Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 65.7 (64.5, 66.9) 2,393 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.8, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 63.7 (63.6, 63.8) 213,812 § falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Buena Vista County 7,8 35.7 (25.8, 48.5) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.6, 2.9)
Winneshiek County 7,8 36.5 (27.1, 48.4) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.0, 1.5)
Howard County 7,8 39.5 (25.8, 58.7) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.8, 3.1)
Poweshiek County 7,8 40.3 (30.0, 53.4) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.6)
Butler County 7,8 40.5 (29.3, 55.2) 9 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.0, 2.0)
Allamakee County 7,8 43.0 (30.9, 58.7) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.2)
Sioux County 7,8 43.0 (34.1, 53.7) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Davis County 7,8 44.3 (28.6, 66.3) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Bremer County 7,8 44.6 (34.8, 56.6) 14 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Mitchell County 7,8 44.6 (31.5, 62.4) 8 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.0, 0.5)
Cherokee County 7,8 45.9 (33.1, 63.0) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.8, 2.1)
Ida County 7,8 46.7 (30.5, 70.1) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.1, 1.3)
Grundy County 7,8 47.2 (34.0, 64.5) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.1)
Humboldt County 7,8 47.4 (33.5, 66.4) 8 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.5)
Worth County 7,8 48.3 (31.1, 72.7) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.2, 2.5)
Osceola County 7,8 48.3 (30.2, 74.9) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 3.9)
Crawford County 7,8 48.6 (36.3, 64.1) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Lyon County 7,8 48.9 (34.0, 68.4) 7 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.2, 0.2)
Audubon County 7,8 50.4 (32.7, 76.9) 5 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 5.0)
O'Brien County 7,8 50.7 (38.0, 66.9) 11 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.3, 2.3)
Johnson County 7,8 50.8 (44.5, 57.7) 50 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Washington County 7,8 51.5 (40.4, 64.9) 15 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.8, 2.2)
Shelby County 7,8 51.9 (38.1, 69.9) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.1, 2.4)
Chickasaw County 7,8 51.9 (38.1, 69.8) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.7)
Lucas County 7,8 52.2 (36.3, 73.7) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.2, 1.9)
Jefferson County 7,8 52.2 (38.7, 69.3) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.1, 2.3)
Pocahontas County 7,8 52.3 (35.6, 76.0) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.0, 2.9)
Sac County 7,8 52.8 (38.4, 72.0) 9 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.1)
Palo Alto County 7,8 53.5 (37.9, 74.4) 8 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.3, 2.2)
Calhoun County 7,8 53.9 (38.8, 74.1) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Clay County 7,8 54.1 (41.2, 70.1) 13 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Plymouth County 7,8 54.1 (43.4, 67.0) 18 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
Marion County 7,8 54.4 (44.7, 65.7) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.4, 1.3)
Fayette County 7,8 55.0 (44.0, 68.3) 18 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Franklin County 7,8 56.1 (40.7, 76.3) 9 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.1, 5.8)
Delaware County 7,8 56.5 (43.4, 72.6) 13 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.4, 1.6)
Clayton County 7,8 57.1 (44.9, 72.0) 16 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.8, 2.6)
Kossuth County 7,8 57.1 (44.5, 73.0) 14 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.0)
Iowa County 7,8 58.1 (44.6, 74.8) 13 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.6)
Story County 7,8 58.5 (50.8, 66.9) 43 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.0)
Monona County 7,8 58.6 (42.7, 79.9) 9 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5)
Winnebago County 7,8 58.7 (42.6, 79.8) 9 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.6, 5.1)
Dickinson County 7,8 59.6 (47.5, 74.7) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.0, 0.2)
Jones County 7,8 60.1 (47.9, 74.7) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Hardin County 7,8 60.7 (47.9, 76.3) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.6)
Taylor County 7,8 61.5 (41.1, 90.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.0 (-2.9, 2.9)
Wright County 7,8 62.3 (47.3, 81.1) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.7)
Hamilton County 7,8 62.5 (48.0, 80.4) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Dubuque County 7,8 62.6 (56.2, 69.5) 72 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.3)
