Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3 54.1 (53.2, 55.1) 2,751 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Appling County 7,9 52.4 (34.8, 76.2) 6 2008-2012 * *
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bacon County 7,9 65.8 (41.5, 100.1) 5 2008-2012 * *
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Baldwin County 7,9 57.3 (44.6, 72.5) 14 2008-2012 * *
Banks County 7,9 45.8 (28.7, 69.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Barrow County 7,9 63.1 (51.6, 76.4) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 14.2 (-21.3, 65.5)
Bartow County 7,9 75.2 (64.9, 86.6) 40 2008-2012 falling falling trend -10.7 (-19.4, -1.0)
Ben Hill County 7,9 47.8 (31.9, 69.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Berrien County 7,9 67.4 (47.8, 92.7) 8 2008-2012 * *
Bibb County 7,9 56.8 (50.1, 64.0) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.2 (-3.4, 10.3)
Bleckley County 7,9 59.5 (38.4, 89.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Brantley County 7,9 55.9 (37.6, 80.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Brooks County 7,9 52.8 (35.5, 76.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Bryan County 7,9 56.9 (40.0, 78.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Bulloch County 7,9 64.6 (52.3, 78.9) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-23.2, 33.7)
Burke County 7,9 64.8 (46.6, 87.9) 9 2008-2012 * *
Butts County 7,9 79.0 (59.0, 103.9) 11 2008-2012 * *
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Camden County 7,9 57.2 (43.5, 73.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Candler County 7,9 57.0 (35.0, 88.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Carroll County 7,9 66.4 (57.1, 76.7) 38 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.0 (-12.7, 7.8)
Catoosa County 7,9 54.9 (45.3, 66.1) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-28.5, 27.0)
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chatham County 7,9 54.0 (48.9, 59.6) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-15.7, 19.7)
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chattooga County 7,9 66.3 (49.7, 87.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Cherokee County 7,9 65.8 (58.6, 73.7) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.1, 7.4)
Clarke County 7,9 54.9 (45.7, 65.4) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.3 (-6.2, 16.1)
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clayton County 7,8 54.3 (47.7, 61.6) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.6)
Clinch County 7,9 77.4 (45.4, 125.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Cobb County 7,8 50.0 (46.4, 53.8) 155 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.5)
Coffee County 7,9 67.4 (52.8, 84.7) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.8 (-28.4, 18.8)
Colquitt County 7,9 61.6 (48.8, 76.9) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-20.7, 15.4)
Columbia County 7,9 54.1 (46.1, 63.2) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-19.6, 10.3)
Cook County 7,9 71.1 (49.8, 98.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Coweta County 7,9 52.3 (44.4, 61.2) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-22.1, 27.7)
Crawford County 7,9 76.7 (51.0, 111.8) 6 2008-2012 * *
Crisp County 7,9 68.0 (50.6, 89.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Dade County 7,9 81.9 (59.5, 110.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Dawson County 7,9 59.0 (40.7, 83.1) 7 2008-2012 * *
DeKalb County 7,8 44.2 (41.0, 47.6) 145 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.1)
Decatur County 7,9 47.4 (34.0, 64.6) 8 2008-2012 * *
Dodge County 7,9 64.2 (46.3, 87.2) 9 2008-2012 * *
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dougherty County 7,9 51.3 (43.2, 60.5) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.0 (-0.8, 11.2)
Douglas County 7,9 65.2 (56.1, 75.4) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-21.0, 15.7)
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Effingham County 7,9 76.3 (60.9, 94.2) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.4 (-25.4, 54.5)
Elbert County 7,9 55.5 (40.1, 75.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Emanuel County 7,9 40.8 (27.5, 58.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Evans County 7,9 62.0 (38.1, 96.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Fannin County 7,9 55.2 (41.1, 73.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Fayette County 7,9 39.7 (32.9, 47.6) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-23.4, 17.1)
Floyd County 7,9 69.9 (60.8, 80.0) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-10.1, 1.0)
Forsyth County 7,9 59.0 (51.3, 67.5) 45 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.9 (-13.2, -4.3)
Franklin County 7,9 61.1 (44.9, 81.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
Fulton County 7,8 47.6 (44.6, 50.6) 207 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Gilmer County 7,9 52.7 (39.5, 69.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Glynn County 7,9 59.8 (50.8, 69.9) 33 2008-2012 rising rising trend 13.1 (1.0, 26.7)
Gordon County 7,9 75.9 (62.6, 91.1) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.0 (-21.8, 17.8)
Grady County 7,9 52.3 (37.5, 71.3) 8 2008-2012 * *
Greene County 7 28.5 (17.4, 46.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Gwinnett County 7,8 46.3 (42.7, 50.0) 139 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Habersham County 7,9 50.9 (39.8, 64.4) 15 2008-2012 rising rising trend 11.1 (0.8, 22.6)
Hall County 7,9 54.9 (48.3, 62.1) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.3 (-19.8, 14.0)
Hancock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Haralson County 7,9 87.9 (69.7, 109.7) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-18.5, 25.5)
Harris County 7,9 54.4 (40.7, 71.6) 11 2008-2012 * *
Hart County 7,9 56.6 (42.5, 74.7) 11 2008-2012 * *
