Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Cancer Sites, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Louisiana 3 485.6 (482.8, 488.5) 23,244 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 453.8 (453.5, 454.1) 1,526,274 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Acadia Parish 7,9 492.7 (468.7, 517.7) 323 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-8.8, 9.1)
Allen Parish 7,9 450.0 (414.7, 487.5) 123 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.8 (-6.4, 17.3)
Ascension Parish 7,9 484.5 (463.9, 505.7) 455 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Assumption Parish 7,9 450.6 (414.5, 489.1) 120 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-11.9, 7.4)
Avoyelles Parish 7,9 501.8 (473.5, 531.3) 242 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.9, 7.3)
Beauregard Parish 7,9 463.7 (433.1, 495.9) 178 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-12.4, 9.6)
Bienville Parish 7,9 508.0 (463.1, 556.4) 98 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.9 (-11.4, 10.9)
Bossier Parish 7,9 490.9 (473.0, 509.2) 583 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.0, 1.1)
Caddo Parish 7,9 492.8 (481.2, 504.7) 1,401 2008-2012 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Calcasieu Parish 7,9 490.4 (476.7, 504.3) 1,006 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.5, -2.2)
Caldwell Parish 7,9 467.6 (413.8, 526.7) 57 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.9 (-14.4, 10.1)
Cameron Parish 7,9 509.4 (438.5, 588.8) 39 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-18.3, 24.3)
Catahoula Parish 7,9 504.4 (449.5, 564.5) 63 2008-2012 stable stable trend 12.0 (-0.9, 26.7)
Claiborne Parish 7,9 473.5 (432.9, 517.1) 102 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.1 (-8.3, 9.3)
Concordia Parish 7,9 480.4 (441.7, 521.8) 116 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-9.0, 9.5)
De Soto Parish 7,9 503.8 (468.8, 540.7) 161 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.3, 1.0)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 487.1 (477.6, 496.8) 2,082 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.7, 1.9)
East Carroll Parish 7,9 512.7 (444.3, 588.8) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.7 (-12.5, 18.3)
East Feliciana Parish 7,9 570.8 (526.9, 617.4) 135 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-10.4, 8.7)
Evangeline Parish 7,9 459.2 (428.4, 491.6) 169 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.0 (-6.0, 15.0)
Franklin Parish 7,9 479.6 (441.9, 519.9) 124 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.9 (-18.3, 17.8)
Grant Parish 7,9 482.7 (442.6, 525.5) 111 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.0 (-16.1, 16.8)
Iberia Parish 7,9 515.4 (492.6, 539.0) 394 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.1, 4.0)
Iberville Parish 7,9 586.2 (550.7, 623.5) 211 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-10.0, 9.4)
Jackson Parish 7,9 518.6 (474.2, 566.2) 105 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.4 (-12.8, 0.4)
Jefferson Davis Parish 7,9 499.6 (467.0, 534.0) 179 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.8 (-10.2, 7.4)
Jefferson Parish 7,9 473.9 (465.2, 482.7) 2,350 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.9, 5.6)
La Salle Parish 7,9 464.8 (420.0, 513.3) 81 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-16.5, 10.0)
LaFourche Parish 7,9 467.5 (448.7, 486.8) 478 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-4.0, 5.8)
Lafayette Parish 7,9 487.3 (473.7, 501.1) 1,015 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.1, 4.1)
Lincoln Parish 7,9 436.3 (408.4, 465.6) 188 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-11.7, 11.5)
Livingston Parish 7,9 494.6 (476.4, 513.4) 594 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.1, -0.7)
Madison Parish 7,9 379.0 (331.3, 431.7) 47 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.1 (-14.4, 7.3)
Morehouse Parish 7,9 457.3 (425.1, 491.4) 155 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.8 (-5.8, 7.9)
Natchitoches Parish 7,9 447.2 (418.6, 477.4) 189 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.3, 5.9)
Orleans Parish 7,9 466.0 (455.6, 476.6) 1,619 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.6, 3.1)
Ouachita Parish 7,9 480.9 (465.6, 496.6) 760 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.9, 0.9)
Plaquemines Parish 7,9 458.7 (419.9, 500.1) 106 2008-2012 rising rising trend 9.6 (0.3, 19.7)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7,9 507.4 (470.2, 547.0) 146 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.0 (-12.3, -3.4)
Rapides Parish 7,9 484.9 (468.8, 501.4) 707 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.6, 5.2)
Red River Parish 7,9 431.7 (376.5, 493.0) 46 2008-2012 stable stable trend -5.4 (-21.9, 14.5)
Richland Parish 7,9 456.4 (418.5, 497.0) 110 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.3 (-6.0, 9.2)
Sabine Parish 7,9 500.4 (465.0, 537.9) 157 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-8.7, 10.3)
St. Bernard Parish 7,9 516.9 (481.5, 554.2) 168 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.9, -0.5)
St. Charles Parish 7,9 470.8 (443.7, 499.2) 238 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.5, 9.6)
St. Helena Parish 7,9 461.5 (409.5, 518.4) 61 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.9 (-19.2, 14.3)
St. James Parish 7,9 497.4 (457.7, 539.8) 120 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.7 (-10.5, 10.1)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7,9 460.8 (432.3, 490.7) 209 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.2 (-9.4, 5.6)
St. Landry Parish 7,9 530.4 (509.4, 552.0) 497 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.1, 5.1)
St. Martin Parish 7,9 499.7 (472.9, 527.7) 272 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.2 (-11.0, 17.3)
St. Mary Parish 7,9 474.0 (449.2, 499.8) 282 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-7.4, 8.6)
St. Tammany Parish 7,9 494.5 (482.1, 507.1) 1,273 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.6)
Tangipahoa Parish 7,9 489.9 (472.1, 508.3) 599 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.8, 6.0)
Tensas Parish 7,9 389.0 (323.4, 465.0) 27 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.7 (-18.7, 7.1)
Terrebonne Parish 7,9 493.1 (474.4, 512.2) 549 2008-2012 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.2, 5.6)
Union Parish 7,9 463.9 (428.6, 501.6) 134 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.5 (-10.9, 6.7)
Vermilion Parish 7,9 529.1 (503.5, 555.6) 328 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-9.4, 9.1)
Vernon Parish 7,9 478.1 (448.7, 508.9) 207 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.6 (-15.3, 16.6)
Washington Parish 7,9 536.6 (509.1, 565.3) 296 2008-2012 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.5, -0.9)
Webster Parish 7,9 485.3 (458.6, 513.2) 256 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.0 (-6.8, 7.2)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 526.7 (485.4, 570.6) 126 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.7 (-6.5, 15.0)
West Carroll Parish 7,9 443.2 (395.6, 495.2) 65 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.9 (-5.0, 9.2)
West Feliciana Parish 7,9 429.0 (383.2, 479.0) 73 2008-2012 stable stable trend 7.4 (-15.3, 36.1)
Winn Parish 7,9 524.4 (477.6, 574.6) 96 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.4 (-14.9, 7.4)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/29/2015 7:31 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top