Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Indiana by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Ovary, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Indiana 6,10 11.6 (11.1, 12.1) 440 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.9 (-9.5, 0.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 11.8 (11.8, 11.9) 21,341 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.7, -1.8)
Bartholomew County 6,10 7.4 (4.4, 11.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Hancock County 6,10 9.3 (5.6, 14.6) 4 2008-2012 * *
Grant County 6,10 9.3 (5.8, 14.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 6,10 9.8 (6.7, 13.9) 7 2008-2012 * *
Marion County 6,10 10.3 (9.0, 11.7) 50 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.3 (-14.9, 3.2)
Floyd County 6,10 10.4 (6.5, 15.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Kosciusko County 6,10 10.8 (6.9, 16.1) 5 2008-2012 * *
Hamilton County 6,10 10.8 (8.4, 13.7) 14 2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 6,10 11.0 (7.0, 16.5) 5 2008-2012 * *
Marshall County 6,10 11.0 (6.3, 18.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
LaPorte County 6,10 11.1 (7.8, 15.5) 8 2008-2012 * *
Elkhart County 6,10 11.2 (8.5, 14.5) 12 2008-2012 * *
Hendricks County 6,10 11.3 (8.2, 15.3) 9 2008-2012 * *
Howard County 6,10 11.6 (7.7, 16.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Clark County 6,10 11.7 (8.3, 16.1) 8 2008-2012 * *
St. Joseph County 6,10 12.0 (9.6, 14.7) 19 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.2 (-13.0, 32.0)
Noble County 6,10 12.3 (7.1, 20.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
Johnson County 6,10 12.4 (9.2, 16.4) 10 2008-2012 * *
Morgan County 6,10 12.5 (8.0, 18.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Vanderburgh County 6,10 12.6 (9.8, 16.1) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend -16.2 (-44.4, 26.5)
Madison County 6,10 12.6 (9.4, 16.7) 11 2008-2012 * *
Lake County 6,10 12.7 (10.9, 14.6) 38 2008-2012 falling falling trend -11.9 (-15.4, -8.2)
Tippecanoe County 6,10 13.0 (9.7, 17.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 6,10 13.5 (7.8, 22.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 6,10 13.5 (8.6, 20.6) 5 2008-2012 * *
Allen County 6,10 13.5 (11.3, 16.1) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.7 (-17.8, 12.8)
Vigo County 6,10 14.0 (10.1, 19.0) 9 2008-2012 * *
Warrick County 6,10 14.0 (9.1, 20.8) 5 2008-2012 * *
Porter County 6,10 15.0 (11.6, 19.0) 14 2008-2012 * *
Delaware County 6,10 15.3 (11.4, 20.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Shelby County 6,10 15.4 (9.4, 23.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Miami County 6,10 16.1 (9.2, 26.2) 3 2008-2012 * *
Huntington County 6,10 16.2 (9.8, 25.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 6,10 16.3 (9.8, 25.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Putnam County 6,10 16.3 (9.4, 26.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Adams County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Benton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Blackford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Boone County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Brown County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Carroll County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cass County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clinton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Daviess County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
DeKalb County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dearborn County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Decatur County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Dubois County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Fayette County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Fountain County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Franklin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Fulton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Gibson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Greene County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Harrison County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jasper County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jay County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Jennings County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Knox County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
LaGrange County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lawrence County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Martin County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Newton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ohio County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Orange County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Owen County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Parke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Perry County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pike County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Posey County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pulaski County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Randolph County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ripley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Rush County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Scott County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Spencer County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Starke County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Steuben County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sullivan County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Switzerland County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Tipton County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Union County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Vermillion County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wabash County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Warren County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Washington County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wells County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
White County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Whitley County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/05/2015 8:27 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top