Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 53.6 (52.1, 55.1) 1,064 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Sioux County 7 24.9 (16.0, 37.1) 5
*
*
Butler County 7,8 25.9 (14.2, 44.8) 3
*
*
O'Brien County 7 28.8 (16.5, 48.6) 3
*
*
Bremer County 7,8 30.6 (20.0, 45.5) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.2)
Plymouth County 7,8 33.0 (21.6, 48.6) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 5.0)
Mitchell County 7,8 33.5 (18.6, 58.5) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 2.1)
Calhoun County 7 34.7 (18.5, 62.6) 3
*
*
Greene County 7 35.7 (20.0, 62.9) 3
*
*
Monona County 7 36.4 (20.1, 64.6) 3
*
*
Buena Vista County 7,8 37.2 (23.8, 56.0) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-9.2, 4.7)
Clayton County 7,8 37.5 (24.8, 55.9) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.4, 5.9)
Kossuth County 7,8 37.6 (24.0, 58.2) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.3)
Johnson County 7,8 38.6 (31.5, 46.8) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Shelby County 7 38.6 (22.5, 63.8) 4
*
*
Keokuk County 7 40.2 (22.9, 67.8) 3
*
*
Jefferson County 7 40.5 (25.2, 63.2) 5
*
*
Marion County 7 41.0 (29.7, 55.5) 9
*
*
Buchanan County 7,8 41.1 (27.2, 60.1) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.9)
Hancock County 7,8 42.2 (25.3, 68.6) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.6)
Poweshiek County 7,8 42.5 (28.2, 62.5) 6 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.5)
Fayette County 7,8 42.8 (29.9, 60.4) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.4)
Madison County 7,8 43.3 (26.6, 67.2) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.2)
Palo Alto County 7,8 43.5 (24.6, 73.9) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.2)
Sac County 7,8 43.7 (26.4, 71.3) 4 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.3, -0.5)
Grundy County 7 44.8 (28.0, 69.8) 5
*
*
Allamakee County 7 45.0 (27.3, 70.8) 4
*
*
Clay County 7,8 45.3 (29.0, 68.2) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.6)
Chickasaw County 7 45.5 (28.4, 71.2) 5
*
*
Carroll County 7,8 46.1 (32.2, 64.9) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.7)
Story County 7,8 46.6 (37.4, 57.4) 19 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 4.7)
Winnebago County 7 47.0 (27.2, 77.2) 4
*
*
Adair County 7 48.1 (26.6, 84.0) 3
*
*
Jasper County 7,8 48.8 (37.4, 62.9) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Montgomery County 7,8 48.9 (30.2, 77.4) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.1)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 49.3 (39.3, 61.5) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Hamilton County 7,8 50.5 (33.5, 74.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Decatur County 7 50.6 (28.7, 85.6) 3
*
*
Jones County 7,8 50.8 (35.3, 71.6) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 5.9)
Dallas County 7,8 50.8 (40.2, 63.3) 16 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.1)
Iowa County 7,8 51.4 (34.1, 75.2) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Henry County 7,8 52.0 (36.2, 73.1) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.1)
Emmet County 7 52.0 (30.6, 84.6) 4
*
*
Appanoose County 7,8 52.2 (34.2, 77.9) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.4)
Tama County 7,8 52.6 (36.7, 74.1) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Guthrie County 7,8 52.9 (33.5, 82.0) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.3)
Clinton County 7,8 53.2 (42.7, 65.8) 18 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Dubuque County 7,8 53.8 (45.8, 62.8) 33 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Hardin County 7,8 54.2 (37.7, 76.7) 8 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.3)
Dickinson County 7,8 54.4 (38.4, 76.6) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Marshall County 7,8 55.6 (43.7, 70.0) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Washington County 7,8 55.6 (40.0, 75.9) 9 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.0)
Muscatine County 7,8 56.0 (43.7, 70.9) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Linn County 7,8 57.2 (51.4, 63.6) 72 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.7)
Louisa County 7 57.5 (35.8, 88.8) 4
*
*
Lee County 7,8 57.9 (45.3, 73.2) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Wright County 7,8 57.9 (38.0, 86.0) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 6.3)
Delaware County 7,8 58.6 (40.2, 83.3) 7 stable stable trend -26.0 (-53.8, 18.6)
Floyd County 7,8 59.3 (40.5, 84.7) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.7)
Benton County 7,8 59.6 (43.8, 79.5) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Wapello County 7,8 60.6 (47.7, 76.4) 15 stable stable trend -7.6 (-17.4, 3.5)
Cass County 7,8 60.7 (40.7, 88.2) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.8)
Boone County 7,8 60.7 (45.5, 79.8) 11 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.5, 4.9)
Jackson County 7,8 62.7 (45.3, 85.5) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Woodbury County 7,8 63.0 (54.2, 72.8) 38 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.2)
Webster County 7,8 63.9 (51.0, 79.4) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Mills County 7,8 64.3 (43.0, 93.2) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.5)
Harrison County 7,8 65.0 (45.2, 91.6) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Scott County 7,8 65.2 (58.1, 72.8) 65 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.5)
Cedar County 7 65.4 (46.7, 89.9) 8
*
*
Mahaska County 7,8 65.4 (47.7, 88.0) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.2)
Black Hawk County 7,8 65.6 (57.8, 74.4) 53 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Warren County 7,8 65.9 (52.9, 81.3) 18 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.3)
Polk County 7,8 66.0 (61.3, 71.1) 149 stable stable trend -6.1 (-14.0, 2.7)
Clarke County 7 68.4 (43.4, 104.5) 5
*
*
Union County 7,8 71.8 (48.8, 103.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 3.9)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 72.4 (62.9, 82.9) 43 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.3)
Des Moines County 7,8 72.5 (59.2, 88.1) 22 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.2)
Fremont County 7,8 72.9 (42.8, 118.5) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.0)
Page County 7,8 74.9 (54.5, 102.0) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.1)
Adams County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winneshiek County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/30/2016 12:26 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top