## Interpretation of Incidence Rates Data

#### Incidence Rate Report for Idaho by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages

Sorted by Rate

**Explanation of Column Headers**

**Incidence Rate (95% Confidence Interval)**- The incidence rate is based upon 100,000 people and is an annual rate (or average annual rate) based on the time period indicated. Rates are age-adjusted by 5-year age groups to the 2000 U.S. standard million population.

**Recent Trends** - This is an interpretation of the AAPC/APC:

**Rising**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is above 0.**Stable**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC includes 0.**Falling**when 95% confidence interval of AAPC/APC is below 0.

**AAPC/APC (95% Confidence Interval)** - the change in rate over time

- Average Annual Percent Change - AAPCs are based upon APCs that were calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program
- Annual Percent Change - APCs calculated in SEER*Stat.

**Other Notes**

**Line by Line Interpretation of the Report**

**Idaho**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 453.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 448.6 to 458.2 and 7,138 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.6 to -0.8.

**US (SEER+NPCR)**^{1,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 459.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 459.4 to 460.1 and 1,514,446 § average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -1.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.5 to -1.1.

**Lewis County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 560.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 476.6 to 657.2 and 34 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -11.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -16.1 to -7.6.

**Boise County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 529.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 456.2 to 611.7 and 47 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -22.3 to 28.3.

**Gem County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 528.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 485.4 to 574.3 and 119 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -11.4 to 15.5.

**Elmore County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 513.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 472.0 to 557.8 and 116 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.8 to 8.2.

**Benewah County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 511.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 455.9 to 572.1 and 66 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -17.2 to 12.0.

**Shoshone County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 509.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 463.0 to 559.4 and 95 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.8 to 9.6.

**Gooding County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 496.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 450.1 to 546.2 and 86 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -15.6 to 9.6.

**Washington County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 481.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 430.6 to 537.5 and 71 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.5 to 13.8.

**Ada County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 477.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 467.3 to 488.0 and 1,718 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.3 to 0.1.

**Twin Falls County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 476.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 455.6 to 498.4 and 397 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -6.9 to 0.0.

**Kootenai County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 475.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 460.2 to 491.3 and 752 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.7 to 1.7.

**Nez Perce County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 475.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 448.6 to 503.6 and 247 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -4.1 to 2.5.

**Jerome County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 475.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 433.1 to 520.4 and 95 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -11.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -15.9 to -6.9.

**Payette County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 469.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 432.6 to 509.2 and 122 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.0 to 15.9.

**Bonner County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 466.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 440.1 to 494.3 and 255 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -7.4 to 5.8.

**Canyon County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 465.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 451.1 to 481.0 and 777 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -3.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.9 to -1.8.

**Clearwater County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 462.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 410.3 to 520.2 and 64 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -9.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -26.0 to 11.0.

**Clark County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 461.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 279.5 to 715.0 and 4 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -18.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -48.5 to 30.4.

**Lincoln County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 455.4 with a 95% confidence interval from 372.9 to 550.4 and 22 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.2 to 8.3.

**Custer County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 450.0 with a 95% confidence interval from 375.0 to 537.5 and 28 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -17.4 to 26.9.

**Owyhee County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 447.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 394.9 to 504.3 and 55 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -2.8 with a 95% confidence interval from -12.6 to 8.0.

**Bingham County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 433.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 405.4 to 462.5 and 184 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.6 to 3.5.

**Camas County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 431.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 274.6 to 647.0 and 6 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -7.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -29.4 to 22.5.

**Bonneville County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 426.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 408.2 to 446.1 and 405 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.7 to 4.1.

**Boundary County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 425.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 376.8 to 478.8 and 60 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -10.5 with a 95% confidence interval from -23.7 to 4.8.

**Adams County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 424.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 346.8 to 516.8 and 25 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 6.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -18.2 to 39.2.

**Lemhi County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 412.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 361.8 to 470.3 and 53 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 4.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.1 to 19.7.

**Caribou County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 410.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 348.8 to 480.4 and 33 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 4.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -13.7 to 25.6.

**Valley County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 409.9 with a 95% confidence interval from 357.3 to 468.5 and 51 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -25.7 to 40.7.

**Minidoka County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 403.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 366.2 to 442.8 and 91 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -5.7 to 4.0.

**Latah County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 399.3 with a 95% confidence interval from 368.6 to 431.9 and 132 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -0.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.8 to 10.0.

**Jefferson County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 393.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 356.3 to 433.9 and 84 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 2.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -0.9 to 5.3.

**Fremont County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 393.1 with a 95% confidence interval from 346.4 to 444.4 and 53 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 5.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -2.1 to 12.8.

**Madison County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 389.6 with a 95% confidence interval from 349.4 to 433.0 and 74 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.1 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.0 to 12.3.

**Teton County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 384.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 316.9 to 461.2 and 26 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 3.6 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.7 to 25.9.

**Blaine County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 381.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 344.2 to 422.3 and 87 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -5.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -20.1 to 12.6.

**Power County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 381.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 321.4 to 449.6 and 30 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 7.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -10.0 to 27.2.

**Bannock County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 376.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 357.1 to 396.9 and 288 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.3 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.3 to 6.2.

**Idaho County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 368.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 334.2 to 406.6 and 92 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 1.7 with a 95% confidence interval from -3.9 to 7.6.

**Oneida County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 364.8 with a 95% confidence interval from 293.3 to 449.4 and 19 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -3.2 with a 95% confidence interval from -14.7 to 10.0.

**Cassia County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 351.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 317.5 to 388.0 and 80 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.9 with a 95% confidence interval from -8.9 to 5.6.

**Franklin County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 347.7 with a 95% confidence interval from 301.8 to 398.4 and 42 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is -1.0 with a 95% confidence interval from -16.0 to 16.8.

**Butte County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 345.5 with a 95% confidence interval from 260.7 to 450.5 and 12 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is stable because the trend is 5.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -12.8 to 27.3.

**Bear Lake County**^{6,10}- Rate : The incidence rate is 330.2 with a 95% confidence interval from 275.6 to 393.4 and 27 average annual cases over 2007-2011.
- Recent Trend : The trend is falling because the trend is -6.4 with a 95% confidence interval from -9.3 to -3.4.

**Notes:**

Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/27/2015 3:08 am.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.

‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.

^{1}Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.

^{6}Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.

^{10}Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.