Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Illinois 6,10 12.4 (12.0, 12.7) 899 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
Adams County 6,10 14.3 (9.5, 20.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.6 (-24.4, 39.4)
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bond County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Boone County 6,10 13.4 (8.0, 21.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.3 (-49.9, 130.1)
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bureau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Cass County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Champaign County 6,10 9.8 (7.2, 13.2) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.1 (-22.2, 18.2)
Christian County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Coles County 6,10 19.8 (13.1, 28.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.4 (-48.6, 60.0)
Cook County 6,10 12.7 (12.1, 13.3) 368 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.7)
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Cumberland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
De Witt County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
DeKalb County 6,10 19.9 (14.4, 26.7) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.8 (-32.5, 17.9)
Douglas County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
DuPage County 6,10 12.1 (10.8, 13.6) 62 2007-2011 falling falling trend -8.4 (-11.2, -5.5)
Edgar County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Edwards County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Effingham County 6,10 16.7 (9.6, 27.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.9 (-17.7, 52.2)
Fayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Franklin County 6,10 15.5 (9.7, 24.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.2 (-33.6, 35.3)
Fulton County 6,10 18.1 (11.3, 28.0) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-32.2, 46.8)
Gallatin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Grundy County 6,10 15.9 (9.5, 24.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Hamilton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Henderson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Henry County 6,10 9.9 (5.8, 16.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.7 (-53.8, 113.4)
Iroquois County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.5 (-71.5, 233.8)
Jackson County 6,10 13.0 (7.5, 20.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.9 (-30.2, 29.6)
Jasper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jersey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jo Daviess County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Johnson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Kane County 6,10 11.5 (9.7, 13.7) 28 2007-2011 falling falling trend -17.3 (-25.6, -8.1)
Kankakee County 6,10 8.8 (5.8, 12.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.3 (-39.8, 28.0)
Kendall County 6,10 8.8 (5.2, 13.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.1 (-52.4, 34.1)
Knox County 6,10 9.2 (5.3, 15.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
La Salle County 6,10 15.4 (11.4, 20.3) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-19.7, 26.6)
Lake County 6,10 11.6 (10.0, 13.3) 42 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-18.0, 15.9)
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lee County 6,10 12.6 (7.2, 21.0) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.1 (-46.9, 35.9)
Livingston County 6,10 12.9 (7.3, 21.5) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 26.7 (-20.3, 101.4)
Logan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Macon County 6,10 11.3 (8.1, 15.4) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-33.5, 40.5)
Macoupin County 6,10 10.1 (5.7, 16.9) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.4 (-34.7, 40.1)
Madison County 6,10 11.6 (9.3, 14.3) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.6 (-20.4, 14.4)
Marion County 6,10 15.8 (9.2, 25.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-51.4, 90.7)
Marshall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mason County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Massac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
McDonough County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.5 (-55.3, 144.5)
McHenry County 6,10 15.6 (12.9, 18.7) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.3 (-14.4, 27.1)
McLean County 6,10 11.0 (8.0, 14.7) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-24.1, 7.2)
Menard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mercer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 falling falling trend -19.8 (-35.6, -0.1)
Moultrie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ogle County 6,10 11.1 (6.6, 17.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.1 (-39.4, 30.3)
Peoria County 6,10 13.1 (10.2, 16.6) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-35.3, 31.1)
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Piatt County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pope County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pulaski County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Putnam County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Randolph County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Richland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Rock Island County 6,10 11.9 (9.0, 15.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.5 (-27.1, 12.3)
Saline County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Sangamon County 6,10 11.9 (9.2, 15.0) 15 2007-2011 rising rising trend 16.4 (7.3, 26.2)
Schuyler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Shelby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
St. Clair County 6,10 10.7 (8.5, 13.2) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.1 (-23.1, 57.7)
Stark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Stephenson County 6,10 14.7 (9.4, 22.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 31.4 (-21.2, 119.0)
Tazewell County 6,10 12.0 (8.9, 15.9) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-47.1, 77.6)
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Vermilion County 6,10 15.8 (11.3, 21.7) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.4 (-8.4, 33.1)
Wabash County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Whiteside County 6,10 15.0 (9.9, 22.1) 6 2007-2011 falling falling trend -9.3 (-17.3, -0.4)
Will County 6,10 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4 (-16.9, 10.9)
Williamson County 6,10 12.7 (8.4, 18.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 16 (-55.4, 201.3)
Winnebago County 6,10 13.7 (11.4, 16.5) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-17.3, 10.7)
Woodford County 6,10 16.6 (9.9, 26.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 13.8 (-3.8, 34.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/18/2014 8:30 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top