Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3 54.1 (53.2, 55.1) 2,751 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Fulton County 7,8 47.6 (44.6, 50.6) 207 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Cobb County 7,8 50.0 (46.4, 53.8) 155 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
DeKalb County 7,8 44.2 (41.0, 47.6) 145 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Gwinnett County 7,8 46.3 (42.7, 50.0) 139 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Chatham County 7,9 54.0 (48.9, 59.6) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-15.7, 19.7)
Muscogee County 7,9 60.1 (53.7, 67.0) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.6 (-11.1, 6.6)
Cherokee County 7,9 65.8 (58.6, 73.7) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.1, 7.4)
Richmond County 7,9 56.5 (50.4, 63.1) 63 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.1 (-20.0, 8.0)
Bibb County 7,9 56.8 (50.1, 64.0) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.2 (-3.4, 10.3)
Clayton County 7,8 54.3 (47.7, 61.6) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Hall County 7,9 54.9 (48.3, 62.1) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-19.8, 14.0)
Forsyth County 7,9 59.0 (51.3, 67.5) 45 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.9 (-13.2, -4.3)
Floyd County 7,9 69.9 (60.8, 80.0) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-10.1, 1.0)
Henry County 7,9 48.8 (42.3, 55.9) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.7 (-7.5, 11.9)
Houston County 7,9 58.3 (50.5, 66.9) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-11.4, 3.8)
Bartow County 7,9 75.2 (64.9, 86.6) 40 2008-2012 falling falling trend -10.7 (-19.4, -1.0)
Douglas County 7,9 65.2 (56.1, 75.4) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-21.0, 15.7)
Carroll County 7,9 66.4 (57.1, 76.7) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-12.7, 7.8)
Paulding County 7,9 64.7 (55.3, 75.2) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-17.7, 13.2)
Whitfield County 7,9 66.1 (56.6, 76.6) 35 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.9 (-16.0, -3.3)
Columbia County 7,9 54.1 (46.1, 63.2) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-19.6, 10.3)
Glynn County 7,9 59.8 (50.8, 69.9) 33 2008-2012 rising rising trend 13.1 (1.0, 26.7)
Walker County 7,9 70.7 (60.1, 82.7) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-25.1, 20.1)
Coweta County 7,9 52.3 (44.4, 61.2) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-22.1, 27.7)
Newton County 7,9 67.3 (57.2, 78.7) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.3 (-18.0, 40.4)
Dougherty County 7,9 51.3 (43.2, 60.5) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.8, 11.2)
Lowndes County 7,9 50.6 (42.2, 60.2) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-16.9, 8.9)
Clarke County 7,9 54.9 (45.7, 65.4) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.3 (-6.2, 16.1)
Fayette County 7,9 39.7 (32.9, 47.6) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-23.4, 17.1)
Troup County 7,9 61.6 (51.1, 73.7) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-24.0, 24.2)
Walton County 7,9 50.8 (42.0, 61.0) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.8 (-32.7, 26.2)
Gordon County 7,9 75.9 (62.6, 91.1) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-21.8, 17.8)
Catoosa County 7,9 54.9 (45.3, 66.1) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-28.5, 27.0)
Jackson County 7,9 69.0 (56.7, 83.1) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-18.5, 25.9)
Barrow County 7,9 63.1 (51.6, 76.4) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 14.2 (-21.3, 65.5)
Spalding County 7,9 54.7 (44.8, 66.3) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.4 (-11.8, 30.8)
Rockdale County 7,9 47.7 (38.9, 58.0) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.2 (-25.5, 13.3)
Bulloch County 7,9 64.6 (52.3, 78.9) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-23.2, 33.7)
Polk County 7,9 73.5 (59.1, 90.5) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-30.6, 36.4)
Effingham County 7,9 76.3 (60.9, 94.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.4 (-25.4, 54.5)
Thomas County 7,9 56.9 (45.7, 70.4) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-32.8, 30.4)
Murray County 7,9 83.2 (66.2, 103.3) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.0 (-17.6, 5.0)
Haralson County 7,9 87.9 (69.7, 109.7) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-18.5, 25.5)
Pickens County 7,9 78.1 (61.6, 98.2) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-11.0, 8.0)
Colquitt County 7,9 61.6 (48.8, 76.9) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-20.7, 15.4)
Coffee County 7,9 67.4 (52.8, 84.7) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.8 (-28.4, 18.8)
Habersham County 7,9 50.9 (39.8, 64.4) 15 2008-2012 rising rising trend 11.1 (0.8, 22.6)
Baldwin County 7,9 57.3 (44.6, 72.5) 14 2008-2012 * *
Union County 7,9 64.9 (49.8, 84.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Laurens County 7,9 40.5 (31.2, 51.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Ware County 7,9 51.7 (39.8, 66.4) 13 2008-2012 * *
Camden County 7,9 57.2 (43.5, 73.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Madison County 7,9 71.8 (55.0, 92.4) 13 2008-2012 * *
Tift County 7,9 51.8 (39.7, 66.5) 13 2008-2012 * *
Gilmer County 7,9 52.7 (39.5, 69.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Stephens County 7,9 62.9 (47.5, 82.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Fannin County 7,9 55.2 (41.1, 73.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Lumpkin County 7,9 65.6 (49.1, 86.2) 11 2008-2012 * *
Chattooga County 7,9 66.3 (49.7, 87.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Harris County 7,9 54.4 (40.7, 71.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Hart County 7,9 56.6 (42.5, 74.7) 11 2008-2012 * *
