Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Breast, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3 123.5 (122.1, 124.9) 6,404 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 123.0 (122.8, 123.2) 220,205 § 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.8)
Pulaski County 7,9 60.6 (39.8, 89.8) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Telfair County 7,9 70.4 (48.2, 100.3) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Dooly County 7,9 70.9 (46.7, 103.7) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Brantley County 7,9 71.0 (49.4, 99.1) 7 2008-2012
*
*
McIntosh County 7,9 76.8 (55.0, 105.8) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Long County 7,9 79.3 (50.1, 118.7) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Charlton County 7,9 79.6 (52.2, 117.2) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Banks County 7,9 80.0 (56.7, 109.8) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Bacon County 7,9 82.9 (54.6, 121.4) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Talbot County 7,9 83.4 (50.9, 132.0) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Hancock County 7 84.5 (52.0, 131.2) 5 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Gilmer County 7,9 87.6 (68.8, 110.4) 17 2008-2012 rising rising trend 15.7 (5.8, 26.4)
Liberty County 7,9 89.9 (73.2, 109.2) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.0 (-4.7, 13.4)
Dade County 7,9 91.7 (66.3, 124.1) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Irwin County 7,9 92.1 (60.3, 135.8) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Heard County 7,9 93.0 (63.2, 132.6) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Crisp County 7,9 93.1 (71.9, 118.9) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Jenkins County 7,9 93.2 (60.6, 138.3) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Coffee County 7,9 93.4 (75.9, 113.7) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.7 (-3.9, 12.0)
Whitfield County 7,9 93.7 (82.3, 106.2) 49 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.9 (-12.1, 20.5)
Pickens County 7,9 94.4 (75.4, 117.1) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.0 (-7.9, 15.3)
Jeff Davis County 7,9 96.3 (68.9, 131.4) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Lincoln County 7,9 96.7 (63.1, 144.1) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Chattooga County 7,9 98.2 (76.7, 124.2) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.0 (-31.7, 10.7)
Johnson County 7,9 98.4 (63.8, 146.1) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Barrow County 7,9 99.5 (84.9, 115.8) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.2 (-11.7, 13.7)
Baldwin County 7,9 99.6 (82.5, 119.3) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.2 (-19.6, 11.9)
Candler County 7,9 100.2 (68.6, 141.9) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Brooks County 7,9 100.2 (73.5, 133.9) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Monroe County 7,9 101.0 (80.5, 125.5) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.5 (-20.3, 50.4)
Berrien County 7,9 101.1 (76.6, 131.3) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Lanier County 7,9 101.5 (65.9, 149.6) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Grady County 7,9 101.8 (79.5, 128.4) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.5 (-15.7, 34.5)
Catoosa County 7,9 102.0 (88.2, 117.4) 40 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.3 (-35.2, 16.1)
Bleckley County 7,9 102.0 (71.7, 141.2) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Walker County 7,9 102.6 (89.3, 117.5) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.6 (-17.1, 32.0)
Pierce County 7,9 102.8 (77.5, 134.1) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Stephens County 7,9 103.0 (82.6, 127.4) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.8 (-25.7, 50.8)
Early County 7,9 103.1 (71.2, 145.0) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Decatur County 7,9 103.4 (82.4, 128.4) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.4 (-27.1, 12.7)
Meriwether County 7,9 103.5 (80.2, 131.8) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 13.2 (-11.2, 44.2)
Marion County 7,9 103.7 (65.0, 157.1) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Elbert County 7,9 104.6 (80.2, 134.4) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Treutlen County 7,9 106.0 (64.4, 164.9) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Worth County 7,9 106.0 (82.2, 134.7) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Butts County 7,9 106.6 (82.6, 135.8) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Putnam County 7 108.1 (84.3, 137.0) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Randolph County 7,9 108.1 (71.3, 158.9) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Murray County 7,9 108.5 (89.2, 130.8) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.8 (-44.8, 34.5)
