Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Colorado by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Colorado 6,10 36.9 (36.1, 37.7) 1,737 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4 (-6.7, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 43.3 (43.2, 43.4) 142,173 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.9, -3.3)
Denver County 6,10 38.6 (36.2, 41.0) 209 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.5 (-13.3, 2.9)
El Paso County 6,10 38.0 (35.7, 40.5) 204 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-15.8, 13.3)
Jefferson County 6,10 35.8 (33.6, 38.1) 204 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.2 (-8.5, 2.4)
Arapahoe County 6,10 37.5 (35.1, 40.0) 192 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.2 (-8.1, -0.2)
Adams County 6,10 44.0 (40.7, 47.4) 143 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.4 (-19.2, -0.6)
Larimer County 6,10 32.8 (29.9, 36.0) 95 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-13.3, 11.7)
Boulder County 6,10 34.6 (31.4, 38.0) 91 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-18.9, 0.3)
Pueblo County 6,10 43.3 (39.2, 47.8) 82 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.2 (-22.8, 11.6)
Weld County 6,10 34.8 (31.2, 38.7) 72 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.4 (-8.2, 12.0)
Douglas County 6,10 35.6 (31.6, 40.1) 69 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.3 (-12.5, 15.0)
Mesa County 6,10 34.9 (31.0, 39.1) 60 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-17.6, 20.5)
Fremont County 6,10 39.8 (33.0, 47.7) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.3 (-16.8, 43.7)
Broomfield County 6,10 37.5 (29.7, 46.6) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.3 (-27.4, 10.8)
La Plata County 6,10 30.3 (23.6, 38.2) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.3 (-12.9, 32.3)
Montrose County 6,10 28.3 (22.1, 35.7) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.1 (-22.9, 12.1)
Delta County 6,10 30.4 (23.7, 38.7) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-23.8, 14.9)
Otero County 6,10 56.3 (43.8, 71.6) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.6 (-24.2, 15.1)
Morgan County 6,10 39.9 (30.4, 51.4) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.8 (-31.0, 59.2)
Garfield County 6,10 26.5 (19.9, 34.5) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2 (-12.3, 9.5)
Montezuma County 6,10 33.3 (24.9, 43.8) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.1 (-31.5, 2.8)
Logan County 6,10 38.4 (28.5, 50.8) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.8 (-12.4, 23.1)
Las Animas County 6,10 43.2 (31.7, 58.1) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.8 (-15.7, 40.3)
Chaffee County 6,10 31.3 (22.4, 43.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.7 (-19.8, 31.6)
Huerfano County 6,10 76.9 (53.6, 108.7) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.7 (-23.7, 16.6)
Rio Grande County 6,10 54.9 (39.4, 75.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 23.4 (-9.2, 67.7)
Eagle County 6,10 24.1 (15.1, 36.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.9 (-31.9, 64.6)
Yuma County 6,10 63.1 (44.8, 87.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.6 (-23.6, 60.1)
Teller County 6,10 30.2 (20.1, 43.7) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 24.4 (-32.6, 129.8)
Prowers County 6,10 52.4 (36.4, 73.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.7 (-41.0, 50.6)
Alamosa County 6,10 44.6 (30.7, 62.6) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.8 (-39.3, 55.5)
Elbert County 6,10 29.0 (18.9, 42.6) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.8 (-31.6, 66.7)
Moffat County 6,10 52.2 (35.5, 73.8) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-56.5, 110.4)
Archuleta County 6,10 34.9 (22.8, 52.0) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.3 (-30.6, 75.3)
Summit County 6,10 26.2 (15.1, 41.9) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.5 (-45.9, 16.8)
Routt County 6,10 22.9 (14.0, 35.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.5 (-45.1, 69.5)
Park County 6,10 35.9 (21.2, 56.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-35.3, 56.6)
Baca County 6,10 50.6 (29.6, 85.6) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.2 (-40.9, 39.4)
Conejos County 6,10 33.0 (19.1, 53.7) 3 2007-2011 rising rising trend 28.1 (1.7, 61.4)
Bent County 6,10 44.0 (25.1, 72.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.8 (-52.7, 60.5)
Clear Creek County 6,10 30.2 (15.8, 52.8) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -23.3 (-77.7, 164.4)
Grand County 6,10 29.5 (15.4, 50.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.5 (-37.6, 40.1)
Kit Carson County 6,10 33.2 (18.8, 54.7) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-30.3, 49.7)
Pitkin County 6,10 20.4 (10.6, 35.3) 3 2007-2011 falling falling trend -39.1 (-58.8, -10.0)
Cheyenne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Costilla County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Crowley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Custer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dolores County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Gilpin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -27.7 (-72.1, 87.2)
Gunnison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Hinsdale County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kiowa County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lake County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lincoln County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mineral County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ouray County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Phillips County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Rio Blanco County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Saguache County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
San Juan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
San Miguel County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sedgwick County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/24/2014 12:10 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top