Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Iowa by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Melanoma of the Skin, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Iowa 3,8 23.7 (22.9, 24.4) 798 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.3 (2.9, 3.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 19.9 (19.8, 20.0) 65,719 § 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.1)
Plymouth County 7 45.3 (34.1, 58.9) 12 2008-2012 * *
Taylor County 7 42.5 (23.7, 70.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Hancock County 7 41.8 (28.1, 60.5) 6 2008-2012 * *
Kossuth County 7 40.3 (27.5, 57.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Grundy County 7 38.5 (24.8, 57.1) 5 2008-2012 * *
Van Buren County 7 38.1 (21.6, 62.7) 3 2008-2012 * *
Mitchell County 7 38.1 (23.3, 58.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Monona County 7 38.0 (21.9, 61.4) 4 2008-2012 * *
Worth County 7 37.9 (21.3, 62.8) 3 2008-2012 * *
Dubuque County 7,8 36.3 (31.0, 42.1) 36 2008-2012 rising rising trend 13.2 (7.5, 19.1)
Dickinson County 7 35.6 (24.4, 50.4) 8 2008-2012 * *
Jackson County 7 32.7 (23.4, 44.8) 9 2008-2012 * *
Winneshiek County 7 32.6 (21.9, 46.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Iowa County 7 31.9 (20.4, 47.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Winnebago County 7 31.6 (18.9, 50.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Clinton County 7,8 31.4 (25.1, 38.8) 18 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.9, 5.2)
Calhoun County 7 29.9 (17.7, 48.0) 4 2008-2012 * *
Benton County 7 29.4 (21.0, 40.2) 8 2008-2012 * *
Delaware County 7,8 29.4 (19.6, 42.6) 6 2008-2012 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.1, 7.4)
Greene County 7 29.3 (17.1, 47.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Floyd County 7 29.1 (19.4, 42.3) 6 2008-2012 * *
Howard County 7 28.4 (16.2, 46.8) 3 2008-2012 * *
Hamilton County 7,8 28.3 (18.7, 41.4) 6 2008-2012 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.1, 10.4)
Wright County 7,8 27.9 (17.5, 42.6) 5 2008-2012 stable stable trend -19.2 (-54.5, 43.5)
Allamakee County 7 27.9 (17.6, 42.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Sioux County 7,8 27.8 (20.4, 36.9) 10 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.4, 6.6)
Chickasaw County 7 27.7 (16.6, 43.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Emmet County 7 27.6 (15.3, 46.0) 3 2008-2012 * *
Woodbury County 7,8 27.4 (23.0, 32.5) 28 2008-2012 rising rising trend 5.2 (3.7, 6.7)
Cedar County 7 27.3 (18.1, 39.6) 6 2008-2012 * *
Bremer County 7,8 27.3 (19.3, 37.6) 8 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.1 (-0.3, 4.5)
Scott County 7,8 27.1 (23.7, 30.8) 48 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.8 (2.2, 5.5)
Carroll County 7 26.4 (17.1, 38.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
O'Brien County 7,8 26.3 (15.8, 41.2) 5 2008-2012 rising rising trend 5.4 (2.2, 8.7)
Muscatine County 7,8 26.2 (20.0, 33.7) 13 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.5 (1.0, 6.0)
Johnson County 7,8 25.9 (21.8, 30.6) 31 2008-2012 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.3, 3.5)
Palo Alto County 7 25.5 (14.4, 42.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Page County 7 25.0 (15.9, 37.7) 5 2008-2012 * *
Appanoose County 7 24.9 (14.7, 39.8) 4 2008-2012 * *
Linn County 7,8 24.9 (22.0, 28.1) 55 2008-2012 rising rising trend 10.6 (3.7, 17.9)
Washington County 7,8 24.7 (16.6, 35.4) 6 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.7, 5.7)
Mills County 7 24.4 (15.0, 37.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Des Moines County 7,8 24.3 (18.3, 31.8) 12 2008-2012 rising rising trend 28.6 (1.7, 62.5)
Marshall County 7,8 24.2 (18.4, 31.5) 12 2008-2012 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.2, 5.7)
Mahaska County 7 24.2 (16.1, 34.9) 6 2008-2012 * *
Cerro Gordo County 7,8 24.2 (18.4, 31.3) 13 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.1, 5.5)
Black Hawk County 7,8 23.7 (20.1, 27.8) 33 2008-2012 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.5, 3.6)
Story County 7,8 23.5 (18.6, 29.1) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.7)
Dallas County 7,8 22.9 (17.9, 29.0) 14 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.9)
Lee County 7,8 22.9 (16.8, 30.5) 10 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.1, 5.0)
Webster County 7,8 22.4 (16.5, 29.8) 10 2008-2012 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.3)
Harrison County 7,8 21.7 (12.7, 34.8) 4 2008-2012 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.0, 7.7)
Butler County 7 21.3 (12.8, 33.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Union County 7 21.2 (12.2, 34.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Jones County 7,8 20.6 (13.2, 30.7) 5 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.9, 2.1)
Marion County 7,8 20.3 (14.4, 28.0) 8 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.2, 6.7)
Wapello County 7,8 20.3 (14.5, 27.7) 8 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.1, 5.0)
Buchanan County 7 20.1 (12.8, 30.2) 5 2008-2012 * *
Boone County 7,8 20.1 (13.4, 29.0) 6 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.7, 5.7)
Fayette County 7,8 19.9 (13.0, 29.6) 6 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.9, 4.6)
Cass County 7 19.6 (11.2, 32.2) 4 2008-2012 * *
Henry County 7,8 19.5 (12.2, 29.6) 5 2008-2012 rising rising trend 3.3 (0.4, 6.4)
Clayton County 7 19.3 (11.2, 30.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Warren County 7,8 19.0 (13.8, 25.6) 9 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.0, 2.9)
Polk County 7,8 17.9 (16.1, 19.8) 75 2008-2012 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.9, 2.8)
Tama County 7 17.6 (10.3, 28.1) 4 2008-2012 * *
Shelby County 7 17.2 (9.8, 29.1) 3 2008-2012 * *
Pottawattamie County 7,8 17.0 (13.5, 21.2) 17 2008-2012 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.5, 4.5)
Clay County 7 15.4 (8.7, 25.6) 3 2008-2012 * *
Buena Vista County 7 15.3 (8.9, 24.6) 4 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson County 7,8 15.0 (8.4, 25.3) 3 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.1, 5.2)
Poweshiek County 7 14.1 (8.3, 22.9) 4 2008-2012 * *
Jasper County 7,8 14.0 (9.4, 20.1) 6 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.4, 2.1)
Adair County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Adams County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Audubon County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Cherokee County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Clarke County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Crawford County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Davis County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Decatur County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Franklin County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Fremont County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Guthrie County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Hardin County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Humboldt County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ida County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Keokuk County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Louisa County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lucas County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Lyon County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Madison County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Monroe County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Montgomery County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Osceola County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Pocahontas County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Ringgold County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Sac County 7,8
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Wayne County 7
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/28/2015 9:19 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top