Hart County 7,9 108.7 (87.2, 134.3) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-18.0, 17.3)
Camden County 7,9 109.0 (89.9, 130.8) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.6 (-14.7, 23.3)
Upson County 7,9 110.2 (88.8, 135.5) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.6 (-26.8, 24.2)
Miller County 7,9 110.3 (69.7, 168.2) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Taylor County 7,9 110.4 (73.5, 160.1) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Franklin County 7,9 111.2 (87.8, 139.3) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.3 (-7.8, 24.9)
Harris County 7,9 111.2 (91.0, 134.8) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.7 (-40.8, 71.4)
Wilcox County 7,9 112.0 (73.0, 165.9) 6 2008-2012
*
*
Colquitt County 7,9 112.8 (94.6, 133.5) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -11.9 (-23.0, 0.9)
Houston County 7,9 112.9 (102.2, 124.4) 83 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.0 (-14.5, 14.6)
Dodge County 7,9 112.9 (87.4, 143.9) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Toombs County 7,9 113.9 (91.6, 140.2) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-24.9, 19.2)
Laurens County 7,9 114.3 (97.4, 133.4) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-18.0, 23.8)
Haralson County 7,9 114.8 (92.9, 140.4) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -14.9 (-32.1, 6.6)
Washington County 7 115.1 (89.3, 146.3) 14 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Pike County 7,9 115.2 (86.7, 150.4) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Thomas County 7,9 115.3 (98.1, 134.7) 34 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.9, 7.8)
Calhoun County 7,9 115.3 (67.3, 185.5) 4 2008-2012
*
*
Fannin County 7,9 115.8 (92.1, 144.2) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.7 (-16.5, 31.4)
Bulloch County 7,9 116.1 (99.3, 135.0) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-14.2, 7.2)
Walton County 7,9 116.2 (102.6, 131.0) 55 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.2 (-8.6, 0.3)
Ben Hill County 7,9 116.3 (88.3, 150.5) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Burke County 7,9 116.3 (91.3, 146.2) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 10.0 (-8.1, 31.8)
Habersham County 7,9 116.7 (99.1, 136.6) 32 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.1 (-18.4, 8.0)
Macon County 7,9 116.8 (84.9, 157.3) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Coweta County 7,9 118.0 (106.5, 130.4) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.9, 2.7)
Hall County 7,9 118.1 (108.4, 128.5) 111 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-11.6, 2.3)
Paulding County 7,9 118.2 (106.4, 131.0) 78 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-11.9, 10.1)
Gordon County 7,9 118.4 (101.3, 137.5) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.4 (-31.4, 17.1)
Ware County 7,9 118.5 (98.9, 140.9) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.1 (-26.3, 27.3)
Wayne County 7,9 118.6 (96.1, 144.9) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-16.7, 15.1)
Polk County 7,9 118.6 (99.7, 140.3) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.1 (-21.0, 23.6)
Atkinson County 7,9 118.7 (76.0, 176.8) 5 2008-2012
*
*
Lee County 7,9 119.1 (94.3, 148.4) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-25.3, 34.1)
Carroll County 7,9 119.2 (106.7, 132.7) 68 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.6 (-15.1, 9.5)
Lowndes County 7,9 119.2 (106.2, 133.4) 62 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-12.9, 15.8)
Wilkinson County 7,9 119.4 (83.2, 166.9) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Newton County 7,9 119.7 (106.6, 133.9) 63 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.4 (-9.0, 15.3)
Bryan County 7,9 119.7 (95.8, 147.8) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.6 (-20.9, 1.0)
Jones County 7,9 119.7 (97.3, 146.0) 21 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.6 (-6.2, 16.6)
Glynn County 7,9 119.8 (106.4, 134.5) 61 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-15.2, 19.8)
Bartow County 7,9 119.9 (106.8, 134.2) 63 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.5 (-2.4, 11.7)
Spalding County 7,9 120.3 (105.0, 137.3) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.2 (-17.4, 23.8)
Dougherty County 7,9 120.6 (107.5, 134.9) 64 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-9.9, 7.3)
Columbia County 7,9 120.9 (109.2, 133.6) 81 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.6 (-17.5, 22.9)
Douglas County 7,9 121.3 (109.3, 134.3) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-17.1, 11.0)
Tift County 7,9 122.1 (102.4, 144.5) 28 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.5 (-20.6, 35.0)
Screven County 7,9 122.1 (92.4, 159.1) 12 2008-2012
*
*
Floyd County 7,9 122.5 (109.8, 136.2) 71 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.6 (-23.1, 13.5)
