Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
California 3 48.0 (47.6, 48.3) 17,132 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 63.7 (63.6, 63.8) 213,812 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Mono County 7,9 28.1 (15.6, 46.4) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Santa Cruz County 7,9 39.6 (36.1, 43.4) 101 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-20.1, 23.4)
San Benito County 7,9 40.4 (32.3, 49.9) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.6 (-22.6, 30.9)
Santa Clara County 7,9 41.3 (39.9, 42.7) 685 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.3, 3.9)
Los Angeles County 7,9 41.6 (41.0, 42.2) 3,759 2008-2012 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.8, -2.9)
Yolo County 7,9 42.2 (37.9, 46.9) 72 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.5 (-15.5, -1.0)
Ventura County 7,9 42.7 (40.6, 44.8) 342 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.3, -2.7)
Santa Barbara County 7,9 43.0 (40.2, 45.8) 190 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-10.6, 0.2)
Plumas County 7,9 43.0 (33.4, 55.1) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-27.7, 34.5)
Monterey County 7,9 43.2 (40.3, 46.4) 162 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-10.8, 9.6)
Marin County 7,8 44.1 (40.9, 47.5) 149 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Inyo County 7,9 45.0 (34.7, 58.1) 13 2008-2012
*
*
San Mateo County 7,8 46.0 (43.9, 48.2) 373 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.4)
Orange County 7,9 46.2 (45.0, 47.3) 1,346 2008-2012 falling falling trend -5.5 (-9.6, -1.3)
Imperial County 7,9 46.7 (41.9, 51.9) 71 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.9, 3.4)
Alameda County 7,8 47.0 (45.4, 48.6) 680 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.8)
Nevada County 7,9 48.0 (43.1, 53.3) 74 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.8 (-21.0, 5.4)
San Luis Obispo County 7,9 48.3 (45.0, 51.8) 162 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-16.6, 11.3)
Riverside County 7,9 48.6 (47.2, 49.9) 1,025 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.9, -0.1)
Tulare County 7,9 49.3 (46.0, 52.7) 175 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.1 (-20.1, 10.2)
Placer County 7,9 49.3 (46.3, 52.4) 212 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-16.3, 7.4)
San Francisco County 7,8 49.6 (47.6, 51.7) 458 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.5, -1.9)
San Diego County 7,9 49.8 (48.6, 51.0) 1,472 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.1, 0.4)
Contra Costa County 7,8 50.0 (48.1, 52.0) 545 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Kings County 7,9 50.7 (44.7, 57.1) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-17.7, 9.6)
El Dorado County 7,9 50.8 (46.6, 55.3) 114 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-11.5, 1.1)
San Bernardino County 7,9 51.0 (49.4, 52.7) 805 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.1 (-11.2, 1.5)
Madera County 7,9 51.6 (46.4, 57.2) 74 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.3 (-20.8, 11.0)
Sonoma County 7,9 51.6 (48.9, 54.4) 290 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-9.7, 2.1)
Fresno County 7,9 52.7 (50.4, 55.1) 414 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-6.3, 2.4)
Modoc County 7,9 53.0 (37.3, 74.3) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Calaveras County 7,9 54.5 (47.1, 63.0) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.8 (-18.5, 27.2)
Humboldt County 7,9 56.1 (50.7, 61.8) 84 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.3 (-10.2, 6.3)
Mendocino County 7,9 56.9 (50.8, 63.7) 66 2008-2012 falling falling trend -10.3 (-18.7, -0.9)
Napa County 7,9 57.7 (52.6, 63.2) 97 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.8 (-15.2, -4.1)
Sutter County 7,9 58.0 (51.4, 65.2) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-12.1, 5.6)
Kern County 7,9 58.0 (55.4, 60.7) 377 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-7.8, 0.0)
Lassen County 7,9 58.1 (46.3, 72.0) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-32.8, 30.4)
San Joaquin County 7,9 58.4 (55.7, 61.3) 353 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.9 (-11.4, 6.4)
Sacramento County 7,9 58.6 (56.7, 60.5) 794 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.4, 0.6)
Amador County 7,9 58.9 (50.6, 68.5) 37 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-10.9, 9.6)
Stanislaus County 7,9 59.2 (56.1, 62.4) 275 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-13.0, 4.4)
Merced County 7,9 59.9 (55.2, 64.9) 121 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.8, 1.3)
Solano County 7,9 60.3 (56.9, 63.8) 245 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.2, 0.7)
Colusa County 7,9 61.0 (46.6, 78.2) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Mariposa County 7,9 61.9 (49.0, 77.7) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-10.5, 10.0)
Tuolumne County 7,9 62.6 (55.3, 70.8) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.3 (-23.7, 3.2)
Siskiyou County 7,9 64.7 (56.3, 74.2) 45 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.4 (-16.0, -0.2)
Shasta County 7,9 66.1 (61.5, 71.0) 160 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.6 (-14.8, 0.1)
Butte County 7,9 66.2 (61.8, 70.7) 179 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-10.1, 2.6)
Glenn County 7,9 68.3 (55.8, 82.9) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.2 (-30.3, 3.1)
Tehama County 7,9 70.3 (62.2, 79.1) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.9 (-21.3, 5.4)
Yuba County 7,9 70.6 (61.4, 80.6) 45 2008-2012 falling falling trend -13.6 (-25.1, -0.3)
Lake County 7,9 71.0 (63.3, 79.4) 66 2008-2012 falling falling trend -3.7 (-6.6, -0.7)
Trinity County 7,9 76.3 (59.9, 96.7) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -15.6 (-34.5, 8.8)
Del Norte County 7,9 84.7 (70.8, 100.5) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-30.2, 37.4)
Alpine County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Sierra County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/04/2015 5:05 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top