Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Georgia by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Georgia 3 12.0 (11.6, 12.5) 614 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.8 (11.8, 11.9) 21,341 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Columbia County 7,9 7.0 (4.4, 10.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Rockdale County 7,9 8.2 (4.9, 12.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Chatham County 7,9 8.4 (6.4, 10.9) 12 2008-2012 * *
Paulding County 7,9 8.4 (5.4, 12.4) 5 2008-2012 * *
Glynn County 7,9 8.8 (5.7, 13.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Lowndes County 7,9 9.3 (6.0, 13.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Richmond County 7,9 9.4 (7.0, 12.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Clarke County 7,9 9.5 (6.0, 14.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Newton County 7,9 9.6 (6.2, 14.1) 5 2008-2012 * *
Whitfield County 7,9 9.8 (6.3, 14.5) 5 2008-2012 * *
Coweta County 7,9 10.4 (7.1, 14.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Walker County 7,9 10.5 (6.5, 16.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Cobb County 7,8 11.0 (9.4, 12.8) 37 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
Muscogee County 7,9 11.3 (8.6, 14.6) 12 2008-2012 * *
Gwinnett County 7,8 11.4 (9.8, 13.2) 40 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Laurens County 7,9 11.5 (6.6, 18.7) 3 2008-2012 * *
Bulloch County 7,9 11.6 (6.8, 18.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Douglas County 7,9 11.6 (8.0, 16.1) 7 2008-2012 * *
Troup County 7,9 11.8 (7.5, 17.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Forsyth County 7,9 12.1 (9.0, 16.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Bibb County 7,9 12.2 (9.2, 16.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Walton County 7,9 12.4 (8.3, 17.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Houston County 7,9 12.5 (9.2, 16.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Cherokee County 7,9 12.5 (9.6, 16.0) 13 2008-2012 * *
Gordon County 7,9 12.6 (7.4, 20.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Hall County 7,9 12.7 (9.7, 16.4) 12 2008-2012 * *
Clayton County 7,8 12.8 (9.8, 16.4) 14 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.9, 1.9)
Bartow County 7,9 12.9 (8.8, 18.2) 7 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 7,9 13.4 (10.2, 17.3) 13 2008-2012 * *
Fulton County 7,8 13.7 (12.2, 15.4) 62 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Barrow County 7,9 13.8 (8.7, 20.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Ware County 7,9 14.0 (8.0, 23.2) 3 2008-2012 * *
DeKalb County 7,8 14.1 (12.3, 16.0) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Spalding County 7,9 14.2 (9.3, 20.9) 5 2008-2012 * *
Carroll County 7,9 14.3 (10.2, 19.5) 8 2008-2012 * *
Dougherty County 7,9 14.4 (10.2, 19.8) 8 2008-2012 * *
Murray County 7,9 14.8 (8.3, 24.4) 3 2008-2012 * *
Floyd County 7,9 14.8 (10.6, 20.1) 9 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 7,9 14.8 (9.5, 22.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Colquitt County 7,9 15.1 (9.0, 23.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Thomas County 7,9 15.4 (9.5, 23.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Habersham County 7,9 15.8 (9.6, 24.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Fayette County 7,9 15.9 (11.5, 21.5) 10 2008-2012 * *
Tift County 7,9 16.3 (9.5, 26.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Union County 7,9 18.5 (10.9, 31.3) 4 2008-2012 * *
Fannin County 7,9 19.7 (11.2, 33.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Pickens County 7,9 19.8 (11.8, 31.6) 4 2008-2012 * *
Grady County 7,9 20.8 (11.8, 34.4) 3 2008-2012 * *
Lee County 7,9 24.9 (14.1, 40.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Towns County 7,9 40.2 (21.4, 71.6) 4 2008-2012 * *
Appling County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Atkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bacon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Baker County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Baldwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Banks County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ben Hill County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Berrien County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bleckley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Brantley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Brooks County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Bryan County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Burke County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Butts County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Calhoun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Camden County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Candler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Catoosa County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Charlton County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chattahoochee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Chattooga County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clay County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clinch County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Coffee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cook County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Crisp County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dade County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dawson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Decatur County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dodge County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dooly County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Early County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Echols County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Effingham County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Elbert County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Emanuel County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Evans County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Franklin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Gilmer County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Glascock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Greene County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hancock County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Haralson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Harris County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Heard County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Irwin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jasper County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jeff Davis County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jenkins County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Johnson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jones County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lamar County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lanier County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Liberty County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lincoln County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Long County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lumpkin County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Macon County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Madison County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Marion County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McDuffie County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
McIntosh County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Meriwether County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Miller County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Mitchell County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Morgan County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oconee County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Oglethorpe County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Peach County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pierce County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pike County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Polk County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pulaski County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Quitman County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Rabun County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Randolph County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Schley County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Screven County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Seminole County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Stephens County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Stewart County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sumter County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Talbot County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Taliaferro County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Tattnall County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Taylor County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Telfair County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Terrell County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Toombs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Treutlen County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Turner County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Twiggs County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Upson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Warren County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Washington County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Webster County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wheeler County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
White County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilcox County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilkes County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wilkinson County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Worth County 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/04/2015 1:52 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top