Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Illinois 6,10 46.8 (46.3, 47.4) 6,364 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Adams County 6,10 48.5 (42.1, 55.8) 43 stable stable trend -7.7 (-22.4, 9.8)
Alexander County 6,10 36.3 (22.1, 57.1) 4
*
*
Bond County 6,10 59.2 (45.4, 76.1) 13
*
*
Boone County 6,10 47.7 (39.6, 56.9) 25 stable stable trend -10.9 (-24.6, 5.3)
Brown County 6,10 53.6 (32.2, 84.5) 4
*
*
Bureau County 6,10 51.4 (42.4, 61.9) 24 stable stable trend -3.5 (-15.7, 10.4)
Calhoun County 6,10 75.4 (48.5, 113.2) 5
*
*
Carroll County 6,10 50.0 (37.5, 66.0) 12
*
*
Cass County 6,10 53.9 (39.3, 72.4) 9
*
*
Champaign County 6,10 36.5 (32.5, 40.8) 62 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.1, -2.5)
Christian County 6,10 56.4 (47.1, 67.1) 27 stable stable trend -2.0 (-17.6, 16.6)
Clark County 6,10 55.3 (41.9, 71.9) 12
*
*
Clay County 6,10 46.4 (33.7, 62.8) 9
*
*
Clinton County 6,10 53.5 (44.3, 64.2) 24 stable stable trend -11.6 (-41.8, 34.2)
Coles County 6,10 45.2 (37.7, 53.9) 27 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.5, 8.3)
Cook County 6,10 48.4 (47.6, 49.3) 2,564 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.2, 1.7)
Crawford County 6,10 58.9 (46.2, 74.1) 15 stable stable trend -23.2 (-45.2, 7.5)
Cumberland County 6,10 58.0 (41.0, 80.1) 8
*
*
De Witt County 6,10 59.5 (45.4, 77.0) 12
*
*
DeKalb County 6,10 44.0 (38.1, 50.7) 40 stable stable trend -3.9 (-19.4, 14.5)
Douglas County 6,10 44.8 (33.7, 58.6) 11
*
*
DuPage County 6,10 39.6 (37.8, 41.5) 375 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Edgar County 6,10 51.7 (39.6, 66.6) 13
*
*
Edwards County 6,10 42.3 (25.9, 66.8) 4
*
*
Effingham County 6,10 54.5 (44.8, 65.8) 22 stable stable trend 7.1 (-4.5, 20.1)
Fayette County 6,10 50.1 (38.9, 63.8) 14
*
*
Ford County 6,10 48.4 (35.6, 64.8) 10
*
*
Franklin County 6,10 44.7 (36.8, 53.8) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-21.8, 30.9)
Fulton County 6,10 53.7 (44.8, 64.0) 27 stable stable trend -8.4 (-24.8, 11.7)
Gallatin County 6,10 63.0 (41.7, 93.4) 6
*
*
Greene County 6,10 66.9 (50.9, 86.7) 12
*
*
Grundy County 6,10 54.0 (45.0, 64.3) 26 stable stable trend -1.3 (-16.4, 16.6)
Hamilton County 6,10 74.7 (53.7, 102.1) 9
*
*
Hancock County 6,10 51.9 (40.7, 65.6) 15 stable stable trend -26.5 (-63.5, 47.9)
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henderson County 6,10 54.1 (37.2, 78.2) 7
*
*
Henry County 6,10 48.2 (40.9, 56.5) 32 stable stable trend -3.9 (-19.6, 14.7)
Iroquois County 6,10 58.1 (48.0, 70.0) 25 stable stable trend 4.9 (-1.0, 11.2)
Jackson County 6,10 49.2 (41.2, 58.4) 27 stable stable trend -11.5 (-23.5, 2.4)
Jasper County 6,10 48.9 (33.2, 70.1) 6
*
*
Jefferson County 6,10 50.9 (42.3, 60.8) 26 stable stable trend -0.4 (-15.6, 17.5)
Jersey County 6,10 32.2 (23.5, 43.1) 9
*
*
Jo Daviess County 6,10 42.9 (33.5, 54.4) 15 stable stable trend -3.9 (-26.5, 25.6)
Johnson County 6,10 55.7 (40.5, 75.4) 9
*
*
Kane County 6,10 39.8 (37.2, 42.6) 179 stable stable trend -6.0 (-13.1, 1.7)
Kankakee County 6,10 48.6 (43.2, 54.5) 61 stable stable trend -4.4 (-15.2, 7.9)
Kendall County 6,10 46.5 (39.8, 53.9) 39 stable stable trend -3.9 (-16.1, 10.0)
Knox County 6,10 47.1 (40.2, 54.9) 35 falling falling trend -10.7 (-17.8, -3.1)
La Salle County 6,10 47.9 (43.0, 53.3) 71 stable stable trend -0.9 (-14.8, 15.2)
Lake County 6,10 40.9 (38.7, 43.2) 272 stable stable trend -0.0 (-10.1, 11.1)
Lawrence County 6,10 51.6 (38.8, 67.6) 11
*
*
Lee County 6,10 50.7 (41.8, 61.0) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-28.3, 35.4)
