Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Lung & Bronchus, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 53.6 (52.1, 55.1) 1,064 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.9, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Page County 7,8 74.9 (54.5, 102.0) 10 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.4, 5.1)
Fremont County 7,8 72.9 (42.8, 118.5) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.6, 4.0)
Des Moines County 7,8 72.5 (59.2, 88.1) 22 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.2)
Pottawattamie County 7,8 72.4 (62.9, 82.9) 43 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.5, 2.3)
Union County 7,8 71.8 (48.8, 103.0) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 3.9)
Clarke County 7 68.4 (43.4, 104.5) 5
*
*
Polk County 7,8 66.0 (61.3, 71.1) 149 stable stable trend -6.1 (-14.0, 2.7)
Warren County 7,8 65.9 (52.9, 81.3) 18 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.1, 4.3)
Black Hawk County 7,8 65.6 (57.8, 74.4) 53 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Mahaska County 7,8 65.4 (47.7, 88.0) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.5, 4.2)
Cedar County 7 65.4 (46.7, 89.9) 8
*
*
Scott County 7,8 65.2 (58.1, 72.8) 65 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 1.5)
Harrison County 7,8 65.0 (45.2, 91.6) 7 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Mills County 7,8 64.3 (43.0, 93.2) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.5, 3.5)
Webster County 7,8 63.9 (51.0, 79.4) 18 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Woodbury County 7,8 63.0 (54.2, 72.8) 38 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.3, 3.2)
Jackson County 7,8 62.7 (45.3, 85.5) 9 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.8, 4.0)
Boone County 7,8 60.7 (45.5, 79.8) 11 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.5, 4.9)
Cass County 7,8 60.7 (40.7, 88.2) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.9, 4.8)
Wapello County 7,8 60.6 (47.7, 76.4) 15 stable stable trend -7.6 (-17.4, 3.5)
Benton County 7,8 59.6 (43.8, 79.5) 10 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.3, 3.5)
Floyd County 7,8 59.3 (40.5, 84.7) 7 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.3, 3.7)
Delaware County 7,8 58.6 (40.2, 83.3) 7 stable stable trend -26.0 (-53.8, 18.6)
Wright County 7,8 57.9 (38.0, 86.0) 6 stable stable trend 3.1 (0.0, 6.3)
Lee County 7,8 57.9 (45.3, 73.2) 15 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Louisa County 7 57.5 (35.8, 88.8) 4
*
*
Linn County 7,8 57.2 (51.4, 63.6) 72 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.7)
Muscatine County 7,8 56.0 (43.7, 70.9) 14 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Washington County 7,8 55.6 (40.0, 75.9) 9 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.0)
Marshall County 7,8 55.6 (43.7, 70.0) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Dickinson County 7,8 54.4 (38.4, 76.6) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.4, 3.0)
Hardin County 7,8 54.2 (37.7, 76.7) 8 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.3, 5.3)
Dubuque County 7,8 53.8 (45.8, 62.8) 33 stable stable trend -0.0 (-1.3, 1.3)
Clinton County 7,8 53.2 (42.7, 65.8) 18 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.5, 2.8)
Guthrie County 7,8 52.9 (33.5, 82.0) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.7, 3.3)
Tama County 7,8 52.6 (36.7, 74.1) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.3, 4.0)
Appanoose County 7,8 52.2 (34.2, 77.9) 6 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.3, 3.4)
Emmet County 7 52.0 (30.6, 84.6) 4
*
*
Henry County 7,8 52.0 (36.2, 73.1) 7 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.1, 5.1)
Iowa County 7,8 51.4 (34.1, 75.2) 6 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.1)
Dallas County 7,8 50.8 (40.2, 63.3) 16 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.0, 3.1)
Jones County 7,8 50.8 (35.3, 71.6) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.4, 5.9)
Decatur County 7 50.6 (28.7, 85.6) 3
*
*
Hamilton County 7,8 50.5 (33.5, 74.3) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.5)
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 49.3 (39.3, 61.5) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Montgomery County 7,8 48.9 (30.2, 77.4) 5 stable stable trend 1.0 (-2.0, 4.1)
Jasper County 7,8 48.8 (37.4, 62.9) 13 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.2, 1.2)
Adair County 7 48.1 (26.6, 84.0) 3
*
*
Winnebago County 7 47.0 (27.2, 77.2) 4
*
*
Story County 7,8 46.6 (37.4, 57.4) 19 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.8, 4.7)
Carroll County 7,8 46.1 (32.2, 64.9) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.7)
Chickasaw County 7 45.5 (28.4, 71.2) 5
*
*
Clay County 7,8 45.3 (29.0, 68.2) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.1, 3.6)
Allamakee County 7 45.0 (27.3, 70.8) 4
*
*
Grundy County 7 44.8 (28.0, 69.8) 5
*
*
Sac County 7,8 43.7 (26.4, 71.3) 4 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.3, -0.5)
Palo Alto County 7,8 43.5 (24.6, 73.9) 3 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.2)
Madison County 7,8 43.3 (26.6, 67.2) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-4.0, 4.2)
Fayette County 7,8 42.8 (29.9, 60.4) 7 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.0, 4.4)
Poweshiek County 7,8 42.5 (28.2, 62.5) 6 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.2, 6.5)
Hancock County 7,8 42.2 (25.3, 68.6) 4 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.2, 4.6)
Buchanan County 7,8 41.1 (27.2, 60.1) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.9, 2.9)
Marion County 7 41.0 (29.7, 55.5) 9
*
*
Jefferson County 7 40.5 (25.2, 63.2) 5
*
*
Keokuk County 7 40.2 (22.9, 67.8) 3
*
*
Shelby County 7 38.6 (22.5, 63.8) 4
*
*
Johnson County 7,8 38.6 (31.5, 46.8) 22 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Kossuth County 7,8 37.6 (24.0, 58.2) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.5, 4.3)
Clayton County 7,8 37.5 (24.8, 55.9) 6 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.4, 5.9)
Buena Vista County 7,8 37.2 (23.8, 56.0) 5 stable stable trend -2.5 (-9.2, 4.7)
Monona County 7 36.4 (20.1, 64.6) 3
*
*
Greene County 7 35.7 (20.0, 62.9) 3
*
*
Calhoun County 7 34.7 (18.5, 62.6) 3
*
*
Mitchell County 7,8 33.5 (18.6, 58.5) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 2.1)
Plymouth County 7,8 33.0 (21.6, 48.6) 6 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.8, 5.0)
Bremer County 7,8 30.6 (20.0, 45.5) 5 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.1, 3.2)
O'Brien County 7 28.8 (16.5, 48.6) 3
*
*
Butler County 7,8 25.9 (14.2, 44.8) 3
*
*
Sioux County 7 24.9 (16.0, 37.1) 5
*
*
Adams County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cherokee County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Van Buren County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winneshiek County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County 7
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/27/2016 9:13 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top