Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Colon & Rectum, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 48.4 (47.4, 49.4) 1,753 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3 (-3.4, -2.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 43.3 (43.2, 43.4) 142,173 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-4.9, -3.3)
Osceola County 7,8 77.2 (52.7, 110.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-2.6, 4.9)
Worth County 7,8 76.3 (53.9, 105.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.5)
Mahaska County 7,8 74.9 (60.9, 91.3) 21 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Audubon County 7,8 73.3 (50.2, 105.1) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.4, 6.2)
Sac County 7,8 70.5 (52.2, 94.0) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
Montgomery County 7,8 68.2 (51.3, 89.9) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.9)
Lucas County 7,8 68.0 (50.1, 91.4) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.9, 4.2)
Greene County 7,8 65.7 (47.9, 88.9) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.6, 2.8)
Harrison County 7,8 63.3 (48.9, 81.1) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.5, 0.6)
Allamakee County 7,8 61.3 (46.4, 79.9) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.9)
Howard County 7,8 60.5 (42.1, 84.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.8)
Guthrie County 7,8 60.0 (44.4, 80.4) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.3, 1.5)
Mitchell County 7,8 58.5 (41.9, 80.1) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.2, 3.6)
Fayette County 7,8 58.4 (46.7, 72.4) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Plymouth County 7,8 58.3 (46.6, 72.1) 18 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2 (-3.5, -0.4)
Cass County 7,8 58.2 (44.3, 75.8) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Jackson County 7,8 58.1 (45.7, 73.2) 16 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Page County 7,8 58.1 (44.7, 74.7) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.6 (-23.6, 0.0)
Van Buren County 7 58.1 (39.6, 83.4) 7 2007-2011 * *
Ida County 7,8 57.9 (39.1, 84.0) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.4)
Adams County 7,8 57.6 (34.5, 93.7) 4 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.8, 5.7)
Lee County 7,8 57.5 (48.1, 68.3) 28 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Wayne County 7,8 57.4 (36.3, 87.4) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5 (-10.4, 0.7)
Marion County 7,8 57.2 (47.2, 68.8) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.8, 1.1)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 57.1 (48.7, 66.6) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-2.3, 0.3)
Monona County 7,8 57.0 (41.4, 78.0) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Palo Alto County 7,8 55.4 (38.5, 77.9) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.8)
Wright County 7,8 55.1 (41.2, 72.9) 11 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2 (-3.6, -0.4)
Winnebago County 7,8 55.0 (39.0, 76.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.8)
Clarke County 7,8 54.9 (37.8, 77.8) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-1.6, 5.8)
Hamilton County 7,8 54.6 (41.2, 71.4) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 54.3 (48.2, 61.1) 58 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.3)
Hancock County 7,8 54.1 (38.8, 74.2) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.7, 1.7)
Appanoose County 7,8 54.0 (39.7, 72.4) 10 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.8, -0.1)
Cherokee County 7,8 53.9 (39.7, 72.4) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.3, 2.7)
Floyd County 7,8 53.6 (40.7, 69.7) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Clinton County 7,8 53.4 (45.7, 62.2) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Dickinson County 7,8 53.3 (41.5, 68.0) 15 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
Lyon County 7,8 53.0 (37.6, 73.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Carroll County 7,8 52.7 (41.5, 66.4) 16 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.4)
Warren County 7,8 52.5 (43.9, 62.4) 27 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.3, -0.4)
Calhoun County 7,8 52.1 (37.8, 71.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.3)
Hardin County 7,8 51.9 (40.3, 66.2) 15 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Decatur County 7,8 51.5 (34.0, 75.7) 6 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Clay County 7,8 51.0 (38.5, 66.7) 12 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)
Marshall County 7,8 50.9 (42.4, 60.7) 27 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Jasper County 7,8 50.6 (42.0, 60.5) 25 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Wapello County 7,8 50.6 (41.7, 60.8) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.5, 0.0)
