Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for by County

Colon & Rectum, 2008-2012

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by ratedescending
Average Annual Count
sort sort by countascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Michigan 5,10 40.7 # (40.2, 41.3) 4,596 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.1, -3.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 41.9 (41.8, 42.0) 140,433 § falling falling trend -3.9 (-4.7, -3.0)
Wayne County 7,8 47.7 (46.3, 49.1) 942 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.0, -2.4)
Oakland County 7,8 39.9 (38.4, 41.4) 550 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Macomb County 7,8 43.6 (41.8, 45.5) 432 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Kent County 6,10 37.5 # (35.3, 39.8) 222 stable stable trend -5.7 (-12.2, 1.3)
Genesee County 6,10 41.9 # (39.3, 44.6) 200 stable stable trend -5.2 (-13.8, 4.4)
Washtenaw County 6,10 38.5 # (35.4, 41.8) 120 falling falling trend -12.0 (-14.6, -9.3)
Saginaw County 6,10 44.9 # (41.2, 48.9) 112 stable stable trend -14.7 (-27.9, 1.0)
Ingham County 6,10 41.6 # (38.1, 45.4) 108 stable stable trend -2.8 (-13.2, 8.9)
Kalamazoo County 6,10 37.5 # (34.1, 41.0) 97 stable stable trend -4.2 (-10.4, 2.5)
St. Clair County 6,10 48.4 # (44.1, 53.1) 94 falling falling trend -8.1 (-14.7, -1.1)
Berrien County 6,10 45.8 # (41.7, 50.3) 92 stable stable trend -5.3 (-18.9, 10.6)
Ottawa County 6,10 35.5 # (32.3, 39.0) 91 stable stable trend -2.4 (-14.3, 11.2)
Muskegon County 6,10 39.4 # (35.5, 43.7) 76 stable stable trend -6.4 (-13.4, 1.1)
Livingston County 6,10 38.9 # (34.9, 43.2) 75 stable stable trend -2.4 (-17.4, 15.3)
Jackson County 6,10 37.7 # (33.8, 41.9) 71 stable stable trend -4.1 (-16.4, 10.0)
Monroe County 6,10 34.6 # (30.7, 38.9) 60 falling falling trend -10.8 (-16.9, -4.3)
Calhoun County 6,10 36.4 # (32.3, 40.9) 59 stable stable trend -11.0 (-27.5, 9.2)
Bay County 6,10 41.0 # (36.3, 46.2) 57 stable stable trend -7.1 (-17.9, 5.2)
Lenawee County 6,10 40.5 # (35.5, 45.9) 50 stable stable trend 3.7 (-14.0, 24.9)
Grand Traverse County 6,10 43.0 # (37.5, 49.1) 46 stable stable trend -4.1 (-18.4, 12.7)
Lapeer County 6,10 45.1 # (39.2, 51.6) 45 stable stable trend 2.7 (-13.5, 21.9)
Allegan County 6,10 32.8 # (28.4, 37.6) 41 stable stable trend -2.8 (-15.0, 11.1)
Eaton County 6,10 30.3 # (26.0, 35.0) 38 stable stable trend -13.8 (-32.9, 10.8)
Shiawassee County 6,10 44.6 # (38.3, 51.7) 37 stable stable trend -8.5 (-27.0, 14.6)
Midland County 6,10 34.9 # (29.8, 40.6) 35 stable stable trend -3.0 (-26.9, 28.7)
Van Buren County 6,10 40.5 # (34.6, 47.1) 35 stable stable trend -2.7 (-11.9, 7.5)
Tuscola County 6,10 49.4 # (42.2, 57.6) 34 falling falling trend -12.9 (-17.8, -7.7)
St. Joseph County 6,10 39.7 # (33.5, 46.8) 29 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.0, 2.4)
Gratiot County 6,10 56.8 # (47.7, 67.3) 28 stable stable trend -9.2 (-24.0, 8.5)
Isabella County 6,10 45.7 # (38.1, 54.4) 27 stable stable trend -12.7 (-31.7, 11.7)
Marquette County 6,10 32.0 # (26.6, 38.3) 26 stable stable trend -9.1 (-37.1, 31.4)
Montcalm County 6,10 34.6 # (28.8, 41.3) 25 falling falling trend -11.1 (-19.2, -2.3)
Ionia County 6,10 40.0 # (33.2, 47.8) 25 falling falling trend -16.2 (-28.7, -1.6)
Huron County 6,10 44.9 # (37.1, 54.1) 24 stable stable trend -11.1 (-21.6, 0.7)
Sanilac County 6,10 41.2 # (34.0, 49.6) 24 stable stable trend -6.7 (-16.7, 4.6)
