## Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data

### Incidence Rate Report for by County

All Cancer Sites, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

**Explanation of Column Headers**

**Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval)**- The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.

**Recent Trends** - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:

**Rising**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.**Stable**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.**Falling**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.

**AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval)** - the change in rate over time

- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.

**Other Notes**

**Line by Line Interpretation of the Report**

#### Colorado^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 421.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 418.9 to 424.1 and 21,117 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.5 to -1.5.

#### US (SEER+NPCR)^{1,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 453.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 453.5 to 454.1 and 1,526,274 § average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.9 to -1.2.

#### San Juan County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 460.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 241.5 to 798.9 and 3 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

#### Huerfano County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 454.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 396.2 to 521.1 and 52 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -19.6 to 17.3.

#### Fremont County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 454.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 430.7 to 479.0 and 288 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.5 to 4.3.

#### El Paso County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 451.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 443.1 to 459.0 and 2,600 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.2 to 1.1.

#### Hinsdale County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 444.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 273.4 to 694.8 and 5 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

#### Custer County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 439.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 363.3 to 531.1 and 31 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.1 to 9.7.

#### Denver County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 439.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 431.3 to 447.2 and 2,459 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.1 to 0.4.

#### Jefferson County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 436.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 429.0 to 444.4 and 2,635 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.6 to 1.5.

#### Pueblo County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 436.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 422.6 to 449.7 and 832 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.9 to 2.1.

#### Montezuma County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 435.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 404.0 to 469.7 and 148 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -5.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.3 to 5.4.

#### Arapahoe County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 429.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 421.5 to 437.5 and 2,362 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.2 to -1.1.

#### Teller County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 429.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 390.9 to 470.2 and 123 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -8.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -19.3 to 4.5.

#### Yuma County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 427.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 376.7 to 482.8 and 54 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -5.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -33.4 to 35.3.

#### Douglas County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 424.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 411.0 to 437.3 and 984 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.0 to 3.7.

#### Adams County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 420.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 411.1 to 430.7 and 1,522 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -3.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.5 to -1.4.

#### Broomfield County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 417.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 392.1 to 443.6 and 215 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.5 to 7.8.

#### Clear Creek County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 416.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 360.7 to 480.0 and 50 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -11.8 to 9.5.

#### Alamosa County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 416.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 370.8 to 466.9 and 62 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 4.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.9 to 15.4.

#### La Plata County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 415.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 390.8 to 441.3 and 233 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -5.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.8 to -2.8.

#### Mesa County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 414.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 401.2 to 428.9 and 724 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -2.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.4 to -1.3.

#### Phillips County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 414.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 341.8 to 498.8 and 26 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 3.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.0 to 18.2.

#### Mineral County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 413.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 271.9 to 640.8 and 6 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : * Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

#### Elbert County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 410.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 371.5 to 453.3 and 102 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -12.4 to 10.4.

#### Boulder County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 409.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 399.1 to 421.0 and 1,159 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.7 to 0.7.

#### Morgan County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 408.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 376.4 to 441.7 and 126 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.6 to 4.2.

#### Rio Blanco County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 407.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 342.4 to 481.4 and 29 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -20.4 to 23.0.

#### Prowers County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 405.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 359.2 to 455.9 and 58 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -5.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -12.6 to 3.2.

#### Moffat County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 403.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 355.7 to 456.7 and 55 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -6.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -23.2 to 14.8.

#### Park County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 402.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 354.1 to 454.9 and 74 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -5.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -15.9 to 6.2.

#### Logan County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 400.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 366.5 to 436.9 and 105 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -4.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -13.8 to 6.8.

#### Gilpin County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 400.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 312.9 to 504.2 and 22 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -6.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -30.2 to 24.9.

#### Otero County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 400.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 364.5 to 438.3 and 100 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.7 to 13.0.

#### Delta County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 396.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 369.2 to 424.8 and 178 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.2 to 5.5.

#### Larimer County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 395.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 385.2 to 405.5 and 1,230 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.3 to 0.1.

#### Chaffee County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 392.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 357.9 to 429.2 and 105 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.4 to 2.2.

#### Kit Carson County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 389.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 336.8 to 449.2 and 40 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.5 to 9.8.

#### Weld County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 389.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 377.7 to 401.5 and 883 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.2 to 0.5.

#### Archuleta County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 389.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 345.6 to 437.7 and 68 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -17.3 to 13.3.

#### Crowley County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 389.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 317.5 to 472.8 and 22 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -15.2 to 19.0.

#### Montrose County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 382.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 358.5 to 407.1 and 208 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.9 to 1.3.

#### Washington County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 381.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 315.9 to 458.4 and 26 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -15.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -31.4 to 5.4.

#### Garfield County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 379.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 354.2 to 406.3 and 183 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -13.3 to 6.9.

#### Rio Grande County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 379.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 336.2 to 427.3 and 59 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -4.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -19.2 to 13.8.

#### Kiowa County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 373.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 260.7 to 526.2 and 8 average annual cases over 2008-2012.

#### Cheyenne County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 373.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 272.6 to 503.7 and 10 average annual cases over 2008-2012.

#### Routt County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 373.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 332.8 to 416.7 and 81 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.6 to 6.5.

#### Lincoln County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 372.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 310.4 to 445.1 and 26 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -17.1 to 25.1.

#### Las Animas County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 372.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 335.0 to 412.3 and 80 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.4 to 6.2.

#### Baca County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 369.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 301.5 to 451.2 and 24 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -27.8 to 41.3.

#### Sedgwick County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 364.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 280.7 to 468.7 and 15 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -15.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -25.4 to -4.4.

#### San Miguel County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 358.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 276.6 to 455.6 and 22 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -14.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -30.7 to 5.2.

#### Lake County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 357.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 290.6 to 434.6 and 23 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -12.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -20.4 to -2.9.

#### Eagle County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 347.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 315.5 to 380.8 and 138 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.2 to 2.9.

#### Saguache County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 337.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 275.8 to 408.3 and 24 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -10.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -20.3 to 0.5.

#### Conejos County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 326.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 277.6 to 382.1 and 33 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -27.8 to 38.3.

#### Bent County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 322.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 266.6 to 387.3 and 24 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.4 to 7.9.

#### Pitkin County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 318.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 281.2 to 359.6 and 64 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -6.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -15.8 to 5.0.

#### Grand County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 310.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 268.4 to 357.4 and 47 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -8.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -17.0 to 0.3.

#### Costilla County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 307.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 241.7 to 388.0 and 17 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 17.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.3 to 49.0.

#### Ouray County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 307.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 242.1 to 386.5 and 20 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -16.3 to 11.8.

#### Gunnison County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 283.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 242.8 to 329.1 and 40 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -13.3 to 15.4.

#### Jackson County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 279.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 181.4 to 421.1 and 6 average annual cases over 2008-2012.

#### Summit County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 259.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 225.6 to 296.0 and 66 average annual cases over 2008-2012.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 4.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.9 to 17.7.

#### Dolores County^{6,10}

- Rate : The incidence rate is 234.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 157.2 to 338.6 and 7 average annual cases over 2008-2012.

**Notes:**

Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/05/2016 12:11 pm.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

^{1}Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.

^{6}Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.

^{10}Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.