Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3,9 36.7 (35.9, 37.4) 1,869 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.9, 1.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 36.6 (36.5, 36.7) 67,886 § falling falling trend -3.8 (-4.4, -3.2)
Burke County 7,9 75.1 (55.5, 99.4) 10
*
*
Terrell County 7,9 71.4 (44.2, 110.3) 4
*
*
Hancock County 7 65.1 (36.9, 108.0) 4
*
*
Wilcox County 7,9 56.8 (32.2, 95.6) 3
*
*
Macon County 7,9 56.3 (36.0, 85.1) 5
*
*
Taylor County 7,9 54.5 (31.0, 90.5) 3
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7,9 52.4 (32.9, 79.6) 5
*
*
Wayne County 7,9 51.8 (36.9, 70.6) 8
*
*
Dodge County 7,9 50.6 (34.1, 72.6) 6
*
*
Bryan County 7,9 49.7 (34.2, 69.7) 7
*
*
Crisp County 7,9 48.8 (34.3, 67.8) 8
*
*
Wilkinson County 7,9 48.6 (28.1, 80.0) 3
*
*
Screven County 7,9 48.1 (29.0, 75.2) 4
*
*
Grady County 7,9 48.0 (33.8, 66.4) 8
*
*
Morgan County 7 47.3 (31.3, 69.4) 6
*
*
Evans County 7,9 47.2 (27.0, 77.6) 3
*
*
Meriwether County 7,9 47.2 (32.9, 66.0) 7
*
*
Bartow County 7,9 46.9 (38.8, 56.1) 24 falling falling trend -11.7 (-21.5, -0.7)
Muscogee County 7,9 46.7 (41.0, 52.9) 50 stable stable trend -5.5 (-23.2, 16.2)
Spalding County 7,9 46.6 (37.3, 57.6) 18 stable stable trend -16.0 (-38.3, 14.3)
Wilkes County 7,9 46.6 (28.2, 74.8) 4
*
*
Lamar County 7,9 46.6 (30.0, 69.4) 5
*
*
Haralson County 7,9 46.5 (33.2, 63.6) 8
*
*
Jackson County 7,9 46.4 (36.3, 58.5) 15 stable stable trend 2.1 (-23.4, 36.2)
Lee County 7,9 46.4 (31.1, 66.5) 6
*
*
Liberty County 7,9 45.8 (33.1, 61.4) 10
*
*
Gordon County 7,9 45.7 (35.4, 58.2) 14
*
*
Douglas County 7,9 45.3 (37.8, 53.9) 28 stable stable trend 4.8 (-10.4, 22.6)
Oglethorpe County 7,9 45.1 (28.1, 69.6) 4
*
*
Upson County 7,9 45.0 (32.3, 61.4) 9
*
*
Polk County 7,9 44.9 (33.6, 58.8) 11
*
*
Carroll County 7,9 44.5 (37.0, 53.2) 25 stable stable trend -1.4 (-15.4, 14.9)
Bibb County 7,9 44.4 (38.5, 51.0) 42 stable stable trend -6.4 (-18.1, 7.0)
Effingham County 7,9 44.3 (32.6, 58.7) 10
*
*
Franklin County 7,9 44.3 (30.2, 63.2) 7
*
*
Mitchell County 7,9 43.5 (29.4, 62.5) 6
*
*
Emanuel County 7,9 43.0 (28.5, 62.5) 6
*
*
Jefferson County 7 42.6 (27.1, 64.5) 5
*
*
Houston County 7,9 42.6 (36.0, 50.0) 30 stable stable trend 5.4 (-17.9, 35.3)
Camden County 7,9 42.5 (30.8, 57.0) 9
*
*
Berrien County 7,9 41.9 (27.2, 62.4) 5
*
*
Madison County 7,9 41.5 (28.7, 58.3) 7
*
*
Tattnall County 7,9 41.2 (26.8, 60.8) 5
*
*
Washington County 7 41.2 (26.8, 60.8) 5
*
*
Stephens County 7,9 41.1 (28.9, 57.2) 8
*
*
Jasper County 7 40.8 (23.5, 66.6) 3
*
*
Clayton County 7,8 40.6 (35.1, 46.6) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Banks County 7,9 40.4 (24.3, 63.3) 4
*
*
Troup County 7,9 40.0 (31.6, 50.2) 16 stable stable trend -5.8 (-27.0, 21.6)
White County 7,9 40.0 (28.0, 56.0) 8
*
*
Coffee County 7,9 39.9 (28.9, 53.6) 9
*
*
Habersham County 7,9 39.5 (29.6, 51.8) 11
*
*
Baldwin County 7,9 39.5 (28.9, 52.8) 9
*
*
Pickens County 7,9 39.4 (27.8, 54.8) 8
*
*
Peach County 7,9 39.3 (26.4, 56.6) 6
*
*
Newton County 7,9 39.3 (31.8, 47.9) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-21.1, 27.0)
Paulding County 7,9 38.3 (31.3, 46.4) 23 stable stable trend -4.6 (-18.9, 12.1)
Hart County 7,9 38.2 (26.9, 53.4) 8
*
*
Putnam County 7 38.2 (25.0, 56.5) 6
*
*
Elbert County 7,9 38.1 (24.8, 56.6) 5
*
*
Dougherty County 7,9 38.1 (31.1, 46.2) 21 stable stable trend 0.7 (-21.2, 28.7)
Sumter County 7,9 38.0 (26.3, 53.2) 7
*
*
Rabun County 7,9 38.0 (24.3, 58.2) 5
*
*
DeKalb County 7,8 37.9 (35.0, 41.0) 129 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Appling County 7,9 37.7 (23.1, 58.5) 4
*
*
Henry County 7,9 37.6 (32.0, 43.9) 34 stable stable trend 4.3 (-8.1, 18.3)
Pike County 7,9 37.5 (22.0, 60.0) 4
*
*
Clarke County 7,9 37.4 (30.0, 45.9) 19 stable stable trend 6.8 (-14.5, 33.4)
