Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Illinois 6,10 48.6 (48.1, 49.1) 6,495 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -1.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 43.3 (43.2, 43.4) 142,173 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.9, -3.3)
Piatt County 6,10 29.6 (20.3, 42.2) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.7 (-31.6, 14.1)
Jersey County 6,10 36.5 (27.2, 48.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.4 (-30.4, 20.6)
Champaign County 6,10 39.3 (35.1, 43.9) 66 2007-2011 falling falling trend -7.9 (-14.4, -0.8)
Stephenson County 6,10 39.5 (33.0, 47.2) 27 2007-2011 stable stable trend 12.9 (-28.3, 77.8)
Lake County 6,10 40.9 (38.7, 43.2) 263 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4 (-12.3, 5.1)
Mercer County 6,10 40.9 (30.1, 54.9) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.8 (-36.0, 78.4)
DuPage County 6,10 41.0 (39.1, 42.9) 379 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.1)
Wayne County 6,10 41.3 (30.7, 54.9) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.3 (-27.3, 5.9)
McLean County 6,10 42.3 (37.7, 47.3) 63 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.9 (-15.7, 11.8)
Union County 6,10 42.6 (31.8, 56.3) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-17.3, 18.1)
Jo Daviess County 6,10 42.7 (33.4, 54.2) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.6 (-27.1, 27.4)
Kane County 6,10 42.7 (39.9, 45.6) 183 2007-2011 falling falling trend -9.6 (-15.5, -3.3)
Woodford County 6,10 42.9 (34.7, 52.4) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.6 (-31.5, 50.7)
Jasper County 6,10 43.0 (28.7, 62.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 9.9 (-31.9, 77.5)
White County 6,10 45.3 (33.9, 60.1) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -13.9 (-36.5, 16.6)
McHenry County 6,10 45.4 (41.8, 49.3) 124 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.3, 4.5)
Shelby County 6,10 45.5 (35.3, 57.9) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.6 (-18.8, 24.7)
Moultrie County 6,10 45.5 (33.1, 61.4) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-31.2, 47.4)
Livingston County 6,10 46.0 (37.9, 55.4) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.3 (-24.5, 33.3)
Tazewell County 6,10 46.0 (41.5, 50.9) 76 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.1 (-6.9, 7.7)
Winnebago County 6,10 46.0 (42.8, 49.4) 152 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-10.4, 7.6)
Monroe County 6,10 46.3 (37.1, 57.1) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.6 (-16.6, 28.7)
Brown County 6,10 46.8 (26.7, 76.6) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-56.5, 95.6)
Whiteside County 6,10 47.0 (40.4, 54.5) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.9 (-37.6, 21.6)
Marion County 6,10 47.1 (39.0, 56.6) 25 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.3 (-16.0, -4.2)
Marshall County 6,10 47.5 (34.6, 64.4) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.4 (-31.3, 22.1)
Kendall County 6,10 47.7 (40.7, 55.5) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.3 (-17.2, 6.1)
Lee County 6,10 47.9 (39.3, 57.9) 22 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8 (-31.8, 24.1)
Putnam County 6,10 48.1 (29.3, 76.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-47.0, 77.2)
Boone County 6,10 48.2 (39.9, 57.6) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.2 (-28.0, 12.1)
Edwards County 6,10 48.2 (30.2, 74.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -16.7 (-31.1, 0.7)
Calhoun County 6,10 48.3 (28.8, 78.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.5 (-52.7, 80.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 48.5 (42.1, 55.5) 42 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-20.4, 13.2)
Macon County 6,10 48.7 (43.6, 54.3) 68 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.2 (-4.0, 13.0)
Rock Island County 6,10 49.1 (44.6, 54.0) 91 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.9 (-14.1, 5.3)
Franklin County 6,10 49.3 (41.2, 58.8) 27 2007-2011 stable stable trend -18.3 (-35.3, 3.1)
Ogle County 6,10 49.4 (41.9, 57.9) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-20.4, 21.1)
Will County 6,10 49.8 (47.1, 52.6) 278 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.0, -2.7)
Cook County 6,10 50.2 (49.3, 51.0) 2,623 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.8, 1.2)
Peoria County 6,10 50.2 (46.0, 54.8) 106 2007-2011 falling falling trend -6.8 (-11.3, -2.1)
Knox County 6,10 50.4 (43.2, 58.5) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-17.0, 2.2)
Douglas County 6,10 50.4 (38.5, 65.1) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-20.5, 13.5)
Henry County 6,10 50.5 (43.0, 59.1) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-15.7, 15.9)
Kankakee County 6,10 50.6 (45.1, 56.7) 62 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.6 (-16.4, 2.1)
Madison County 6,10 50.8 (47.3, 54.5) 158 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.2 (-14.8, 9.9)
Johnson County 6,10 50.9 (36.2, 70.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.9 (-1.5, 27.1)
Lawrence County 6,10 51.0 (38.3, 66.9) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.1 (-23.5, 25.3)
Coles County 6,10 51.0 (42.9, 60.3) 29 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.3 (-28.9, 10.7)
Perry County 6,10 51.1 (39.7, 64.8) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.6 (-16.6, 41.5)
La Salle County 6,10 51.1 (46.0, 56.7) 75 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-16.6, 13.8)
