Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3 68.8 (68.0, 69.6) 6,264 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 63.7 (63.6, 63.8) 213,812 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Appling County 7,9 70.0 (54.5, 88.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Atkinson County 7,9 62.8 (40.2, 93.5) 5 2008-2012 * *
Bacon County 7,9 71.9 (52.7, 96.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Baker County 7,9 82.2 (47.9, 133.3) 4 2008-2012 * *
Baldwin County 7,9 73.1 (62.5, 84.9) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-9.6, 13.0)
Banks County 7,9 68.3 (52.5, 87.4) 14 2008-2012 * *
Barrow County 7,9 87.9 (77.2, 99.6) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.7 (-7.1, 27.1)
Bartow County 7,9 95.6 (86.8, 105.0) 92 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-15.2, 6.4)
Ben Hill County 7,9 80.4 (64.0, 99.9) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.8 (-18.5, 32.3)
Berrien County 7,9 77.4 (61.7, 96.0) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.8 (-27.0, 26.8)
Bibb County 7,9 76.3 (70.4, 82.5) 127 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.2 (-3.5, 10.3)
Bleckley County 7,9 79.0 (60.2, 102.1) 12 2008-2012 * *
Brantley County 7,9 77.2 (60.7, 96.9) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -17.1 (-39.3, 13.2)
Brooks County 7,9 85.2 (68.1, 105.6) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -20.5 (-41.1, 7.3)
Bryan County 7,9 73.5 (58.7, 90.8) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.3 (-25.0, 14.6)
Bulloch County 7,9 79.6 (69.2, 91.1) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.9 (-11.2, 28.6)
Burke County 7,9 83.6 (67.8, 102.0) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-34.2, 44.0)
Butts County 7,9 101.1 (84.0, 120.7) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.7 (-8.2, 23.9)
Calhoun County 7,9 67.6 (42.3, 102.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Camden County 7,9 65.2 (54.0, 77.9) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-20.1, 22.1)
Candler County 7,9 79.2 (58.9, 104.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Carroll County 7,9 84.4 (76.5, 92.9) 86 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.4)
Catoosa County 7,9 70.4 (62.0, 79.7) 52 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.7 (-25.6, 19.4)
Charlton County 7,9 56.5 (40.2, 77.5) 8 2008-2012 * *
Chatham County 7,9 67.4 (63.1, 72.0) 185 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-15.6, 7.2)
Chattahoochee County 7,9 82.8 (46.4, 133.9) 3 2008-2012 * *
Chattooga County 7,9 98.5 (83.1, 115.9) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.2 (-9.3, 17.5)
Cherokee County 7,9 76.0 (70.1, 82.3) 133 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 4.8)
Clarke County 7,9 65.9 (58.2, 74.3) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.8 (-11.4, 24.0)
Clay County 7,9 81.2 (48.8, 131.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Clayton County 7,8 67.2 (61.5, 73.3) 117 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Clinch County 7,9 91.1 (62.9, 128.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Cobb County 7,8 59.6 (56.6, 62.7) 325 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Coffee County 7,9 84.3 (72.0, 98.0) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.9 (-19.3, 9.8)
Colquitt County 7,9 86.3 (74.9, 99.0) 42 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-23.5, 30.4)
Columbia County 7,9 62.4 (55.9, 69.5) 71 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-14.2, 7.1)
Cook County 7,9 84.3 (66.6, 105.4) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.7 (-9.0, 18.2)
Coweta County 7,9 63.3 (56.8, 70.4) 73 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-15.8, 17.9)
Crawford County 7,9 118.8 (94.0, 148.3) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.8 (-23.9, 14.2)
Crisp County 7,9 79.6 (65.3, 96.1) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.1 (-25.2, 20.5)
Dade County 7,9 90.5 (72.7, 111.6) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-25.2, 29.9)
Dawson County 7,9 66.5 (52.4, 83.4) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.6 (-26.6, 18.8)
DeKalb County 7,8 55.1 (52.3, 58.0) 310 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)
Decatur County 7,9 72.3 (59.6, 86.9) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-13.3, 10.7)
Dodge County 7,9 90.1 (73.8, 109.1) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-19.5, 15.7)
Dooly County 7,9 53.4 (38.6, 72.1) 9 2008-2012 * *
Dougherty County 7,9 76.9 (69.2, 85.3) 75 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.8 (-7.3, 18.5)
Douglas County 7,9 78.0 (70.3, 86.3) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-22.0, 16.3)