Dawson County 7,9 123.5 (97.7, 154.5) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.7 (-27.8, 15.4)
McDuffie County 7,9 123.8 (98.3, 154.2) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-15.8, 9.7)
Union County 7,9 124.1 (100.3, 153.0) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend 17.2 (-3.7, 42.6)
Tattnall County 7,9 124.5 (97.8, 156.5) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.5 (-15.2, 23.9)
Clayton County 7,8 124.5 (115.3, 134.3) 150 2008-2012 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.1, 1.6)
Oglethorpe County 7,9 124.8 (93.4, 163.8) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Evans County 7,9 125.0 (88.2, 172.0) 8 2008-2012
*
*
White County 7,9 125.5 (103.3, 151.5) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-21.8, 24.2)
Chatham County 7,9 125.9 (117.9, 134.4) 190 2008-2012 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.8, 11.0)
Twiggs County 7,9 126.5 (88.3, 177.0) 8 2008-2012
*
*
Appling County 7,9 126.5 (96.9, 162.5) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Cherokee County 7,9 126.8 (117.3, 136.9) 140 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.7 (-19.4, 20.1)
Henry County 7,9 127.7 (117.7, 138.3) 129 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.7 (-7.3, 15.9)
Effingham County 7,9 127.7 (108.2, 149.8) 32 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-11.1, 10.4)
Bibb County 7,9 128.6 (118.2, 139.6) 118 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.7 (-10.2, 1.1)
Rockdale County 7,9 128.8 (114.6, 144.4) 62 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-12.7, 10.1)
Morgan County 7 128.9 (100.7, 163.0) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Forsyth County 7,9 129.1 (118.6, 140.3) 117 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.1 (-7.3, 10.3)
Gwinnett County 7,8 129.4 (124.0, 135.0) 477 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.1, 0.8)
Emanuel County 7,9 129.9 (103.8, 160.8) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.5 (-30.4, 36.7)
Seminole County 7,9 130.6 (93.5, 179.2) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Richmond County 7,9 130.9 (121.3, 141.0) 143 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.6, 4.4)
Troup County 7,9 131.2 (115.4, 148.7) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-14.6, 12.0)
Lamar County 7,9 132.3 (102.5, 168.5) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Cobb County 7,8 132.4 (126.9, 138.0) 470 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.7, 3.8)
Jackson County 7,9 132.4 (115.2, 151.5) 44 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.0 (-14.6, 19.5)
Jefferson County 7 133.0 (103.2, 169.1) 14 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Madison County 7,9 133.0 (108.8, 161.2) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.8 (-13.6, 2.6)
Rabun County 7,9 133.4 (105.0, 168.1) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-24.8, 27.9)
Lumpkin County 7,9 133.8 (109.4, 162.2) 23 2008-2012 stable stable trend -7.1 (-20.8, 9.0)
Peach County 7,9 134.5 (108.9, 164.3) 20 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.3 (-27.6, 23.9)
Fulton County 7,8 135.0 (130.2, 139.9) 628 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.2, 0.4)
DeKalb County 7,8 135.0 (129.6, 140.6) 485 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.0 (-0.4, 0.3)
Crawford County 7,9 135.8 (100.3, 180.5) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Towns County 7,9 136.8 (101.6, 182.9) 13 2008-2012
*
*
Montgomery County 7,9 138.1 (94.3, 195.6) 7 2008-2012
*
*
Clarke County 7,9 138.6 (123.5, 155.0) 64 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.8 (-14.9, 24.2)
Sumter County 7,9 142.7 (118.4, 170.5) 25 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.0 (-12.7, 3.3)
Oconee County 7,9 143.7 (120.0, 170.9) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend 6.8 (-5.9, 21.2)
Fayette County 7,9 144.2 (131.0, 158.4) 95 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.3 (-14.9, 25.5)
Cook County 7,9 144.8 (112.0, 184.3) 14 2008-2012
*
*
Muscogee County 7,9 145.2 (135.0, 156.0) 154 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.6 (-2.1, 5.4)
Mitchell County 7,9 146.1 (117.1, 180.2) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-21.5, 19.2)
Wilkes County 7,9 147.0 (108.1, 196.3) 11 2008-2012
*
*
Greene County 7 150.5 (118.1, 189.9) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Jasper County 7 152.7 (116.4, 197.3) 12 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Turner County 7,9 152.9 (110.1, 208.0) 9 2008-2012
*
*
Terrell County 7,9 161.9 (117.6, 218.0) 10 2008-2012
*
*
Warren County 7 168.7 (113.5, 242.7) 7 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Glascock County 7 174.1 (101.7, 282.1) 4 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Clinch County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/02/2015 7:48 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top