Buena Vista County 7,8 50.2 (38.0, 65.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.5, 0.0)
Davis County 7,8 50.0 (32.5, 74.1) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.0, 2.2)
Emmet County 7,8 49.7 (34.7, 69.8) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
Cedar County 7,8 49.6 (37.5, 64.7) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.8 (-5.9, 0.4)
Jefferson County 7,8 49.5 (35.7, 67.1) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.3, 5.0)
Keokuk County 7,8 49.5 (34.8, 69.0) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.7, -0.2)
Kossuth County 7,8 49.4 (37.7, 64.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8)
Ringgold County 7 48.9 (30.1, 78.0) 4 2007-2011 * *
Louisa County 7,8 48.8 (33.8, 68.7) 7 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.8, -1.3)
Union County 7,8 48.4 (34.5, 66.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Tama County 7,8 48.3 (36.8, 62.6) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -10.5 (-19.0, -1.2)
Clayton County 7,8 48.3 (37.1, 62.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.1, 1.1)
Henry County 7,8 48.2 (36.8, 62.2) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.1)
Des Moines County 7,8 47.9 (39.7, 57.4) 25 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Poweshiek County 7,8 47.8 (36.8, 61.5) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.0, 1.0)
Fremont County 7,8 47.2 (30.6, 70.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.0, 0.2)
Muscatine County 7,8 47.1 (38.7, 56.8) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.1 (-9.7, 15.4)
Winneshiek County 7,8 46.8 (36.0, 60.1) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -0.9)
Shelby County 7,8 46.2 (33.8, 62.8) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.6)
Grundy County 7,8 46.1 (32.9, 63.4) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 2.0)
Jones County 7,8 45.9 (35.4, 58.9) 13 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Franklin County 7,8 45.9 (32.3, 64.1) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Mills County 7,8 45.8 (32.7, 62.6) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.8, 1.1)
Black Hawk County 7,8 45.6 (40.7, 50.9) 67 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4 (-6.1, -1.9)
Woodbury County 7,8 45.3 (39.7, 51.4) 49 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Polk County 7,8 45.2 (42.3, 48.3) 180 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)
Scott County 7,8 44.9 (40.6, 49.6) 80 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.6)
Linn County 7,8 44.7 (40.8, 48.8) 101 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.9, -3.0)
Crawford County 7,8 44.6 (32.7, 59.6) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 0.7)
Taylor County 7,8 44.0 (26.7, 70.0) 4 2007-2011 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.1, -2.0)
Bremer County 7,8 44.0 (33.9, 56.3) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Sioux County 7,8 43.8 (34.8, 54.5) 17 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Buchanan County 7,8 43.6 (33.0, 56.8) 12 2007-2011 falling falling trend -11.1 (-16.9, -4.8)
Delaware County 7,8 43.4 (31.7, 58.2) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.2)
Washington County 7,8 41.8 (31.9, 54.1) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -0.9)
Dallas County 7,8 41.8 (34.5, 50.1) 24 2007-2011 falling falling trend -13.1 (-21.5, -3.8)
Webster County 7,8 41.6 (33.8, 50.7) 21 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.2, -2.2)
Story County 7,8 41.4 (35.0, 48.6) 31 2007-2011 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
Boone County 7,8 41.0 (31.6, 52.5) 14 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Johnson County 7,8 40.9 (35.3, 47.0) 40 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.8, -1.9)
Pocahontas County 7,8 40.6 (25.8, 62.8) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.6)
Benton County 7,8 40.6 (31.2, 52.1) 13 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Butler County 7,8 40.4 (29.2, 55.1) 9 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
O'Brien County 7,8 40.4 (28.1, 56.5) 8 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.0)
Dubuque County 7,8 40.1 (34.9, 45.8) 45 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Monroe County 7,8 38.5 (24.1, 59.4) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
Adair County 7 38.2 (24.2, 58.8) 5 2007-2011 * *
Chickasaw County 7,8 37.7 (26.1, 53.5) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.4, 0.0)
Humboldt County 7,8 36.8 (24.4, 54.4) 6 2007-2011 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.7)
Iowa County 7,8 31.7 (22.3, 44.2) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.6, 0.3)
Madison County 7,8 28.5 (18.4, 42.2) 5 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/18/2014 11:39 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2013 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top