Alpena County 6,10 50.1 # (41.0, 61.0) 22 stable stable trend 0.3 (-21.4, 28.1)
Newaygo County 6,10 35.5 # (29.0, 43.1) 21 stable stable trend 10.5 (-30.8, 76.3)
Branch County 6,10 38.7 # (31.6, 47.1) 21 stable stable trend -12.5 (-32.8, 13.8)
Iosco County 6,10 45.2 # (35.9, 56.7) 20 stable stable trend 2.4 (-32.9, 56.2)
Cass County 6,10 29.2 # (23.6, 35.8) 20 stable stable trend 7.3 (-28.3, 60.6)
Hillsdale County 6,10 33.8 # (27.3, 41.5) 19 stable stable trend -4.1 (-31.9, 35.1)
Roscommon County 6,10 40.1 # (32.1, 50.3) 19 stable stable trend -7.6 (-45.0, 55.1)
Clinton County 6,10 22.1 # (17.8, 27.1) 19 stable stable trend -10.5 (-29.9, 14.2)
Delta County 6,10 33.0 # (26.2, 41.1) 18 rising rising trend 12.5 (2.7, 23.1)
Wexford County 6,10 43.2 # (34.4, 53.7) 17 stable stable trend 15.2 (-17.1, 60.0)
Clare County 6,10 37.7 # (30.0, 47.1) 17 stable stable trend -2.0 (-32.9, 43.0)
Emmet County 6,10 36.6 # (29.1, 45.6) 17 stable stable trend 9.0 (-2.5, 21.9)
Gladwin County 6,10 40.0 # (31.5, 50.4) 17 stable stable trend -12.0 (-37.0, 22.9)
Houghton County 6,10 37.9 # (29.9, 47.5) 16 stable stable trend -0.3 (-16.5, 19.0)
Manistee County 6,10 41.3 # (32.4, 52.2) 16 stable stable trend 4.0 (-24.2, 42.6)
Charlevoix County 6,10 41.6 # (32.7, 52.5) 16 stable stable trend -2.0 (-29.3, 35.8)
Mecosta County 6,10 30.2 # (23.8, 38.0) 16 stable stable trend -11.9 (-41.9, 33.6)
Osceola County 6,10 50.4 # (39.6, 63.5) 15 stable stable trend -4.4 (-26.6, 24.5)
Barry County 6,10 20.5 # (16.0, 26.0) 14
*
*
Cheboygan County 6,10 37.0 # (28.4, 47.8) 14
*
*
Oceana County 6,10 38.9 # (30.1, 49.7) 14
*
*
Chippewa County 6,10 28.7 # (22.2, 36.6) 13
*
*
Antrim County 6,10 32.3 # (24.6, 42.1) 12
*
*
Otsego County 6,10 37.1 # (28.3, 47.9) 12
*
*
Ogemaw County 6,10 35.6 # (26.8, 46.8) 12
*
*
Menominee County 6,10 31.0 # (23.6, 40.5) 12
*
*
Dickinson County 6,10 31.0 # (23.4, 40.5) 12
*
*
Leelanau County 6,10 30.7 # (22.5, 41.4) 11
*
*
Mason County 6,10 28.2 # (21.2, 37.0) 11
*
*
Benzie County 6,10 38.9 # (28.6, 52.1) 10
*
*
Kalkaska County 6,10 44.6 # (32.7, 59.6) 10
*
*
Presque Isle County 6,10 38.0 # (27.6, 52.4) 10
*
*
Alcona County 6,10 35.8 # (25.2, 51.9) 9
*
*
Gogebic County 6,10 32.4 # (23.0, 45.1) 8
*
*
Mackinac County 6,10 42.7 # (30.3, 59.8) 8
*
*
Montmorency County 6,10 41.6 # (28.9, 60.2) 8
*
*
Oscoda County 6,10 46.4 # (31.7, 67.4) 7
*
*
Arenac County 6,10 27.4 # (18.9, 39.2) 7
*
*
Crawford County 6,10 28.9 # (19.8, 41.7) 7
*
*
Schoolcraft County 6,10 50.6 # (34.1, 73.8) 7
*
*
Iron County 6,10 24.1 # (16.2, 36.5) 6
*
*
Missaukee County 6,10 28.0 # (18.5, 41.1) 6
*
*
Ontonagon County 6,10 46.5 # (30.0, 72.3) 6
*
*
Lake County 6,10 27.2 # (17.4, 42.0) 5
*
*
Alger County 6,10 32.3 # (20.1, 50.6) 5
*
*
Baraga County 6,10 42.0 # (26.3, 64.3) 5
*
*
Luce County 6,10 35.3 # (20.1, 59.2) 3
*
*
Keweenaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/28/2016 9:22 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2015 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2014 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission and SEER November 2014 submission.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) November 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2014 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2014 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with NPCR November 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.


Return to Top