Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Ovary, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
California 3,9 12.1 (11.9, 12.3) 2,412 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.8 (11.8, 11.9) 21,341 § falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Alameda County 7,8 12.9 (11.8, 14.1) 107 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.5, 0.0)
Alpine County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Amador County 7,9 16.3 (9.5, 26.7) 4
*
*
Butte County 7,9 11.7 (9.2, 14.8) 16 stable stable trend 6.6 (-2.1, 16.2)
Calaveras County 7,9 9.8 (5.3, 17.0) 3
*
*
Colusa County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Contra Costa County 7,8 12.4 (11.2, 13.8) 77 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Del Norte County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
El Dorado County 7,9 12.9 (10.0, 16.4) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-41.8, 70.2)
Fresno County 7,9 11.9 (10.5, 13.5) 52 falling falling trend -5.3 (-9.1, -1.3)
Glenn County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County 7,9 10.7 (7.7, 14.6) 9
*
*
Imperial County 7,9 8.9 (6.3, 12.3) 8
*
*
Inyo County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kern County 7,9 11.6 (10.0, 13.3) 42 stable stable trend 0.1 (-16.4, 19.7)
Kings County 7,9 9.9 (6.6, 14.3) 6
*
*
Lake County 7,9 11.7 (7.6, 17.5) 6
*
*
Lassen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Los Angeles County 7,9 12.5 (12.0, 12.9) 644 stable stable trend -0.5 (-6.1, 5.3)
Madera County 7,9 7.4 (4.9, 10.7) 6
*
*
Marin County 7,8 14.3 (11.9, 17.2) 26 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Mariposa County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mendocino County 7,9 11.8 (8.1, 16.8) 7
*
*
Merced County 7,9 10.8 (8.3, 13.9) 12
*
*
Modoc County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mono County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monterey County 7,9 9.5 (7.7, 11.7) 19 stable stable trend 9.2 (-5.2, 25.9)
Napa County 7,9 11.9 (8.9, 15.7) 11
*
*
Nevada County 7,9 13.6 (10.1, 18.2) 11
*
*
Orange County 7,9 12.7 (12.0, 13.5) 209 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.2, 3.4)
Placer County 7,9 12.4 (10.4, 14.7) 28 stable stable trend -4.3 (-35.2, 41.3)
Plumas County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Riverside County 7,9 11.4 (10.6, 12.4) 129 stable stable trend -8.4 (-19.0, 3.7)
Sacramento County 7,9 10.6 (9.6, 11.7) 82 stable stable trend -2.8 (-11.4, 6.5)
San Benito County 7,9 12.3 (7.2, 19.7) 4
*
*
San Bernardino County 7,9 12.8 (11.8, 13.9) 120 stable stable trend -1.3 (-9.9, 8.1)
San Diego County 7,9 11.8 (11.1, 12.6) 195 falling falling trend -7.7 (-13.6, -1.4)
San Francisco County 7,8 11.2 (9.9, 12.7) 53 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
San Joaquin County 7,9 10.8 (9.3, 12.5) 36 stable stable trend 0.4 (-17.2, 21.8)
San Luis Obispo County 7,9 11.3 (9.1, 14.0) 19 stable stable trend 0.5 (-20.8, 27.7)
San Mateo County 7,8 13.1 (11.7, 14.8) 59 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.1)
Santa Barbara County 7,9 11.4 (9.5, 13.5) 26 stable stable trend 1.8 (-23.9, 36.2)
Santa Clara County 7,9 11.9 (11.0, 13.0) 112 stable stable trend 1.8 (-6.4, 10.6)
Santa Cruz County 7,9 11.2 (8.8, 14.1) 16 stable stable trend 13.8 (-1.2, 31.0)
Shasta County 7,9 12.4 (9.6, 15.8) 15 stable stable trend -9.1 (-17.6, 0.2)
Sierra County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Siskiyou County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Solano County 7,9 13.0 (11.0, 15.3) 29 falling falling trend -16.5 (-28.5, -2.4)
Sonoma County 7,9 13.3 (11.5, 15.4) 40 stable stable trend 3.9 (-6.0, 14.7)
Stanislaus County 7,9 11.1 (9.3, 13.1) 28 stable stable trend -0.5 (-13.9, 15.0)
Sutter County 7,9 8.8 (5.4, 13.5) 4
*
*
Tehama County 7,9 9.0 (5.4, 14.2) 4
*
*
Trinity County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tulare County 7,9 11.8 (9.7, 14.1) 23 stable stable trend -3.0 (-30.9, 36.2)
Tuolumne County 7,9 15.6 (10.2, 23.2) 6
*
*
Ventura County 7,9 12.9 (11.5, 14.5) 58 stable stable trend -7.8 (-22.8, 10.0)
Yolo County 7,9 11.7 (8.8, 15.2) 11
*
*
Yuba County 7,9 11.0 (6.5, 17.5) 4
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/01/2016 6:37 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top