Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3,9 36.7 (35.9, 37.4) 1,869 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 36.6 (36.5, 36.7) 67,886 § falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.2)
Appling County 7,9 37.7 (23.1, 58.5) 4
*
*
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baldwin County 7,9 39.5 (28.9, 52.8) 9
*
*
Banks County 7,9 40.4 (24.3, 63.3) 4
*
*
Barrow County 7,9 29.0 (21.4, 38.6) 10
*
*
Bartow County 7,9 46.9 (38.8, 56.1) 24 falling falling trend -11.7 (-21.5, -0.7)
Ben Hill County 7,9 31.2 (18.4, 50.2) 4
*
*
Berrien County 7,9 41.9 (27.2, 62.4) 5
*
*
Bibb County 7,9 44.4 (38.5, 51.0) 42 stable stable trend -6.4 (-18.1, 7.0)
Bleckley County 7,9 36.9 (21.3, 60.8) 3
*
*
Brantley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7,9 29.6 (17.1, 48.8) 3
*
*
Bryan County 7,9 49.7 (34.2, 69.7) 7
*
*
Bulloch County 7,9 20.1 (13.5, 28.7) 6
*
*
Burke County 7,9 75.1 (55.5, 99.4) 10
*
*
Butts County 7,9 27.3 (16.0, 43.8) 4
*
*
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Camden County 7,9 42.5 (30.8, 57.0) 9
*
*
Candler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County 7,9 44.5 (37.0, 53.2) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-15.4, 14.9)
Catoosa County 7,9 30.8 (23.4, 39.8) 12
*
*
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chatham County 7,9 35.6 (31.4, 40.1) 55 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.5, 5.3)
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattooga County 7,9 30.4 (19.7, 45.2) 5
*
*
Cherokee County 7,9 33.8 (28.8, 39.5) 34 stable stable trend -2.7 (-21.7, 21.0)
Clarke County 7,9 37.4 (30.0, 45.9) 19 stable stable trend 6.8 (-14.5, 33.4)
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clayton County 7,8 40.6 (35.1, 46.6) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Clinch County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cobb County 7,8 33.5 (30.7, 36.6) 109 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.2, -1.5)
Coffee County 7,9 39.9 (28.9, 53.6) 9
*
*
Colquitt County 7,9 30.4 (21.6, 41.7) 8
*
*
Columbia County 7,9 33.0 (26.9, 40.2) 21 stable stable trend 2.3 (-22.3, 34.7)
Cook County 7,9 36.8 (21.6, 58.7) 4
*
*
Coweta County 7,9 36.5 (30.0, 43.9) 23 stable stable trend -8.1 (-24.7, 12.1)
Crawford County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crisp County 7,9 48.8 (34.3, 67.8) 8
*
*
Dade County 7,9 32.1 (18.7, 52.4) 3
*
*
Dawson County 7,9 32.3 (19.7, 50.5) 4
*
*
DeKalb County 7,8 37.9 (35.0, 41.0) 129 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Decatur County 7,9 33.7 (22.8, 48.3) 6
*
*
Dodge County 7,9 50.6 (34.1, 72.6) 6
*
*
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dougherty County 7,9 38.1 (31.1, 46.2) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-21.2, 28.7)
Douglas County 7,9 45.3 (37.8, 53.9) 28 stable stable trend 4.8 (-10.4, 22.6)
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Effingham County 7,9 44.3 (32.6, 58.7) 10
*
*
Elbert County 7,9 38.1 (24.8, 56.6) 5
*
*
Emanuel County 7,9 43.0 (28.5, 62.5) 6
*
*
Evans County 7,9 47.2 (27.0, 77.6) 3
*
*
Fannin County 7,9 26.6 (17.0, 40.8) 5
*
*
Fayette County 7,9 32.6 (26.6, 39.6) 22 stable stable trend -6.0 (-25.0, 17.9)
Floyd County 7,9 35.3 (28.9, 42.9) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-19.3, 25.4)
Forsyth County 7,9 33.8 (28.1, 40.3) 27 stable stable trend -4.7 (-33.7, 37.0)
Franklin County 7,9 44.3 (30.2, 63.2) 7
*
*
Fulton County 7,8 36.7 (34.1, 39.3) 163 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Gilmer County 7,9 27.7 (18.2, 41.0) 6
*
*
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glynn County 7,9 33.1 (26.3, 41.1) 17 stable stable trend 3.3 (-11.0, 19.9)
Gordon County 7,9 45.7 (35.4, 58.2) 14
*
*
Grady County 7,9 48.0 (33.8, 66.4) 8
*
*
Greene County 7 30.2 (17.8, 49.5) 4
*
*
Gwinnett County 7,8 33.0 (30.1, 36.0) 109 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Habersham County 7,9 39.5 (29.6, 51.8) 11
*
*
Hall County 7,9 34.1 (28.9, 40.0) 31 stable stable trend 5.4 (-5.7, 17.6)
Hancock County 7 65.1 (36.9, 108.0) 4
*
*
Haralson County 7,9 46.5 (33.2, 63.6) 8
*
*
Harris County 7,9 33.6 (23.0, 47.9) 7
*
*
Hart County 7,9 38.2 (26.9, 53.4) 8
*
*
Heard County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County 7,9 37.6 (32.0, 43.9) 34 stable stable trend 4.3 (-8.1, 18.3)
