Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Michigan by County

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Lung & Bronchus, All Ages
Sorted by Rate
County
sort sort alphabetically by nameascending
Annual Incidence Rate
over rate period
(95% Confidence Interval)

sort sort by rateascending
Average Annual Count
over rate period
sort sort by countdescending
Rate Period
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort sort by trenddescending
Michigan 5,10 70.7 # (70.0, 71.4) 7,872 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.7)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1,10 64.9 (64.7, 65.0) 212,768 § 2007-2011 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.6)
Arenac County 6,10 96.6 # (79.9, 116.4) 24 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.5 (-15.0, 18.7)
Wexford County 6,10 95.1 # (81.9, 109.8) 38 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.9 (-3.0, 9.1)
Crawford County 6,10 92.6 # (75.2, 113.6) 20 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1 (-32.0, 43.9)
Lake County 6,10 91.2 # (72.3, 114.5) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1 (-10.6, 14.1)
Clare County 6,10 89.5 # (77.6, 102.8) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.9 (-15.5, 0.3)
Ontonagon County 6,10 88.4 # (66.6, 118.2) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-29.8, 28.4)
Roscommon County 6,10 87.4 # (75.5, 101.3) 43 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.4 (-19.6, 18.5)
Wayne County 7,8 87.2 (85.3, 89.1) 1,697 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
Osceola County 6,10 85.5 # (71.2, 102.0) 26 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.2 (-24.8, 50.0)
Genesee County 6,10 83.8 # (80.2, 87.6) 401 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.6)
Jackson County 6,10 83.4 # (77.5, 89.6) 154 2007-2011 falling falling trend -5.9 (-10.9, -0.7)
Ogemaw County 6,10 82.9 # (69.7, 98.3) 29 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.6 (-28.3, 6.4)
Manistee County 6,10 82.2 # (69.8, 96.7) 32 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.2 (-26.2, 16.7)
Kalkaska County 6,10 81.4 # (65.4, 100.5) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.6 (-23.4, 21.5)
Gladwin County 6,10 80.4 # (68.6, 94.1) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-8.8, 5.8)
Montcalm County 6,10 80.0 # (70.9, 90.0) 57 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.7 (-16.0, 1.5)
Luce County 6,10 79.6 # (56.1, 111.0) 8 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.8 (-43.1, 100.5)
Macomb County 7,8 79.3 (76.8, 81.9) 767 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.4, 0.1)
Shiawassee County 6,10 78.9 # (70.4, 88.1) 65 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.3 (-6.6, 21.0)
Alpena County 6,10 78.8 # (67.5, 91.8) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.9 (-8.2, 10.8)
Chippewa County 6,10 78.6 # (67.4, 91.2) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-20.2, 21.4)
Cass County 6,10 78.0 # (68.7, 88.3) 53 2007-2011 stable stable trend -12.6 (-23.9, 0.4)
Missaukee County 6,10 77.9 # (61.8, 97.4) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend 11.6 (-13.3, 43.7)
Calhoun County 6,10 76.6 # (70.7, 83.0) 125 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-12.6, 8.5)
Tuscola County 6,10 75.8 # (66.9, 85.7) 54 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.2 (-17.8, 7.1)
Schoolcraft County 6,10 74.9 # (55.8, 100.0) 10 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2 (-13.6, 20.4)
Gratiot County 6,10 74.7 # (64.2, 86.6) 37 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.8 (-17.3, 9.6)
Van Buren County 6,10 74.2 # (66.2, 82.8) 66 2007-2011 falling falling trend -11.9 (-18.5, -4.8)
Mason County 6,10 73.9 # (62.5, 87.1) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-29.1, 19.9)
Bay County 6,10 73.0 # (66.7, 79.8) 102 2007-2011 falling falling trend -13 (-22.2, -2.6)
Branch County 6,10 72.6 # (62.7, 83.6) 40 2007-2011 stable stable trend -10.8 (-23.5, 3.9)
Muskegon County 6,10 72.6 # (67.2, 78.2) 140 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.6 (-1.2, 12.7)
Cheboygan County 6,10 72.2 # (60.9, 85.3) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6.8 (-16.9, 4.5)
Oscoda County 6,10 72.0 # (53.7, 96.1) 11 2007-2011 stable stable trend 7.6 (-20.6, 45.7)
St. Clair County 6,10 71.7 # (66.5, 77.3) 141 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.2 (-9.6, 8.0)
Hillsdale County 6,10 71.7 # (62.2, 82.3) 42 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.7 (-14.5, 6.2)
Saginaw County 6,10 71.4 # (66.7, 76.4) 174 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.3 (-11.1, 5.3)
Emmet County 6,10 71.1 # (60.1, 83.8) 31 2007-2011 stable stable trend 5.4 (-13.1, 27.8)
Lapeer County 6,10 71.1 # (63.8, 79.1) 72 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-14.9, 5.9)
Presque Isle County 6,10 70.4 # (56.1, 88.3) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.8 (-20.7, 21.8)
Isabella County 6,10 70.3 # (60.7, 81.0) 39 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-15.0, 7.3)
Montmorency County 6,10 69.9 # (54.2, 90.8) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.6 (-21.3, 20.4)
Berrien County 6,10 69.7 # (64.6, 75.1) 140 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-12.5, 4.3)
Newaygo County 6,10 69.6 # (60.4, 80.0) 41 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11 (-27.0, 8.4)
Otsego County 6,10 69.2 # (57.0, 83.5) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.9 (-26.2, 33.0)