Early County 7,9 55.3 (39.1, 76.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Effingham County 7,9 89.4 (77.0, 103.3) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.0 (-15.0, 22.4)
Elbert County 7,9 80.1 (65.7, 97.0) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (-20.6, 26.0)
Emanuel County 7,9 65.6 (52.3, 81.3) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.6 (-27.0, 47.2)
Evans County 7,9 87.0 (65.2, 114.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Fannin County 7,9 69.5 (58.0, 83.1) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-18.3, 12.7)
Fayette County 7,9 49.8 (44.0, 56.1) 57 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-11.2, 7.8)
Floyd County 7,9 85.3 (77.7, 93.4) 95 2008-2012 falling falling trend -10.2 (-15.9, -4.1)
Forsyth County 7,9 64.4 (58.3, 70.9) 91 2008-2012 falling falling trend -7.1 (-13.0, -0.8)
Franklin County 7,9 88.6 (73.9, 105.6) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.0 (-16.2, 21.6)
Fulton County 7,8 56.1 (53.7, 58.6) 428 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.8, -1.0)
Gilmer County 7,9 66.2 (55.0, 79.3) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.4 (-22.2, 37.5)
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Glynn County 7,9 74.1 (66.6, 82.3) 73 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.4 (-5.7, 9.1)
Gordon County 7,9 97.8 (86.3, 110.4) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.3, 5.2)
Grady County 7,9 71.6 (58.5, 86.9) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-13.4, 11.1)
Greene County 7 65.7 (51.9, 82.8) 17 2008-2012 * *
Gwinnett County 7,8 54.1 (51.1, 57.1) 285 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.9)
Habersham County 7,9 63.5 (54.2, 74.0) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 11.1 (-2.2, 26.2)
Hall County 7,9 65.3 (59.9, 71.0) 111 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-15.0, 9.6)
Hancock County 7 53.5 (36.7, 76.3) 7 2008-2012 * *
Haralson County 7,9 103.1 (88.1, 120.0) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-14.1, 4.6)
Harris County 7,9 64.6 (53.2, 78.0) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-31.7, 37.7)
Hart County 7,9 69.6 (57.8, 83.4) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.1 (-16.0, 31.5)
Heard County 7,9 92.4 (70.5, 119.2) 13 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 7,9 60.5 (54.9, 66.5) 96 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-12.3, 13.6)
Houston County 7,9 72.6 (66.0, 79.7) 92 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-15.5, 6.1)
Irwin County 7,9 78.2 (57.5, 104.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 7,9 78.1 (68.2, 89.1) 48 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-14.3, 14.6)
Jasper County 7 64.5 (47.1, 86.3) 10 2008-2012 * *
Jeff Davis County 7,9 80.6 (62.3, 102.9) 14 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 7 78.9 (62.6, 98.4) 17 2008-2012 * *
Jenkins County 7,9 63.3 (43.2, 90.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Johnson County 7,9 67.4 (48.3, 92.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Jones County 7,9 90.1 (75.8, 106.4) 30 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.5 (-30.7, 28.9)
Lamar County 7,9 83.9 (66.9, 104.2) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-29.0, 26.0)
Lanier County 7,9 74.6 (52.5, 102.9) 8 2008-2012 * *
Laurens County 7,9 69.0 (59.7, 79.5) 40 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-20.9, 21.5)
Lee County 7,9 85.9 (68.6, 106.0) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.3 (-31.2, 22.0)
Liberty County 7,9 67.3 (55.4, 80.8) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 13.7 (-8.6, 41.4)
Lincoln County 7,9 66.1 (45.5, 93.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Long County 7,9 78.1 (55.1, 106.8) 8 2008-2012 * *
Lowndes County 7,9 68.4 (60.9, 76.5) 62 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.6 (-19.9, 4.2)
Lumpkin County 7,9 83.7 (69.6, 99.7) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.2 (-27.4, 41.0)
Macon County 7,9 81.5 (62.3, 104.9) 13 2008-2012 * *
Madison County 7,9 96.5 (81.7, 113.3) 32 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-15.1, 5.7)
Marion County 7,9 63.2 (42.2, 91.4) 6 2008-2012 * *
McDuffie County 7,9 70.6 (56.6, 87.3) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-24.2, 18.6)
McIntosh County 7,9 55.8 (41.5, 73.8) 11 2008-2012 * *
Meriwether County 7,9 69.9 (56.6, 85.7) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.0 (-42.6, 31.8)
Miller County 7,9 85.9 (59.8, 120.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Mitchell County 7,9 95.3 (79.2, 113.8) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.5 (-33.1, 11.7)
Monroe County 7,9 80.3 (66.6, 96.2) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.4 (-25.2, 37.4)
Montgomery County 7,9 84.5 (59.4, 116.7) 8 2008-2012 * *
Morgan County 7 71.2 (56.5, 88.9) 17 2008-2012 * *
