Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Florida by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Melanoma of the Skin, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Florida 6,10 14.5 (14.2, 14.8) 1,711 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-6.3, 7.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 15.8 (15.7, 15.9) 26,903 § 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Miami-Dade County 6,10 6.6 (6.0, 7.2) 99 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-8.1, 0.6)
Clay County 6,10 11.1 (8.4, 14.5) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.5 (-22.9, 52.8)
Osceola County 6,10 11.4 (9.0, 14.3) 15 2007-2011 rising rising trend 13.7 (0.2, 28.9)
Orange County 6,10 11.8 (10.5, 13.1) 66 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.1 (-13.4, 15.2)
Escambia County 6,10 12.5 (10.2, 15.2) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.3 (-24.1, 35.2)
Duval County 6,10 12.6 (11.2, 14.1) 59 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.4 (-10.2, 23.7)
Walton County 6,10 12.7 (7.8, 19.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.5 (-42.7, 90.5)
Broward County 6,10 13.2 (12.2, 14.2) 144 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.5 (-15.9, 3.9)
Citrus County 6,10 13.5 (10.3, 17.7) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-36.8, 34.4)
Volusia County 6,10 13.7 (11.9, 15.7) 49 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.9 (-15.9, 33.4)
Leon County 6,10 13.7 (10.9, 16.9) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-24.8, 28.2)
Marion County 6,10 14.4 (12.2, 16.9) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-24.5, 29.4)
Seminole County 6,10 14.5 (12.4, 16.9) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-16.3, 9.0)
Okeechobee County 6,10 14.5 (8.5, 23.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -33.6 (-66.3, 30.9)
Sumter County 6,10 14.7 (9.5, 22.3) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-26.9, 21.2)
Putnam County 6,10 14.8 (10.2, 21.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.7 (-31.9, 25.1)
Hillsborough County 6,10 14.9 (13.5, 16.2) 97 2007-2011 rising rising trend 7.9 (4.3, 11.6)
Alachua County 6,10 15.0 (12.0, 18.6) 18 2007-2011 rising rising trend 34.9 (10.5, 64.7)
Pinellas County 6,10 15.4 (13.9, 16.9) 98 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.4 (-14.4, 20.0)
Bay County 6,10 16.1 (12.6, 20.3) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.2 (-25.0, 17.5)
Charlotte County 6,10 16.3 (12.6, 20.8) 22 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.4 (-40.6, 50.5)
Okaloosa County 6,10 16.3 (12.9, 20.4) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.3 (-19.5, 11.4)
Flagler County 6,10 16.5 (12.1, 21.9) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 23 (-37.1, 140.6)
Nassau County 6,10 16.5 (11.7, 22.8) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 21.6 (-0.7, 49.0)
St. Lucie County 6,10 16.7 (14.0, 19.7) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend -17.1 (-32.6, 2.0)
Lee County 6,10 17.1 (15.2, 19.1) 72 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-9.1, 8.0)
St. Johns County 6,10 17.1 (13.7, 21.0) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.4 (-16.3, 22.8)
Monroe County 6,10 17.1 (11.8, 24.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-43.5, 50.1)
Manatee County 6,10 17.2 (14.6, 20.2) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.1 (-18.1, 42.7)
Brevard County 6,10 17.3 (15.3, 19.4) 64 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-21.0, 23.5)
Collier County 6,10 17.3 (14.8, 20.2) 40 2007-2011 falling falling trend -16.3 (-21.7, -10.5)
Palm Beach County 6,10 17.4 (16.1, 18.7) 162 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.5 (-11.0, 6.8)
Santa Rosa County 6,10 17.5 (13.5, 22.2) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-23.3, 28.3)
Lake County 6,10 18.1 (15.4, 21.1) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.1 (-13.7, 27.9)
Pasco County 6,10 19.7 (17.4, 22.2) 59 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.2 (-4.6, 22.8)
Hernando County 6,10 20.0 (16.3, 24.3) 25 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.2 (-14.1, -6.0)
Sarasota County 6,10 20.2 (17.6, 23.1) 62 2007-2011 stable stable trend 16.3 (-10.8, 51.5)
Columbia County 6,10 21.2 (14.9, 29.2) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 22.5 (-21.8, 91.8)
Highlands County 6,10 21.5 (16.6, 27.6) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.8 (-10.1, 24.5)
Polk County 6,10 21.7 (19.5, 24.0) 78 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-13.6, 9.8)
DeSoto County 6,10 22.4 (13.1, 36.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 15 (-43.4, 133.9)
Indian River County 6,10 22.6 (18.2, 27.7) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.9 (-1.0, 21.9)
Martin County 6,10 22.9 (18.9, 27.8) 28 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.5 (-20.0, 33.8)
Baker County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bradford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Dixie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Gadsden County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Gilchrist County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Glades County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Gulf County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hamilton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hardee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hendry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Holmes County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jackson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lafayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Levy County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Liberty County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Madison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Suwannee County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Taylor County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wakulla County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/21/2014 6:23 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top