Iosco County 6,10 69.0 # (58.9, 81.0) 35 2007-2011 falling falling trend -7.2 (-11.8, -2.3)
Benzie County 6,10 68.5 # (55.2, 84.6) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend 19.5 (-0.2, 43.2)
Kalamazoo County 6,10 67.7 # (63.1, 72.4) 171 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.7 (-18.7, 14.1)
Marquette County 6,10 67.5 # (59.5, 76.3) 54 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-18.1, 18.1)
St. Joseph County 6,10 67.3 # (59.1, 76.4) 49 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.1 (-18.7, 10.7)
Mackinac County 6,10 67.0 # (51.1, 87.6) 12 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6 (-31.3, 28.6)
Oakland County 7,8 66.6 (64.6, 68.7) 872 2007-2011 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Monroe County 6,10 66.1 # (60.7, 71.9) 113 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.8 (-21.4, 5.8)
Alcona County 6,10 64.9 # (50.9, 83.9) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-27.5, 36.4)
Gogebic County 6,10 63.5 # (50.6, 79.5) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.4 (-11.4, 20.5)
Baraga County 6,10 63.3 # (44.3, 88.6) 7 2007-2011 stable stable trend 6.5 (-32.1, 66.9)
Ionia County 6,10 62.5 # (54.0, 72.0) 40 2007-2011 stable stable trend -5.5 (-24.1, 17.6)
Midland County 6,10 62.5 # (55.7, 70.0) 62 2007-2011 stable stable trend -2.7 (-24.2, 24.9)
Lenawee County 6,10 62.3 # (56.0, 69.1) 74 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.5 (-12.1, 3.9)
Grand Traverse County 6,10 62.0 # (55.3, 69.3) 65 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8 (-0.5, 17.3)
Delta County 6,10 61.3 # (52.1, 71.9) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.4 (-10.7, 15.2)
Charlevoix County 6,10 61.3 # (50.3, 74.2) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 3.5 (-10.2, 19.3)
Kent County 6,10 60.7 # (57.8, 63.7) 341 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.1, 5.2)
Livingston County 6,10 59.8 # (54.8, 65.3) 110 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.8, 5.8)
Eaton County 6,10 59.5 # (53.5, 66.1) 73 2007-2011 stable stable trend -6 (-13.9, 2.6)
Ingham County 6,10 59.3 # (55.1, 63.8) 149 2007-2011 stable stable trend -1.6 (-10.7, 8.4)
Alger County 6,10 58.8 # (42.8, 80.3) 9 2007-2011 stable stable trend -11.4 (-43.4, 38.6)
Antrim County 6,10 58.7 # (48.3, 71.1) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.4 (-21.2, 28.0)
Mecosta County 6,10 58.5 # (49.4, 68.9) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -4.2 (-19.2, 13.6)
Washtenaw County 6,10 58.3 # (54.3, 62.4) 173 2007-2011 stable stable trend -0.5 (-8.8, 8.6)
Barry County 6,10 58.0 # (50.2, 66.8) 41 2007-2011 falling falling trend -20 (-29.5, -9.4)
Iron County 6,10 56.5 # (43.6, 73.6) 14 2007-2011 stable stable trend 1.1 (-11.8, 15.8)
Sanilac County 6,10 56.4 # (48.1, 65.9) 33 2007-2011 stable stable trend -3.1 (-21.5, 19.6)
Houghton County 6,10 55.8 # (46.0, 67.2) 23 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7 (-19.0, 6.8)
Huron County 6,10 55.4 # (46.7, 65.5) 30 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.8 (-20.1, 6.4)
Allegan County 6,10 52.5 # (46.9, 58.7) 65 2007-2011 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.4, 2.8)
Oceana County 6,10 49.0 # (39.3, 60.7) 18 2007-2011 stable stable trend -7.4 (-23.1, 11.5)
Dickinson County 6,10 48.2 # (38.9, 59.3) 19 2007-2011 stable stable trend 8.4 (-21.8, 50.2)
Leelanau County 6,10 44.0 # (34.6, 55.8) 16 2007-2011 falling falling trend -9.3 (-17.7, -0.1)
Menominee County 6,10 43.7 # (34.6, 55.0) 16 2007-2011 stable stable trend 2.5 (-34.5, 60.4)
Clinton County 6,10 43.5 # (37.2, 50.6) 35 2007-2011 stable stable trend -8.1 (-18.1, 3.0)
Ottawa County 6,10 38.4 # (35.0, 42.1) 96 2007-2011 falling falling trend -11 (-15.0, -6.7)
Keweenaw County 6,10
*
3 or fewer
2007-2011 * *
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/22/2014 5:35 am.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.
§ The total count for the US (SEER+NPCR) may differ from the summation of the individual states reported in this table. The total uses data from the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2013 data submission for the following states: California, Kentucky, Louisiana, and New Jersey but data for those states when shown individually are sourced from the SEER November 2013 submission.
# Data do not include cases diagnosed in other states for those states in which the data exchange agreement specifically prohibits the release of data to third parties.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 cases were reported in a specific area-sex-race category.

1 Source: CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission and SEER November 2013 submission.
5 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
6 Source: State Cancer Registry and the CDC's National Program of Cancer Registries Cancer Surveillance System (NPCR-CSS) January 2014 data submission. State rates include rates from metropolitan areas funded by SEER.
7 Source: SEER November 2013 submission.
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2013 data.
10 Source: Incidence data provided by the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR). EAPCs calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2012 US Population Data File is used with NPCR January 2014 data.

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availablility, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

Return to Top