Houston County 7,9 42.6 (36.0, 50.0) 30 stable stable trend 5.4 (-17.9, 35.3)
Irwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jackson County 7,9 46.4 (36.3, 58.5) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (-23.4, 36.2)
Jasper County 7 40.8 (23.5, 66.6) 3
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7,9 52.4 (32.9, 79.6) 5
*
*
Jefferson County 7 42.6 (27.1, 64.5) 5
*
*
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jones County 7,9 19.5 (11.4, 31.5) 4
*
*
Lamar County 7,9 46.6 (30.0, 69.4) 5
*
*
Lanier County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Laurens County 7,9 36.1 (26.9, 47.5) 11
*
*
Lee County 7,9 46.4 (31.1, 66.5) 6
*
*
Liberty County 7,9 45.8 (33.1, 61.4) 10
*
*
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lowndes County 7,9 32.0 (25.5, 39.8) 17 stable stable trend -9.0 (-20.6, 4.3)
Lumpkin County 7,9 33.8 (22.0, 49.7) 5
*
*
Macon County 7,9 56.3 (36.0, 85.1) 5
*
*
Madison County 7,9 41.5 (28.7, 58.3) 7
*
*
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDuffie County 7,9 32.6 (20.6, 49.3) 5
*
*
McIntosh County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Meriwether County 7,9 47.2 (32.9, 66.0) 7
*
*
Miller County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mitchell County 7,9 43.5 (29.4, 62.5) 6
*
*
Monroe County 7,9 28.7 (18.5, 43.0) 5
*
*
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7 47.3 (31.3, 69.4) 6
*
*
Murray County 7,9 30.8 (21.1, 43.6) 7
*
*
Muscogee County 7,9 46.7 (41.0, 52.9) 50 stable stable trend -5.5 (-23.2, 16.2)
Newton County 7,9 39.3 (31.8, 47.9) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-21.1, 27.0)
Oconee County 7,9 33.2 (22.0, 48.2) 6
*
*
Oglethorpe County 7,9 45.1 (28.1, 69.6) 4
*
*
Paulding County 7,9 38.3 (31.3, 46.4) 23 stable stable trend -4.6 (-18.9, 12.1)
Peach County 7,9 39.3 (26.4, 56.6) 6
*
*
Pickens County 7,9 39.4 (27.8, 54.8) 8
*
*
Pierce County 7,9 34.4 (20.8, 54.1) 4
*
*
Pike County 7,9 37.5 (22.0, 60.0) 4
*
*
Polk County 7,9 44.9 (33.6, 58.8) 11
*
*
Pulaski County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 7 38.2 (25.0, 56.5) 6
*
*
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rabun County 7,9 38.0 (24.3, 58.2) 5
*
*
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Richmond County 7,9 32.0 (27.4, 37.2) 36 stable stable trend -9.5 (-24.9, 9.0)
Rockdale County 7,9 34.0 (26.7, 42.6) 16 stable stable trend 3.2 (-29.5, 50.9)
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Screven County 7,9 48.1 (29.0, 75.2) 4
*
*
Seminole County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spalding County 7,9 46.6 (37.3, 57.6) 18 stable stable trend -16.0 (-38.3, 14.3)
Stephens County 7,9 41.1 (28.9, 57.2) 8
*
*
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sumter County 7,9 38.0 (26.3, 53.2) 7
*
*
Talbot County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tattnall County 7,9 41.2 (26.8, 60.8) 5
*
*
Taylor County 7,9 54.5 (31.0, 90.5) 3
*
*
Telfair County 7,9 35.8 (20.5, 59.0) 3
*
*
Terrell County 7,9 71.4 (44.2, 110.3) 4
*
*
Thomas County 7,9 33.7 (24.9, 44.9) 10
*
*
Tift County 7,9 34.3 (24.4, 46.9) 8
*
*
Toombs County 7,9 25.9 (16.1, 39.6) 4
*
*
Towns County 7,9 30.1 (16.7, 55.1) 3
*
*
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Troup County 7,9 40.0 (31.6, 50.2) 16 stable stable trend -5.8 (-27.0, 21.6)
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County 7,9 22.0 (13.4, 35.9) 5
*
*
Upson County 7,9 45.0 (32.3, 61.4) 9
*
*
Walker County 7,9 27.0 (20.6, 35.0) 12
*
*
Walton County 7,9 33.0 (25.9, 41.4) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-14.6, 16.2)
Ware County 7,9 21.4 (14.2, 31.6) 6
*
*
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Washington County 7 41.2 (26.8, 60.8) 5
*
*
Wayne County 7,9 51.8 (36.9, 70.6) 8
*
*
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
White County 7,9 40.0 (28.0, 56.0) 8
*
*
Whitfield County 7,9 29.2 (23.0, 36.6) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-24.7, 28.5)
Wilcox County 7,9 56.8 (32.2, 95.6) 3
*
*
Wilkes County 7,9 46.6 (28.2, 74.8) 4
*
*
Wilkinson County 7,9 48.6 (28.1, 80.0) 3
*
*
Worth County 7,9 30.6 (19.2, 46.9) 5
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/26/2016 12:42 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top