Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent AAPC
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 48.4 (47.4, 49.4) 1,753 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3 (-3.4, -2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 43.3 (43.2, 43.4) 142,173 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.9, -3.3)
Polk County 7,8 45.2 (42.3, 48.3) 180 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Linn County 7,8 44.7 (40.8, 48.8) 101 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.9, -3.0)
Scott County 7,8 44.9 (40.6, 49.6) 80 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Black Hawk County 7,8 45.6 (40.7, 50.9) 67 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4 (-6.1, -1.9)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 54.3 (48.2, 61.1) 58 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.3)
Woodbury County 7,8 45.3 (39.7, 51.4) 49 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Dubuque County 7,8 40.1 (34.9, 45.8) 45 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Johnson County 7,8 40.9 (35.3, 47.0) 40 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.8, -1.9)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 57.1 (48.7, 66.6) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-2.3, 0.3)
Clinton County 7,8 53.4 (45.7, 62.2) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Story County 7,8 41.4 (35.0, 48.6) 31 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Lee County 7,8 57.5 (48.1, 68.3) 28 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Marshall County 7,8 50.9 (42.4, 60.7) 27 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Warren County 7,8 52.5 (43.9, 62.4) 27 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Des Moines County 7,8 47.9 (39.7, 57.4) 25 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Jasper County 7,8 50.6 (42.0, 60.5) 25 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Dallas County 7,8 41.8 (34.5, 50.1) 24 2007-2011 falling falling trend -13.1 (-21.5, -3.8)
Wapello County 7,8 50.6 (41.7, 60.8) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Marion County 7,8 57.2 (47.2, 68.8) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Muscatine County 7,8 47.1 (38.7, 56.8) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-9.7, 15.4)
Mahaska County 7,8 74.9 (60.9, 91.3) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Webster County 7,8 41.6 (33.8, 50.7) 21 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.2)
Plymouth County 7,8 58.3 (46.6, 72.1) 18 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2 (-3.5, -0.4)
Fayette County 7,8 58.4 (46.7, 72.4) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Sioux County 7,8 43.8 (34.8, 54.5) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Carroll County 7,8 52.7 (41.5, 66.4) 16 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Jackson County 7,8 58.1 (45.7, 73.2) 16 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Dickinson County 7,8 53.3 (41.5, 68.0) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Hardin County 7,8 51.9 (40.3, 66.2) 15 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Bremer County 7,8 44.0 (33.9, 56.3) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Page County 7,8 58.1 (44.7, 74.7) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.6 (-23.6, 0.0)
Boone County 7,8 41.0 (31.6, 52.5) 14 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Poweshiek County 7,8 47.8 (36.8, 61.5) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.0)
Harrison County 7,8 63.3 (48.9, 81.1) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Benton County 7,8 40.6 (31.2, 52.1) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Jones County 7,8 45.9 (35.4, 58.9) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Winneshiek County 7,8 46.8 (36.0, 60.1) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -0.9)
Clayton County 7,8 48.3 (37.1, 62.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.1)
Cass County 7,8 58.2 (44.3, 75.8) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Kossuth County 7,8 49.4 (37.7, 64.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8)
Tama County 7,8 48.3 (36.8, 62.6) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.0, -1.2)
Buena Vista County 7,8 50.2 (38.0, 65.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Floyd County 7,8 53.6 (40.7, 69.7) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Henry County 7,8 48.2 (36.8, 62.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Washington County 7,8 41.8 (31.9, 54.1) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -0.9)
Allamakee County 7,8 61.3 (46.4, 79.9) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.9)
Cedar County 7,8 49.6 (37.5, 64.7) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.4)
Clay County 7,8 51.0 (38.5, 66.7) 12 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Hamilton County 7,8 54.6 (41.2, 71.4) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Buchanan County 7,8 43.6 (33.0, 56.8) 12 2007-2011 falling falling trend -11.1 (-16.9, -4.8)
Montgomery County 7,8 68.2 (51.3, 89.9) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.9)
Sac County 7,8 70.5 (52.2, 94.0) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Wright County 7,8 55.1 (41.2, 72.9) 11 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2 (-3.6, -0.4)
Cherokee County 7,8 53.9 (39.7, 72.4) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.7)
Appanoose County 7,8 54.0 (39.7, 72.4) 10 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Crawford County 7,8 44.6 (32.7, 59.6) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Guthrie County 7,8 60.0 (44.4, 80.4) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Lucas County 7,8 68.0 (50.1, 91.4) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.2)
Delaware County 7,8 43.4 (31.7, 58.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Greene County 7,8 65.7 (47.9, 88.9) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Shelby County 7,8 46.2 (33.8, 62.8) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Calhoun County 7,8 52.1 (37.8, 71.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
Jefferson County 7,8 49.5 (35.7, 67.1) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.0)
Mitchell County 7,8 58.5 (41.9, 80.1) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.6)
Monona County 7,8 57.0 (41.4, 78.0) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Butler County 7,8 40.4 (29.2, 55.1) 9 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Hancock County 7,8 54.1 (38.8, 74.2) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Grundy County 7,8 46.1 (32.9, 63.4) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Mills County 7,8 45.8 (32.7, 62.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.1)
Union County 7,8 48.4 (34.5, 66.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Winnebago County 7,8 55.0 (39.0, 76.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Palo Alto County 7,8 55.4 (38.5, 77.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Franklin County 7,8 45.9 (32.3, 64.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Howard County 7,8 60.5 (42.1, 84.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.8)
Lyon County 7,8 53.0 (37.6, 73.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
O'Brien County 7,8 40.4 (28.1, 56.5) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.0)
Emmet County 7,8 49.7 (34.7, 69.8) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Keokuk County 7,8 49.5 (34.8, 69.0) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
Worth County 7,8 76.3 (53.9, 105.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.5)
Iowa County 7,8 31.7 (22.3, 44.2) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Audubon County 7,8 73.3 (50.2, 105.1) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.2)
Chickasaw County 7,8 37.7 (26.1, 53.5) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.4, 0.0)
Osceola County 7,8 77.2 (52.7, 110.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-2.6, 4.9)
Clarke County 7,8 54.9 (37.8, 77.8) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-1.6, 5.8)
Louisa County 7,8 48.8 (33.8, 68.7) 7 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.3)
Ida County 7,8 57.9 (39.1, 84.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Van Buren County 7 58.1 (39.6, 83.4) 7 2007-2011 * *
Decatur County 7,8 51.5 (34.0, 75.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Humboldt County 7,8 36.8 (24.4, 54.4) 6 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.7)
Wayne County 7,8 57.4 (36.3, 87.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-10.4, 0.7)
Davis County 7,8 50.0 (32.5, 74.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Fremont County 7,8 47.2 (30.6, 70.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.2)
Madison County 7,8 28.5 (18.4, 42.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.2)
Pocahontas County 7,8 40.6 (25.8, 62.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.6)
Adair County 7 38.2 (24.2, 58.8) 5 2007-2011 * *
Monroe County 7,8 38.5 (24.1, 59.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
Ringgold County 7 48.9 (30.1, 78.0) 4 2007-2011 * *
Taylor County 7,8 44.0 (26.7, 70.0) 4 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -2.0)
Adams County 7,8 57.6 (34.5, 93.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 5.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/31/2014 2:37 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2013 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are EAPCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top