Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Louisiana by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
sort sort alphabetically by namedescending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Louisiana 3 56.0 (54.7, 57.3) 1,471 2008-2012 * *
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 54.1 (53.9, 54.2) 99,801 § 2008-2012 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.5)
Acadia Parish 7,9 67.4 (55.8, 80.6) 24 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.1 (-16.3, 24.4)
Allen Parish 7,9 50.0 (34.9, 69.8) 7 2008-2012 * *
Ascension Parish 7,9 60.0 (50.4, 71.0) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend -9.8 (-19.7, 1.3)
Assumption Parish 7,9 56.8 (39.9, 78.6) 8 2008-2012 * *
Avoyelles Parish 7,9 56.6 (44.3, 71.4) 15 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.6 (-10.2, 14.9)
Beauregard Parish 7,9 59.3 (45.1, 76.7) 12 2008-2012 * *
Bienville Parish 7,9 68.0 (47.5, 95.5) 7 2008-2012 * *
Bossier Parish 7,9 66.2 (57.6, 75.7) 43 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.4 (-16.5, 14.1)
Caddo Parish 7,9 48.8 (44.0, 53.9) 79 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.1, 4.8)
Calcasieu Parish 7,9 56.1 (50.0, 62.7) 63 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.2 (-16.7, 10.1)
Caldwell Parish 7,9 80.0 (51.8, 119.3) 5 2008-2012 * *
Cameron Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Catahoula Parish 7,9 57.8 (35.1, 91.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
Claiborne Parish 7,9 33.3 (19.8, 53.7) 4 2008-2012 * *
Concordia Parish 7,9 57.9 (41.0, 80.0) 8 2008-2012 * *
De Soto Parish 7,9 58.3 (43.5, 77.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
East Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 43.6 (39.8, 47.5) 104 2008-2012 stable stable trend -6.6 (-13.0, 0.2)
East Carroll Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
East Feliciana Parish 7,9 61.2 (42.4, 86.0) 7 2008-2012 * *
Evangeline Parish 7,9 51.8 (38.9, 68.0) 11 2008-2012 * *
Franklin Parish 7,9 52.3 (36.7, 72.8) 8 2008-2012 * *
Grant Parish 7,9 74.6 (54.2, 100.7) 9 2008-2012 * *
Iberia Parish 7,9 70.6 (59.5, 83.1) 29 2008-2012 stable stable trend -8.6 (-25.6, 12.4)
Iberville Parish 7,9 60.7 (45.9, 79.1) 11 2008-2012 * *
Jackson Parish 7,9 58.9 (40.6, 83.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson Davis Parish 7,9 66.5 (51.5, 84.7) 14 2008-2012 * *
Jefferson Parish 7,9 58.4 (54.4, 62.7) 163 2008-2012 stable stable trend 0.3 (-10.7, 12.6)
La Salle Parish 7,9 71.6 (49.8, 100.7) 7 2008-2012 * *
LaFourche Parish 7,9 59.6 (50.7, 69.6) 33 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-28.3, 33.6)
Lafayette Parish 7,9 59.1 (52.8, 65.8) 66 2008-2012 stable stable trend 5.8 (-2.8, 15.3)
Lincoln Parish 7,9 51.0 (38.8, 65.9) 12 2008-2012 * *
Livingston Parish 7,9 58.9 (50.6, 68.2) 37 2008-2012 stable stable trend 3.1 (-16.6, 27.6)
Madison Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Morehouse Parish 7,9 57.1 (42.7, 75.3) 11 2008-2012 * *
Natchitoches Parish 7,9 42.8 (31.6, 56.7) 10 2008-2012 * *
Orleans Parish 7,9 50.8 (46.3, 55.6) 96 2008-2012 stable stable trend -4.5 (-13.9, 6.0)
Ouachita Parish 7,9 56.9 (50.0, 64.4) 51 2008-2012 stable stable trend -2.1 (-17.8, 16.7)
Plaquemines Parish 7,9 61.2 (42.9, 84.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
Pointe Coupee Parish 7,9 50.8 (36.5, 69.5) 8 2008-2012 * *
Rapides Parish 7,9 51.6 (44.7, 59.2) 41 2008-2012 stable stable trend 8.4 (-9.7, 30.0)
Red River Parish 7,9 51.9 (29.5, 86.1) 3 2008-2012 * *
Richland Parish 7,9 64.4 (46.5, 87.3) 9 2008-2012 * *
Sabine Parish 7,9 68.0 (51.5, 88.6) 12 2008-2012 * *
St. Bernard Parish 7,9 83.7 (64.7, 106.4) 14 2008-2012 * *
St. Charles Parish 7,9 63.6 (50.4, 79.2) 16 2008-2012 stable stable trend -10.8 (-22.1, 2.2)
St. Helena Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
St. James Parish 7,9 34.3 (21.6, 52.0) 5 2008-2012 * *
St. John the Baptist Parish 7,9 39.2 (28.1, 53.0) 9 2008-2012 * *
St. Landry Parish 7,9 69.9 (59.9, 81.0) 36 2008-2012 stable stable trend -0.2 (-16.4, 19.1)
St. Martin Parish 7,9 59.7 (47.6, 74.0) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -1.4 (-29.9, 38.8)
St. Mary Parish 7,9 52.6 (41.9, 65.2) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend -13.0 (-32.6, 12.3)
St. Tammany Parish 7,9 57.3 (51.7, 63.3) 80 2008-2012 stable stable trend 1.0 (-4.1, 6.5)
Tangipahoa Parish 7,9 54.6 (46.9, 63.2) 37 2008-2012 stable stable trend -3.3 (-13.5, 8.1)
Tensas Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Terrebonne Parish 7,9 60.0 (51.4, 69.7) 35 2008-2012 stable stable trend 9.5 (-6.6, 28.2)
Union Parish 7,9 64.4 (48.0, 85.2) 10 2008-2012 * *
Vermilion Parish 7,9 63.7 (52.2, 77.1) 22 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.7 (-9.2, 16.1)
Vernon Parish 7,9 79.3 (63.7, 97.5) 18 2008-2012 stable stable trend 4.4 (-24.8, 44.9)
Washington Parish 7,9 68.2 (55.5, 83.2) 21 2008-2012 falling falling trend -8.5 (-14.9, -1.5)
Webster Parish 7,9 57.0 (45.3, 71.1) 17 2008-2012 stable stable trend 2.7 (-15.4, 24.7)
West Baton Rouge Parish 7,9 49.2 (33.7, 69.6) 7 2008-2012 * *
West Carroll Parish 7,9 52.7 (32.2, 82.5) 4 2008-2012 * *
West Feliciana Parish 7,9
*
3 or fewer
2008-2012 * *
Winn Parish 7,9 64.6 (43.5, 93.1) 6 2008-2012 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/03/2015 11:20 pm.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
3 Source: SEER November 2014 submission. State Cancer Registry also receives funding from CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
9 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top