Livingston County 6,10 44.1 (36.2, 53.4) 22 stable stable trend -2.2 (-27.7, 32.3)
Logan County 6,10 65.7 (54.6, 78.6) 25 stable stable trend -7.8 (-19.4, 5.5)
Macon County 6,10 50.9 (45.7, 56.7) 72 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.6, 6.9)
Macoupin County 6,10 53.9 (46.0, 62.8) 35 stable stable trend 2.8 (-8.4, 15.5)
Madison County 6,10 46.8 (43.5, 50.4) 148 stable stable trend -8.0 (-22.3, 8.9)
Marion County 6,10 47.9 (39.7, 57.4) 25 stable stable trend 0.9 (-18.3, 24.7)
Marshall County 6,10 45.2 (32.6, 61.7) 9
*
*
Mason County 6,10 57.5 (43.6, 74.9) 12
*
*
Massac County 6,10 52.9 (40.0, 69.2) 12
*
*
McDonough County 6,10 51.9 (41.3, 64.5) 18 stable stable trend -0.9 (-22.9, 27.4)
McHenry County 6,10 44.6 (41.1, 48.4) 126 stable stable trend -1.9 (-8.0, 4.6)
McLean County 6,10 42.5 (37.9, 47.5) 64 stable stable trend 1.7 (-11.7, 17.0)
Menard County 6,10 50.7 (36.1, 69.7) 8
*
*
Mercer County 6,10 44.8 (33.4, 59.4) 11
*
*
Monroe County 6,10 44.9 (36.0, 55.5) 18 stable stable trend -8.0 (-27.1, 16.3)
Montgomery County 6,10 54.5 (44.7, 65.9) 22 stable stable trend -8.1 (-42.8, 47.8)
Morgan County 6,10 48.0 (39.1, 58.5) 22 stable stable trend 6.3 (-17.4, 36.8)
Moultrie County 6,10 39.9 (28.6, 54.6) 9
*
*
Ogle County 6,10 45.3 (38.2, 53.4) 29 stable stable trend -11.2 (-31.3, 14.8)
Peoria County 6,10 48.2 (44.1, 52.7) 102 stable stable trend -3.6 (-9.8, 3.1)
Perry County 6,10 52.5 (41.1, 66.4) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-24.6, 29.4)
Piatt County 6,10 26.7 (17.9, 38.8) 6
*
*
Pike County 6,10 61.1 (47.0, 78.5) 14
*
*
Pope County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pulaski County 6,10 47.9 (29.5, 75.2) 4
*
*
Putnam County 6,10 47.3 (29.1, 74.7) 4
*
*
Randolph County 6,10 55.4 (45.7, 66.8) 23 stable stable trend 3.3 (-19.7, 33.0)
Richland County 6,10 53.7 (41.2, 69.2) 13
*
*
Rock Island County 6,10 46.6 (42.2, 51.3) 87 stable stable trend -7.0 (-15.0, 1.8)
Saline County 6,10 62.6 (51.1, 76.2) 21 stable stable trend 2.5 (-4.4, 9.8)
Sangamon County 6,10 48.6 (44.6, 52.9) 110 stable stable trend -4.3 (-17.1, 10.5)
Schuyler County 6,10 50.4 (32.4, 75.6) 5
*
*
Scott County 6,10 66.2 (41.3, 101.7) 5
*
*
Shelby County 6,10 46.2 (36.1, 58.6) 15 stable stable trend 7.9 (-18.2, 42.2)
St. Clair County 6,10 47.5 (43.9, 51.2) 137 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.1, 3.6)
Stark County 6,10 67.0 (42.8, 101.0) 5
*
*
Stephenson County 6,10 42.5 (35.8, 50.3) 30 stable stable trend -1.8 (-32.8, 43.3)
Tazewell County 6,10 48.1 (43.5, 53.1) 81 stable stable trend 2.6 (-6.7, 12.8)
Union County 6,10 42.5 (31.9, 56.0) 11
*
*
Vermilion County 6,10 50.9 (44.8, 57.6) 53 stable stable trend 2.7 (-10.2, 17.3)
Wabash County 6,10 62.7 (46.5, 83.3) 10
*
*
Warren County 6,10 46.6 (34.8, 61.4) 11
*
*
Washington County 6,10 65.5 (50.2, 84.5) 13
*
*
Wayne County 6,10 40.7 (30.2, 54.3) 10
*
*
White County 6,10 41.7 (30.7, 55.9) 10
*
*
Whiteside County 6,10 45.1 (38.7, 52.5) 36 stable stable trend -14.4 (-36.1, 14.7)
Will County 6,10 46.5 (44.0, 49.1) 268 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.8, -2.0)
Williamson County 6,10 52.6 (45.8, 60.2) 44 stable stable trend -2.9 (-22.3, 21.3)
Winnebago County 6,10 45.6 (42.3, 49.0) 152 stable stable trend -3.1 (-11.0, 5.5)
Woodford County 6,10 46.8 (38.2, 56.7) 22 stable stable trend -5.5 (-27.0, 22.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/24/2016 6:18 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top