Murray County 7,9 101.9 (87.6, 117.8) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.5 (-29.7, 16.3)
Muscogee County 7,9 73.7 (68.2, 79.5) 137 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-13.6, 6.9)
Newton County 7,9 77.0 (68.7, 86.1) 66 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.5 (-9.6, 27.7)
Oconee County 7,9 43.5 (33.4, 55.7) 14 2008-2012 * *
Oglethorpe County 7,9 74.9 (57.6, 96.0) 13 2008-2012 * *
Paulding County 7,9 80.4 (72.2, 89.3) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-18.7, 15.2)
Peach County 7,9 74.7 (60.7, 90.9) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 13.0 (-8.2, 39.1)
Pickens County 7,9 86.3 (73.4, 101.0) 34 2008-2012 rising rising trend 5.0 (1.3, 9.0)
Pierce County 7,9 90.8 (73.3, 111.3) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -14.0 (-37.4, 18.3)
Pike County 7,9 73.3 (56.8, 93.3) 14 2008-2012 * *
Polk County 7,9 99.4 (86.8, 113.4) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-24.6, 25.3)
Pulaski County 7,9 51.7 (36.8, 71.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 7 76.0 (62.2, 92.3) 23 2008-2012 * *
Quitman County 7,9 123.2 (77.2, 191.5) 5 2008-2012 * *
Rabun County 7,9 53.1 (41.0, 68.4) 14 2008-2012 * *
Randolph County 7,9 54.1 (36.0, 79.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Richmond County 7,9 74.7 (69.4, 80.4) 149 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-15.6, 6.0)
Rockdale County 7,9 61.8 (54.1, 70.4) 48 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.1 (-24.0, 8.7)
Schley County 7,9 55.2 (31.1, 91.8) 3 2008-2012 * *
Screven County 7,9 77.4 (59.9, 98.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Seminole County 7,9 63.3 (45.9, 86.5) 9 2008-2012 * *
Spalding County 7,9 78.8 (69.7, 88.8) 56 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-16.8, 24.8)
Stephens County 7,9 77.3 (64.5, 92.0) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.1 (-10.1, 25.1)
Stewart County 7,9 74.7 (48.0, 111.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Sumter County 7,9 61.8 (50.6, 74.8) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-27.4, 23.7)
Talbot County 7,9 74.9 (50.8, 107.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Tattnall County 7,9 107.1 (89.5, 127.1) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.8 (-4.3, 21.5)
Taylor County 7,9 45.5 (29.3, 68.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Telfair County 7,9 62.6 (47.6, 80.9) 12 2008-2012 * *
Terrell County 7,9 68.1 (48.6, 93.5) 8 2008-2012 * *
Thomas County 7,9 84.3 (73.7, 96.1) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.5 (-25.2, 21.9)
Tift County 7,9 76.6 (65.1, 89.4) 32 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-29.6, 36.1)
Toombs County 7,9 73.5 (60.4, 88.6) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-27.9, 41.8)
Towns County 7,9 61.2 (47.2, 80.0) 14 2008-2012 * *
Treutlen County 7,9 69.5 (45.7, 101.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Troup County 7,9 69.3 (60.9, 78.6) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-23.5, 21.5)
Turner County 7,9 67.3 (47.0, 93.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Twiggs County 7,9 87.6 (65.7, 115.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Union County 7,9 76.6 (64.4, 91.1) 31 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-18.9, 20.6)
Upson County 7,9 84.9 (71.6, 100.2) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-21.3, 20.2)
Walker County 7,9 88.4 (79.5, 98.0) 74 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-21.0, 19.9)
Walton County 7,9 68.5 (60.7, 76.9) 59 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-18.4, 14.0)
Ware County 7,9 65.6 (55.3, 77.4) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.5 (-14.4, 25.1)
Warren County 7 81.9 (55.8, 117.2) 7 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 7 75.5 (60.6, 93.0) 18 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7,9 78.6 (65.4, 93.7) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.1 (-26.7, 7.9)
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wheeler County 7,9 63.5 (40.6, 94.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
White County 7,9 72.9 (60.8, 86.8) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-14.7, 14.4)
Whitfield County 7,9 83.3 (75.4, 91.8) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.6 (-22.5, 7.7)
Wilcox County 7,9 72.3 (51.3, 99.7) 8 2008-2012 * *
Wilkes County 7,9 67.2 (49.7, 89.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Wilkinson County 7,9 86.4 (65.3, 113.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Worth County 7,9 64.5 (51.3, 80.3) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 12.0 (-11.7, 42.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/30/2015 12:03 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top