Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Cervix, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
California 3 7.8 (7.7, 8.0) 1,467 2007-2011 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 7.8 (7.8, 7.9) 12,530 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Alameda County 7,8 6.4 (5.6, 7.2) 51 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.7)
Alpine County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Amador County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Butte County 7,9 7.4 (5.2, 10.3) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.4 (-55.6, 42.6)
Calaveras County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Colusa County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Contra Costa County 7,8 6.2 (5.3, 7.2) 34 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.1 (-0.2, 14.9)
Del Norte County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
El Dorado County 7,9 6.5 (4.3, 9.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.3 (-38.2, 33.3)
Fresno County 7,9 9.0 (7.7, 10.3) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-17.0, 8.7)
Glenn County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Humboldt County 7,9 8.6 (5.5, 12.8) 5 2007-2011 falling falling trend -16 (-26.6, -3.9)
Imperial County 7,9 8.5 (5.8, 12.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.4 (-31.4, 71.2)
Inyo County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kern County 7,9 9.1 (7.7, 10.6) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-23.5, 29.2)
Kings County 7,9 10.2 (6.8, 14.5) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-35.6, 54.5)
Lake County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lassen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Los Angeles County 7,9 9.2 (8.8, 9.6) 457 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5 (-7.9, -2.0)
Madera County 7,9 13.5 (10.0, 17.8) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-31.6, 43.1)
Marin County 7,8 5.0 (3.5, 7.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.4, 0.2)
Mariposa County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mendocino County 7,9 12.1 (7.6, 18.1) 5 2007-2011 rising rising trend 20.1 (0.6, 43.5)
Merced County 7,9 9.5 (7.0, 12.4) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.1 (-31.1, 17.3)
Modoc County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mono County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Monterey County 7,9 7.3 (5.6, 9.2) 14 2007-2011 rising rising trend 15 (0.3, 31.9)
Napa County 7,9 6.2 (3.9, 9.5) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.5 (-21.1, 52.0)
Nevada County 7,9 6.6 (3.6, 11.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 35.2 (-30.0, 161.1)
Orange County 7,9 6.7 (6.1, 7.3) 103 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-10.4, 1.9)
Placer County 7,9 5.8 (4.3, 7.6) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.8 (-16.8, 24.5)
Plumas County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Riverside County 7,9 8.5 (7.7, 9.3) 87 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-14.6, 8.0)
Sacramento County 7,9 8.8 (7.8, 9.8) 63 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.2 (-16.4, 9.8)
San Benito County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
San Bernardino County 7,9 8.7 (7.9, 9.6) 84 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-7.1, 8.1)
San Diego County 7,9 7.5 (6.9, 8.2) 116 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.4 (-13.5, 5.8)
San Francisco County 7,8 6.1 (5.1, 7.2) 28 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5 (-6.3, -3.7)
San Joaquin County 7,9 6.4 (5.2, 7.7) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.7 (-13.1, 4.5)
San Luis Obispo County 7,9 4.7 (3.1, 6.7) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.9 (-23.3, 38.2)
San Mateo County 7,8 6.0 (5.0, 7.2) 24 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Santa Barbara County 7,9 6.5 (5.0, 8.3) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.2 (-24.0, 15.8)
Santa Clara County 7,9 6.5 (5.8, 7.3) 59 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.0, -1.1)
Santa Cruz County 7,9 8.0 (5.9, 10.5) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.6 (-42.3, 35.5)
Shasta County 7,9 7.1 (4.8, 10.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.5 (-30.9, 76.6)
Sierra County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Siskiyou County 7,9 19.2 (11.3, 30.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.5 (-27.5, 65.4)
Solano County 7,9 7.3 (5.8, 9.1) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.2 (-21.6, 14.7)
Sonoma County 7,9 6.0 (4.7, 7.6) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-12.9, 4.7)
Stanislaus County 7,9 7.6 (6.2, 9.4) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8 (-15.3, 37.7)
Sutter County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tehama County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-50.0, 60.9)
Trinity County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Tulare County 7,9 10.0 (8.1, 12.2) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.9 (-28.1, 25.8)
Tuolumne County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ventura County 7,9 7.2 (6.1, 8.5) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.6 (-34.4, 19.2)
Yolo County 7,9 7.5 (5.1, 10.5) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.7 (-25.5, 38.9)
Yuba County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/20/2014 9:06 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2013 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top