Jackson County 6,10 51.3 (43.0, 60.7) 28 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.4 (-23.4, 16.8)
St. Clair County 6,10 51.3 (47.6, 55.2) 146 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.7 (-15.5, 3.1)
Adams County 6,10 51.3 (44.7, 58.8) 45 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-9.4, 9.7)
Fayette County 6,10 51.4 (40.0, 65.1) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.5 (-30.8, 37.3)
Alexander County 6,10 51.4 (33.5, 75.9) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -30 (-57.8, 16.1)
Sangamon County 6,10 51.4 (47.3, 55.9) 115 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3 (-14.0, 9.3)
Morgan County 6,10 51.7 (42.5, 62.3) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.4 (-31.1, 27.1)
Pulaski County 6,10 51.7 (32.2, 79.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-30.0, 39.7)
Vermilion County 6,10 51.8 (45.7, 58.5) 54 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-16.9, 6.6)
Effingham County 6,10 52.1 (42.6, 63.2) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.8 (-9.4, 16.6)
Macoupin County 6,10 52.2 (44.5, 60.9) 34 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.4 (-7.0, 17.2)
Stark County 6,10 52.4 (32.3, 81.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Edgar County 6,10 52.5 (40.6, 67.1) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2 (-35.2, 48.2)
Schuyler County 6,10 52.7 (34.6, 78.0) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-45.7, 77.4)
Warren County 6,10 52.8 (40.0, 68.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.9, 5.2)
Bureau County 6,10 53.0 (43.9, 63.7) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3 (-14.8, 10.5)
Hardin County 6,10 53.0 (29.3, 90.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.4 (-24.9, 62.3)
Clark County 6,10 53.5 (40.6, 69.5) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.1 (-17.5, 21.0)
Randolph County 6,10 53.7 (44.1, 64.9) 22 2007-2011 rising rising trend 16.5 (6.1, 28.0)
McDonough County 6,10 53.8 (43.0, 66.5) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.1 (-21.2, 26.7)
Williamson County 6,10 53.9 (47.0, 61.6) 45 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.8 (-15.9, 23.3)
Grundy County 6,10 54.0 (44.8, 64.5) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.6 (-18.7, 7.3)
Ford County 6,10 54.0 (40.1, 71.7) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-24.9, 31.8)
Iroquois County 6,10 54.1 (44.5, 65.5) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.4 (-1.3, 12.6)
Carroll County 6,10 54.5 (41.8, 70.6) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.5 (-28.6, 14.8)
Clay County 6,10 55.1 (41.2, 72.7) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-20.3, 6.5)
Cumberland County 6,10 55.5 (39.1, 76.8) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-30.0, 16.4)
De Witt County 6,10 55.6 (41.9, 72.5) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.6 (-26.4, 66.2)
Cass County 6,10 55.9 (41.1, 74.7) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3 (-23.3, 22.7)
Hancock County 6,10 56.2 (44.6, 70.4) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.2 (-59.2, 115.4)
Richland County 6,10 56.8 (43.8, 73.0) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-37.0, 29.1)
Christian County 6,10 56.9 (47.6, 67.8) 27 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.5 (-13.9, 19.7)
Jefferson County 6,10 57.0 (47.8, 67.4) 28 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.9 (-19.9, 15.3)
Massac County 6,10 57.3 (43.6, 74.2) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.8 (-33.1, 16.4)
Wabash County 6,10 57.7 (42.3, 77.3) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.9 (-35.9, 38.0)
Henderson County 6,10 57.8 (40.1, 82.5) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.3 (-7.2, 17.2)
Mason County 6,10 57.9 (43.9, 75.4) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-14.8, 15.9)
Pike County 6,10 58.8 (45.3, 75.4) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend 13.4 (-20.8, 62.3)
Scott County 6,10 58.8 (36.0, 92.1) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 17 (-22.1, 75.7)
Fulton County 6,10 59.1 (49.7, 69.8) 29 2007-2011 falling falling trend -15 (-26.4, -1.9)
Clinton County 6,10 59.3 (49.5, 70.6) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.1 (-21.2, 29.8)
Menard County 6,10 59.5 (43.4, 80.1) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10 (-30.9, 17.3)
Montgomery County 6,10 60.7 (50.3, 72.8) 25 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3 (-23.9, 39.4)
Washington County 6,10 62.2 (47.2, 80.7) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.6 (-5.6, 22.6)
Bond County 6,10 63.2 (48.9, 80.7) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-13.7, 17.5)
Greene County 6,10 64.4 (48.7, 83.9) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.4 (-35.7, 72.9)
Logan County 6,10 65.6 (54.3, 78.7) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.2 (-21.8, 17.2)
Saline County 6,10 66.5 (54.6, 80.4) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.6 (-18.9, 9.9)
Hamilton County 6,10 70.0 (50.2, 95.8) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.3 (-29.8, 58.0)
Gallatin County 6,10 73.4 (49.3, 106.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.9 (-60.3, 57.8)
Crawford County 6,10 74.6 (60.4, 91.5) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.6 (-41.8, 8.2)
Pope County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/21/2014 6:22 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top