Bleckley County 7,9 36.9 (21.3, 60.8) 3
*
*
Cook County 7,9 36.8 (21.6, 58.7) 4
*
*
Fulton County 7,8 36.7 (34.1, 39.3) 163 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.7)
Coweta County 7,9 36.5 (30.0, 43.9) 23 stable stable trend -8.1 (-24.7, 12.1)
Laurens County 7,9 36.1 (26.9, 47.5) 11
*
*
Telfair County 7,9 35.8 (20.5, 59.0) 3
*
*
Chatham County 7,9 35.6 (31.4, 40.1) 55 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.5, 5.3)
Floyd County 7,9 35.3 (28.9, 42.9) 21 stable stable trend 0.6 (-19.3, 25.4)
Pierce County 7,9 34.4 (20.8, 54.1) 4
*
*
Tift County 7,9 34.3 (24.4, 46.9) 8
*
*
Hall County 7,9 34.1 (28.9, 40.0) 31 stable stable trend 5.4 (-5.7, 17.6)
Rockdale County 7,9 34.0 (26.7, 42.6) 16 stable stable trend 3.2 (-29.5, 50.9)
Forsyth County 7,9 33.8 (28.1, 40.3) 27 stable stable trend -4.7 (-33.7, 37.0)
Cherokee County 7,9 33.8 (28.8, 39.5) 34 stable stable trend -2.7 (-21.7, 21.0)
Lumpkin County 7,9 33.8 (22.0, 49.7) 5
*
*
Thomas County 7,9 33.7 (24.9, 44.9) 10
*
*
Decatur County 7,9 33.7 (22.8, 48.3) 6
*
*
Harris County 7,9 33.6 (23.0, 47.9) 7
*
*
Cobb County 7,8 33.5 (30.7, 36.6) 109 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.2, -1.5)
Oconee County 7,9 33.2 (22.0, 48.2) 6
*
*
Glynn County 7,9 33.1 (26.3, 41.1) 17 stable stable trend 3.3 (-11.0, 19.9)
Columbia County 7,9 33.0 (26.9, 40.2) 21 stable stable trend 2.3 (-22.3, 34.7)
Gwinnett County 7,8 33.0 (30.1, 36.0) 109 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Walton County 7,9 33.0 (25.9, 41.4) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-14.6, 16.2)
McDuffie County 7,9 32.6 (20.6, 49.3) 5
*
*
Fayette County 7,9 32.6 (26.6, 39.6) 22 stable stable trend -6.0 (-25.0, 17.9)
Dawson County 7,9 32.3 (19.7, 50.5) 4
*
*
Dade County 7,9 32.1 (18.7, 52.4) 3
*
*
Lowndes County 7,9 32.0 (25.5, 39.8) 17 stable stable trend -9.0 (-20.6, 4.3)
Richmond County 7,9 32.0 (27.4, 37.2) 36 stable stable trend -9.5 (-24.9, 9.0)
Ben Hill County 7,9 31.2 (18.4, 50.2) 4
*
*
Murray County 7,9 30.8 (21.1, 43.6) 7
*
*
Catoosa County 7,9 30.8 (23.4, 39.8) 12
*
*
Worth County 7,9 30.6 (19.2, 46.9) 5
*
*
Colquitt County 7,9 30.4 (21.6, 41.7) 8
*
*
Chattooga County 7,9 30.4 (19.7, 45.2) 5
*
*
Greene County 7 30.2 (17.8, 49.5) 4
*
*
Towns County 7,9 30.1 (16.7, 55.1) 3
*
*
Brooks County 7,9 29.6 (17.1, 48.8) 3
*
*
Whitfield County 7,9 29.2 (23.0, 36.6) 15 stable stable trend -1.6 (-24.7, 28.5)
Barrow County 7,9 29.0 (21.4, 38.6) 10
*
*
Monroe County 7,9 28.7 (18.5, 43.0) 5
*
*
Gilmer County 7,9 27.7 (18.2, 41.0) 6
*
*
Butts County 7,9 27.3 (16.0, 43.8) 4
*
*
Walker County 7,9 27.0 (20.6, 35.0) 12
*
*
Fannin County 7,9 26.6 (17.0, 40.8) 5
*
*
Toombs County 7,9 25.9 (16.1, 39.6) 4
*
*
Union County 7,9 22.0 (13.4, 35.9) 5
*
*
Ware County 7,9 21.4 (14.2, 31.6) 6
*
*
Bulloch County 7,9 20.1 (13.5, 28.7) 6
*
*
Jones County 7,9 19.5 (11.4, 31.5) 4
*
*
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bacon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brantley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Candler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clinch County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Heard County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Johnson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lanier County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Long County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McIntosh County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Miller County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Seminole County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Talbot County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Twiggs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/01/2016 9:25 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top