Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countdescending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Louisiana 3,9 50.2 (49.2, 51.1) 2,384 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.5, 0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
West Feliciana Parish 7,9 34.8 (21.9, 52.5) 5
*
*
St. Charles Parish 7,9 40.5 (32.7, 49.6) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-22.1, 24.0)
Ascension Parish 7,9 40.8 (35.0, 47.4) 38 stable stable trend -3.0 (-9.6, 4.1)
Morehouse Parish 7,9 41.3 (32.4, 52.2) 15 stable stable trend -1.5 (-34.6, 48.4)
Vernon Parish 7,9 41.7 (33.3, 51.4) 18 stable stable trend -6.0 (-26.1, 19.6)
Caldwell Parish 7,9 42.3 (27.0, 63.3) 5
*
*
Red River Parish 7,9 43.1 (26.9, 65.7) 5
*
*
Beauregard Parish 7,9 43.3 (34.3, 54.0) 17 stable stable trend -15.8 (-39.9, 17.9)
Bossier Parish 7,9 43.4 (38.2, 49.1) 51 stable stable trend -6.4 (-20.3, 10.0)
Plaquemines Parish 7,9 44.1 (32.7, 58.1) 10
*
*
Lincoln Parish 7,9 44.2 (35.7, 54.2) 19 falling falling trend -14.1 (-25.4, -1.1)
St. Tammany Parish 7,9 44.3 (40.6, 48.2) 112 stable stable trend -2.6 (-9.2, 4.4)
La Salle Parish 7,9 45.7 (32.4, 63.0) 8
*
*
West Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 46.1 (34.6, 60.3) 11
*
*
Tensas Parish 7,9 46.2 (26.1, 77.2) 3
*
*
Jefferson Parish 7,9 46.5 (43.8, 49.3) 231 falling falling trend -6.0 (-9.0, -2.8)
LaFourche Parish 7,9 46.6 (40.8, 53.0) 47 stable stable trend -1.8 (-10.8, 8.0)
East Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 47.0 (44.0, 50.0) 197 stable stable trend -5.3 (-11.4, 1.2)
Webster Parish 7,9 47.2 (39.3, 56.4) 25 stable stable trend -0.5 (-16.9, 19.2)
Orleans Parish 7,9 47.2 (43.9, 50.7) 162 stable stable trend -2.7 (-8.3, 3.3)
Ouachita Parish 7,9 47.3 (42.6, 52.4) 76 stable stable trend -4.4 (-18.3, 11.8)
Rapides Parish 7,9 47.9 (42.9, 53.3) 70 stable stable trend 3.1 (-12.1, 21.0)
Livingston Parish 7,9 49.1 (43.4, 55.2) 58 stable stable trend -1.4 (-18.8, 19.8)
Caddo Parish 7,9 49.3 (45.7, 53.2) 140 stable stable trend 1.2 (-5.0, 7.9)
Washington Parish 7,9 50.2 (42.2, 59.4) 28 stable stable trend -16.3 (-32.9, 4.6)
Terrebonne Parish 7,9 50.3 (44.4, 56.7) 56 rising rising trend 6.7 (4.9, 8.5)
Calcasieu Parish 7,9 50.8 (46.5, 55.5) 104 stable stable trend -3.1 (-12.1, 6.9)
Jackson Parish 7,9 51.3 (38.3, 67.6) 11
*
*
Lafayette Parish 7,9 52.0 (47.6, 56.7) 107 stable stable trend 2.2 (-8.9, 14.8)
Franklin Parish 7,9 52.6 (40.9, 66.9) 14
*
*
Tangipahoa Parish 7,9 53.4 (47.6, 59.7) 65 stable stable trend -0.4 (-9.9, 10.1)
St. John the Baptist Parish 7,9 53.5 (44.0, 64.5) 24 stable stable trend 4.4 (-12.6, 24.8)
Natchitoches Parish 7,9 54.1 (44.5, 65.2) 23 stable stable trend -6.0 (-32.3, 30.7)
Cameron Parish 7,9 54.3 (32.7, 85.2) 4
*
*
Jefferson Davis Parish 7,9 54.6 (44.2, 66.8) 20 stable stable trend 7.3 (-4.9, 21.0)
Richland Parish 7,9 55.0 (42.5, 70.2) 13
*
*
De Soto Parish 7,9 55.5 (44.3, 68.8) 17 stable stable trend -7.9 (-18.2, 3.8)
St. Bernard Parish 7,9 56.1 (44.6, 69.6) 17 stable stable trend 3.4 (-22.8, 38.5)
West Carroll Parish 7,9 56.3 (40.3, 76.9) 8
*
*
Grant Parish 7,9 56.5 (43.5, 72.2) 13
*
*
Allen Parish 7,9 56.6 (44.5, 70.9) 15 stable stable trend 11.4 (-4.0, 29.3)
St. Mary Parish 7,9 56.7 (48.3, 66.1) 34 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.4, 4.7)
Claiborne Parish 7,9 57.0 (43.4, 73.7) 12
*
*
Assumption Parish 7,9 57.4 (44.7, 72.6) 14
*
*
Madison Parish 7,9 57.9 (40.0, 80.9) 7
*
*
Vermilion Parish 7,9 58.2 (49.9, 67.4) 36 stable stable trend 2.0 (-7.1, 12.0)
Bienville Parish 7,9 58.4 (44.4, 76.0) 12
*
*
Sabine Parish 7,9 59.3 (47.7, 73.1) 19 stable stable trend -0.4 (-23.8, 30.1)
Acadia Parish 7,9 59.5 (51.4, 68.6) 39 stable stable trend 1.5 (-12.2, 17.4)
St. Landry Parish 7,9 59.9 (53.1, 67.5) 57 stable stable trend 2.7 (-18.3, 29.2)
Pointe Coupee Parish 7,9 60.2 (47.8, 75.0) 17 stable stable trend -7.1 (-25.1, 15.3)
Winn Parish 7,9 60.5 (45.1, 79.6) 11
*
*
Evangeline Parish 7,9 61.0 (50.1, 73.7) 22 stable stable trend 8.5 (-14.9, 38.2)
Iberia Parish 7,9 61.4 (53.7, 70.0) 46 stable stable trend -1.3 (-15.0, 14.7)
Concordia Parish 7,9 61.9 (48.3, 78.3) 15 stable stable trend 4.9 (-7.8, 19.3)
Avoyelles Parish 7,9 62.5 (52.8, 73.4) 30 stable stable trend 11.1 (-4.3, 29.0)
St. Martin Parish 7,9 62.5 (53.1, 73.1) 33 stable stable trend -4.9 (-30.8, 30.7)
Iberville Parish 7,9 62.8 (51.5, 76.0) 22 stable stable trend 4.6 (-9.6, 21.1)
Union Parish 7,9 63.8 (50.9, 79.1) 18 stable stable trend -9.8 (-39.8, 35.3)
St. James Parish 7,9 66.6 (52.5, 83.3) 16 stable stable trend -5.5 (-27.6, 23.5)
St. Helena Parish 7,9 68.1 (48.8, 92.7) 9
*
*
Catahoula Parish 7,9 70.4 (50.7, 95.5) 9
*
*
East Feliciana Parish 7,9 71.7 (56.6, 89.7) 17 stable stable trend 3.0 (-26.3, 44.0)
East Carroll Parish 7,9 76.5 (51.9, 108.9) 6
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/01/2016 4:01 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top