Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Illinois by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Illinois 6,10 12.4 (12.0, 12.7) 899 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 12.0 (12.0, 12.1) 21,341 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.1, -1.7)
DeKalb County 6,10 19.9 (14.4, 26.7) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.8 (-32.5, 17.9)
Coles County 6,10 19.8 (13.1, 28.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.4 (-48.6, 60.0)
Fulton County 6,10 18.1 (11.3, 28.0) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-32.2, 46.8)
Effingham County 6,10 16.7 (9.6, 27.2) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.9 (-17.7, 52.2)
Woodford County 6,10 16.6 (9.9, 26.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 13.8 (-3.8, 34.7)
Grundy County 6,10 15.9 (9.5, 24.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Marion County 6,10 15.8 (9.2, 25.4) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-51.4, 90.7)
Vermilion County 6,10 15.8 (11.3, 21.7) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.4 (-8.4, 33.1)
McHenry County 6,10 15.6 (12.9, 18.7) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.3 (-14.4, 27.1)
Franklin County 6,10 15.5 (9.7, 24.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.2 (-33.6, 35.3)
La Salle County 6,10 15.4 (11.4, 20.3) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-19.7, 26.6)
Whiteside County 6,10 15.0 (9.9, 22.1) 6 2007-2011 falling falling trend -9.3 (-17.3, -0.4)
Stephenson County 6,10 14.7 (9.4, 22.3) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend 31.4 (-21.2, 119.0)
Adams County 6,10 14.3 (9.5, 20.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.6 (-24.4, 39.4)
Winnebago County 6,10 13.7 (11.4, 16.5) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.3 (-17.3, 10.7)
Boone County 6,10 13.4 (8.0, 21.0) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.3 (-49.9, 130.1)
Peoria County 6,10 13.1 (10.2, 16.6) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-35.3, 31.1)
Jackson County 6,10 13.0 (7.5, 20.9) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.9 (-30.2, 29.6)
Livingston County 6,10 12.9 (7.3, 21.5) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend 26.7 (-20.3, 101.4)
Williamson County 6,10 12.7 (8.4, 18.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend 16 (-55.4, 201.3)
Cook County 6,10 12.7 (12.1, 13.3) 368 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.3, 2.7)
Lee County 6,10 12.6 (7.2, 21.0) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -15.1 (-46.9, 35.9)
DuPage County 6,10 12.1 (10.8, 13.6) 62 2007-2011 falling falling trend -8.4 (-11.2, -5.5)
Tazewell County 6,10 12.0 (8.9, 15.9) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-47.1, 77.6)
Rock Island County 6,10 11.9 (9.0, 15.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.5 (-27.1, 12.3)
Sangamon County 6,10 11.9 (9.2, 15.0) 15 2007-2011 rising rising trend 16.4 (7.3, 26.2)
Madison County 6,10 11.6 (9.3, 14.3) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.6 (-20.4, 14.4)
Will County 6,10 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4 (-16.9, 10.9)
Lake County 6,10 11.6 (10.0, 13.3) 42 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-18.0, 15.9)
Kane County 6,10 11.5 (9.7, 13.7) 28 2007-2011 falling falling trend -17.3 (-25.6, -8.1)
Macon County 6,10 11.3 (8.1, 15.4) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-33.5, 40.5)
Ogle County 6,10 11.1 (6.6, 17.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.1 (-39.4, 30.3)
McLean County 6,10 11.0 (8.0, 14.7) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -9.8 (-24.1, 7.2)
St. Clair County 6,10 10.7 (8.5, 13.2) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend 10.1 (-23.1, 57.7)
Macoupin County 6,10 10.1 (5.7, 16.9) 3 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.4 (-34.7, 40.1)
Henry County 6,10 9.9 (5.8, 16.2) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.7 (-53.8, 113.4)
Champaign County 6,10 9.8 (7.2, 13.2) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.1 (-22.2, 18.2)
Knox County 6,10 9.2 (5.3, 15.3) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (0.0, 0.0)
Kendall County 6,10 8.8 (5.2, 13.8) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend -20.1 (-52.4, 34.1)
Kankakee County 6,10 8.8 (5.8, 12.8) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.3 (-39.8, 28.0)
Alexander County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bond County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Bureau County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Calhoun County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Cass County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Christian County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Clinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Cumberland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
De Witt County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Douglas County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Edgar County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Edwards County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Fayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Ford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Gallatin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hamilton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hancock County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Hardin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Henderson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Iroquois County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.5 (-71.5, 233.8)
Jasper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jersey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Jo Daviess County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Johnson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Logan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Marshall County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mason County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Massac County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
McDonough County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 stable stable trend 4.5 (-55.3, 144.5)
Menard County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Mercer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Monroe County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Montgomery County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Morgan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 falling falling trend -19.8 (-35.6, -0.1)
Moultrie County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Piatt County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pope County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Pulaski County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Putnam County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Randolph County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Richland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Saline County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Schuyler County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Shelby County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Stark County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wabash County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Wayne County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/22/2014 9:14 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top