Butts County 7,9 79.0 (59.0, 103.9) 11 2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 7,9 65.5 (49.0, 86.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Liberty County 7,9 49.3 (36.2, 65.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Crisp County 7,9 68.0 (50.6, 89.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Jones County 7,9 59.3 (44.0, 78.3) 10 2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 7 61.9 (45.4, 83.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
White County 7,9 51.7 (38.2, 68.9) 10 2008-2012 * *
Franklin County 7,9 61.1 (44.9, 81.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
Upson County 7,9 49.0 (36.2, 65.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
McDuffie County 7,9 65.5 (48.0, 87.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
Lee County 7,9 76.6 (55.6, 102.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Sumter County 7,9 48.0 (35.1, 64.2) 9 2008-2012 * *
Mitchell County 7,9 62.1 (45.3, 83.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7,9 53.3 (38.8, 71.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Dade County 7,9 81.9 (59.5, 110.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Tattnall County 7,9 66.9 (48.6, 90.4) 9 2008-2012 * *
Toombs County 7,9 50.9 (36.8, 68.8) 9 2008-2012 * *
Burke County 7,9 64.8 (46.6, 87.9) 9 2008-2012 * *
Dodge County 7,9 64.2 (46.3, 87.2) 9 2008-2012 * *
Elbert County 7,9 55.5 (40.1, 75.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Decatur County 7,9 47.4 (34.0, 64.6) 8 2008-2012 * *
Grady County 7,9 52.3 (37.5, 71.3) 8 2008-2012 * *
Peach County 7,9 53.6 (38.5, 73.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Berrien County 7,9 67.4 (47.8, 92.7) 8 2008-2012 * *
Bryan County 7,9 56.9 (40.0, 78.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Meriwether County 7,9 49.5 (34.9, 68.6) 8 2008-2012 * *
Cook County 7,9 71.1 (49.8, 98.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Dawson County 7,9 59.0 (40.7, 83.1) 7 2008-2012 * *
Worth County 7,9 50.0 (35.0, 69.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Pierce County 7,9 64.2 (44.6, 89.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Rabun County 7,9 52.4 (35.8, 75.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Oconee County 7,9 37.2 (25.3, 52.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Towns County 7,9 55.9 (37.6, 84.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Lamar County 7,9 56.5 (38.4, 80.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Brantley County 7,9 55.9 (37.6, 80.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Morgan County 7 48.5 (32.8, 69.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Brooks County 7,9 52.8 (35.5, 76.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 7,9 76.7 (51.0, 111.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Emanuel County 7,9 40.8 (27.5, 58.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Pike County 7,9 60.7 (40.5, 87.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Screven County 7,9 60.3 (40.4, 87.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Washington County 7 43.3 (29.1, 62.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Appling County 7,9 52.4 (34.8, 76.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Ben Hill County 7,9 47.8 (31.9, 69.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Oglethorpe County 7,9 58.1 (38.4, 85.1) 6 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 7 42.9 (28.2, 63.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Bleckley County 7,9 59.5 (38.4, 89.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
McIntosh County 7,9 50.6 (32.3, 76.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Jeff Davis County 7,9 53.7 (34.0, 81.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Seminole County 7,9 63.9 (40.8, 98.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Bacon County 7,9 65.8 (41.5, 100.1) 5 2008-2012 * *
Banks County 7,9 45.8 (28.7, 69.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Heard County 7,9 64.7 (40.5, 98.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Macon County 7,9 54.2 (34.0, 83.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Greene County 7 28.5 (17.4, 46.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Jasper County 7 53.6 (33.2, 82.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Telfair County 7,9 42.4 (26.4, 65.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Wilkinson County 7,9 59.9 (37.5, 92.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Candler County 7,9 57.0 (35.0, 88.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Evans County 7,9 62.0 (38.1, 96.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Lanier County 7,9 77.9 (48.0, 120.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Clinch County 7,9 77.4 (45.4, 125.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Long County 7,9 59.8 (34.7, 95.3) 4 2008-2012 * *
Twiggs County 7,9 53.3 (31.3, 87.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Irwin County 7,9 54.6 (31.3, 89.8) 3 2008-2012 * *
Johnson County 7,9 49.8 (28.3, 83.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Miller County 7,9 68.9 (38.6, 116.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hancock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pulaski County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Talbot County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Taylor County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Terrell County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilcox County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilkes County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/03/2015 6:38 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top