State Cancer Profiles

Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/28/2015 11:05 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
Incidence Rate Report for California by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Cervix, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)
Average Annual Count
over rate period
Rate Period Recent Trend Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
California3 7.7 (7.5, 7.9) 1,459 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR)1,10 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) 12,476 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Siskiyou County7,9 15.6 (8.6, 25.8) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Mendocino County7,9 11.8 (7.4, 17.8) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Madera County7,9 11.8 (8.6, 15.8) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Kings County7,9 11.1 (7.6, 15.6) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Tulare County7,9 10.7 (8.7, 13.0) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-24.2, 22.7)
Kern County7,9 9.6 (8.2, 11.1) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-19.6, 15.0)
San Bernardino County7,9 9.3 (8.5, 10.2) 91 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.4 (-6.9, 14.8)
Yuba County7,9 9.3 (5.2, 15.1) 3 2008-2012
*
*
Imperial County7,9 8.9 (6.2, 12.4) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Los Angeles County7,9 8.8 (8.5, 9.2) 446 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.7, -1.8)
Merced County7,9 8.4 (6.2, 11.2) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Riverside County7,9 8.4 (7.6, 9.2) 88 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.3 (-12.2, 0.0)
Fresno County7,9 8.3 (7.1, 9.7) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-14.1, 11.9)
Sacramento County7,9 8.2 (7.3, 9.2) 60 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-10.5, 10.0)
Stanislaus County7,9 8.0 (6.5, 9.8) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.7 (-19.5, 25.9)
Humboldt County7,9 8.0 (5.1, 11.9) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Shasta County7,9 7.9 (5.4, 11.1) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Ventura County7,9 7.5 (6.3, 8.8) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.5 (-31.1, 24.2)
Santa Cruz County7,9 7.4 (5.5, 9.9) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Yolo County7,9 7.4 (5.1, 10.4) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Monterey County7,9 7.2 (5.6, 9.1) 14 2008-2012
*
*
San Diego County7,9 7.2 (6.6, 7.8) 112 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.6 (-11.6, 7.2)
Solano County7,9 7.1 (5.6, 8.9) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-19.2, 20.5)
Butte County7,9 6.9 (4.8, 9.7) 7 2008-2012
*
*
San Joaquin County7,9 6.9 (5.7, 8.3) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.8 (-11.5, 33.9)
Alameda County7,8 6.6 (5.9, 7.5) 53 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.1 (-2.3, 13.0)
El Dorado County7,9 6.6 (4.4, 9.5) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Napa County7,9 6.5 (4.1, 9.8) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Orange County7,9 6.5 (5.9, 7.1) 101 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-10.4, 1.4)
San Mateo County7,8 6.4 (5.4, 7.7) 26 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.8)
Contra Costa County7,8 6.2 (5.3, 7.2) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.1 (-1.0, 11.7)
Sonoma County7,9 6.2 (4.8, 7.8) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-12.8, 15.1)
Santa Barbara County7,9 6.1 (4.7, 7.9) 13 2008-2012
*
*
San Francisco County7,8 6.0 (5.0, 7.2) 27 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.0, -3.4)
Placer County7,9 6.0 (4.5, 7.8) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Santa Clara County7,9 5.9 (5.2, 6.7) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.6 (-18.8, 0.7)
Marin County7,8 4.8 (3.3, 6.8) 7 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
San Luis Obispo County7,9 4.6 (3.1, 6.6) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Alpine County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Amador County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Calaveras County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Colusa County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Del Norte County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Glenn County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Inyo County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lake County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Lassen County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Mariposa County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Modoc County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Mono County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Nevada County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Plumas County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
San Benito County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Sierra County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Sutter County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Tehama County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Trinity County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Tuolumne County7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*