Decatur County 7,8 62.8 (44.1, 87.7) 7 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.3)
Carroll County 7,8 62.8 (50.4, 77.6) 18 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.5)
Hancock County 7,8 62.9 (46.5, 84.0) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.1, 3.0)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 63.0 (54.5, 72.7) 40 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Floyd County 7,8 63.1 (49.1, 80.2) 15 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.8)
Adair County 7,8 63.4 (44.6, 88.8) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.5)
Muscatine County 7,8 63.6 (53.8, 74.8) 31 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Montgomery County 7,8 63.9 (47.2, 85.5) 10 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 1.9)
Ringgold County 7 63.9 (42.3, 95.5) 6
*
*
Guthrie County 7,8 63.9 (47.9, 84.6) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.7)
Greene County 7,8 64.3 (46.5, 87.8) 9 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 5.6)
Madison County 7,8 64.5 (49.0, 83.5) 12 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.3)
Clinton County 7,8 65.0 (56.5, 74.6) 43 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Marshall County 7,8 65.7 (56.1, 76.5) 35 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.1)
Dallas County 7,8 65.7 (56.5, 75.9) 38 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.2)
Cedar County 7,8 65.7 (51.9, 82.4) 16 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.3, 2.3)
Wayne County 7,8 65.7 (44.8, 94.8) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Emmet County 7,8 66.3 (48.4, 89.3) 10 stable stable trend 1.1 (-1.2, 3.4)
Boone County 7,8 66.4 (54.6, 80.2) 23 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 2.0)
Adams County 7,8 67.7 (40.3, 109.0) 4 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 3.5)
Linn County 7,8 68.1 (63.4, 73.1) 155 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Louisa County 7,8 69.1 (51.0, 91.9) 10 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.4, 3.5)
Keokuk County 7,8 70.0 (52.2, 92.6) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Jackson County 7,8 70.1 (56.6, 86.2) 19 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Benton County 7,8 70.1 (57.7, 84.6) 23 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 0.8)
Warren County 7,8 70.5 (60.5, 81.8) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Van Buren County 7,8 71.4 (51.3, 98.0) 8 rising rising trend 1.6 (0.1, 3.3)
Henry County 7,8 71.8 (57.7, 88.6) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Lee County 7,8 72.5 (62.0, 84.3) 35 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Wapello County 7,8 72.7 (61.9, 85.0) 33 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Woodbury County 7,8 72.8 (65.7, 80.4) 79 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 0.9)
Mills County 7,8 73.9 (57.0, 94.4) 14 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.1)
Cass County 7,8 73.9 (57.7, 93.8) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.3, 1.9)
Scott County 7,8 74.9 (69.3, 80.9) 135 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Buchanan County 7,8 75.0 (60.6, 91.9) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Polk County 7,8 75.2 (71.4, 79.2) 302 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Webster County 7,8 75.3 (64.8, 87.2) 38 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Jasper County 7,8 75.7 (65.1, 87.7) 37 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.6)
Union County 7,8 76.8 (59.1, 98.7) 13 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.0, 1.8)
Mahaska County 7,8 76.9 (62.8, 93.4) 21 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.9, 2.8)
Black Hawk County 7,8 77.2 (70.8, 83.9) 113 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Tama County 7,8 79.3 (64.2, 97.3) 20 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.5)
Monroe County 7,8 79.7 (58.2, 107.6) 9 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.3, 3.2)
Clarke County 7,8 80.6 (59.4, 107.5) 10 rising rising trend 3.4 (1.0, 5.8)
Fremont County 7,8 81.4 (58.6, 111.2) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.9)
Harrison County 7,8 82.5 (65.5, 103.0) 17 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.1)
Appanoose County 7,8 84.5 (66.8, 106.0) 16 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
Des Moines County 7,8 85.7 (75.0, 97.7) 48 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.3)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 89.7 (81.8, 98.2) 97 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.5, 0.9)
Page County 7,8 92.8 (75.7, 113.0) 22 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.1, 2.7)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/02/2016 5:34 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top