Heard County 7,9 64.7 (40.5, 98.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 7,9 48.8 (42.3, 55.9) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.7 (-7.5, 11.9)
Houston County 7,9 58.3 (50.5, 66.9) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-11.4, 3.8)
Irwin County 7,9 54.6 (31.3, 89.8) 3 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 7,9 69.0 (56.7, 83.1) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-18.5, 25.9)
Jasper County 7 53.6 (33.2, 82.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Jeff Davis County 7,9 53.7 (34.0, 81.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 7 42.9 (28.2, 63.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Johnson County 7,9 49.8 (28.3, 83.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Jones County 7,9 59.3 (44.0, 78.3) 10 2008-2012 * *
Lamar County 7,9 56.5 (38.4, 80.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Lanier County 7,9 77.9 (48.0, 120.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Laurens County 7,9 40.5 (31.2, 51.8) 13 2008-2012 * *
Lee County 7,9 76.6 (55.6, 102.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Liberty County 7,9 49.3 (36.2, 65.4) 11 2008-2012 * *
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Long County 7,9 59.8 (34.7, 95.3) 4 2008-2012 * *
Lowndes County 7,9 50.6 (42.2, 60.2) 26 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-16.9, 8.9)
Lumpkin County 7,9 65.6 (49.1, 86.2) 11 2008-2012 * *
Macon County 7,9 54.2 (34.0, 83.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
Madison County 7,9 71.8 (55.0, 92.4) 13 2008-2012 * *
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McDuffie County 7,9 65.5 (48.0, 87.8) 10 2008-2012 * *
McIntosh County 7,9 50.6 (32.3, 76.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Meriwether County 7,9 49.5 (34.9, 68.6) 8 2008-2012 * *
Miller County 7,9 68.9 (38.6, 116.5) 3 2008-2012 * *
Mitchell County 7,9 62.1 (45.3, 83.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 7,9 65.5 (49.0, 86.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Morgan County 7 48.5 (32.8, 69.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Murray County 7,9 83.2 (66.2, 103.3) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.0 (-17.6, 5.0)
Muscogee County 7,9 60.1 (53.7, 67.0) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.6 (-11.1, 6.6)
Newton County 7,9 67.3 (57.2, 78.7) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.3 (-18.0, 40.4)
Oconee County 7,9 37.2 (25.3, 52.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Oglethorpe County 7,9 58.1 (38.4, 85.1) 6 2008-2012 * *
Paulding County 7,9 64.7 (55.3, 75.2) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.5 (-17.7, 13.2)
Peach County 7,9 53.6 (38.5, 73.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
Pickens County 7,9 78.1 (61.6, 98.2) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-11.0, 8.0)
Pierce County 7,9 64.2 (44.6, 89.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Pike County 7,9 60.7 (40.5, 87.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Polk County 7,9 73.5 (59.1, 90.5) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-30.6, 36.4)
Pulaski County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 7 61.9 (45.4, 83.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Rabun County 7,9 52.4 (35.8, 75.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Richmond County 7,9 56.5 (50.4, 63.1) 63 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.1 (-20.0, 8.0)
Rockdale County 7,9 47.7 (38.9, 58.0) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.2 (-25.5, 13.3)
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Screven County 7,9 60.3 (40.4, 87.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Seminole County 7,9 63.9 (40.8, 98.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Spalding County 7,9 54.7 (44.8, 66.3) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.4 (-11.8, 30.8)
Stephens County 7,9 62.9 (47.5, 82.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sumter County 7,9 48.0 (35.1, 64.2) 9 2008-2012 * *
Talbot County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Tattnall County 7,9 66.9 (48.6, 90.4) 9 2008-2012 * *
Taylor County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Telfair County 7,9 42.4 (26.4, 65.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Terrell County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Thomas County 7,9 56.9 (45.7, 70.4) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-32.8, 30.4)
Tift County 7,9 51.8 (39.7, 66.5) 13 2008-2012 * *
Toombs County 7,9 50.9 (36.8, 68.8) 9 2008-2012 * *
Towns County 7,9 55.9 (37.6, 84.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Troup County 7,9 61.6 (51.1, 73.7) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-24.0, 24.2)
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Twiggs County 7,9 53.3 (31.3, 87.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Union County 7,9 64.9 (49.8, 84.8) 14 2008-2012 * *
Upson County 7,9 49.0 (36.2, 65.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Walker County 7,9 70.7 (60.1, 82.7) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-25.1, 20.1)
Walton County 7,9 50.8 (42.0, 61.0) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.8 (-32.7, 26.2)
Ware County 7,9 51.7 (39.8, 66.4) 13 2008-2012 * *
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Washington County 7 43.3 (29.1, 62.7) 6 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7,9 53.3 (38.8, 71.6) 9 2008-2012 * *
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
White County 7,9 51.7 (38.2, 68.9) 10 2008-2012 * *
Whitfield County 7,9 66.1 (56.6, 76.6) 35 2008-2012 falling falling trend -9.9 (-16.0, -3.3)
Wilcox County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilkes County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilkinson County 7,9 59.9 (37.5, 92.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Worth County 7,9 50.0 (35.0, 69.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2015 8:37 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top