.8, 45.0) 112 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.2 (-2.9, 7.6)
Santa Cruz County 7,9 35.3 (32.1, 38.8) 96 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.7 (-20.7, 5.1)
El Dorado County 7,9 40.2 (36.5, 44.3) 89 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.0 (-10.7, -3.1)
Shasta County 7,9 38.2 (34.6, 42.0) 88 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.0 (-6.9, 16.3)
Merced County 7,9 39.3 (35.5, 43.4) 81 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.0 (-11.2, 12.6)
Napa County 7,9 42.8 (38.4, 47.7) 71 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.5 (-17.0, -1.4)
Humboldt County 7,9 46.9 (41.9, 52.3) 69 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.1 (-20.1, 1.0)
Yolo County 7,9 38.2 (34.1, 42.7) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-16.1, 4.5)
Imperial County 7,9 35.7 (31.6, 40.1) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-12.1, 5.9)
Madera County 7,9 38.7 (34.2, 43.6) 55 2008-2012 falling falling trend -13.4 (-20.5, -5.6)
Nevada County 7,9 32.4 (28.1, 37.3) 45 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.5 (-10.7, 19.8)
Lake County 7,9 49.4 (42.8, 56.7) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.4 (-21.3, 9.0)
Mendocino County 7,9 38.5 (33.4, 44.2) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-16.9, 16.4)
Kings County 7,9 37.7 (32.7, 43.2) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-14.7, 8.9)
Tuolumne County 7,9 40.8 (34.6, 47.8) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-16.6, 11.2)
Tehama County 7,9 42.7 (36.4, 49.8) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-21.4, 14.2)
Sutter County 7,9 33.5 (28.5, 39.1) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-15.5, 8.3)
Yuba County 7,9 41.0 (34.2, 48.7) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.6 (-12.3, 17.6)
Calaveras County 7,9 37.7 (31.0, 45.6) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-17.6, 18.3)
Amador County 7,9 40.1 (33.1, 48.5) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.2 (-22.8, 4.6)
Siskiyou County 7,9 34.6 (28.3, 42.1) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-16.7, 19.4)
San Benito County 7,9 36.6 (29.3, 45.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-25.9, 22.9)
Glenn County 7,9 38.4 (29.2, 49.7) 12 2008-2012 * *
Plumas County 7,9 37.0 (27.7, 49.1) 12 2008-2012 * *
Lassen County 7,9 34.4 (25.8, 45.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Inyo County 7,9 41.7 (31.0, 55.2) 11 2008-2012 * *
Mariposa County 7,9 35.6 (26.2, 48.1) 10 2008-2012 * *
Del Norte County 7,9 31.3 (23.2, 41.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Colusa County 7,9 40.1 (28.6, 54.6) 8 2008-2012 * *
Trinity County 7,9 30.6 (21.2, 44.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Modoc County 7,9 36.9 (24.1, 55.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Alpine County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mono County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sierra County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2015 9:18 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top